The Importance of Separating the Probability of Committing and Detecting Misstatements in the Restatement Setting

References

• Albrecht A, Mauldin EG, Newton NJ (2018) Do auditors recognize the potential dark side of executives’ accounting competence? Accounting Rev. 93(6):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aobdia D (2018) The impact of the PCAOB individual engagement inspection process–Preliminary evidence. Accounting Rev. 93(4):53–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baik B, Choi S, Farber DB (2020) Managerial ability and income smoothing. Accounting Rev. 95(4):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beneish MD (1999) Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP. Accounting Rev. 74(4):425–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blankely A, Hurtt D, MacGregor J (2012) Abnormal audit fees and restatements. Auditing 31(1):79–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloomfield D, Shackman J (2008) Non-audit service fees, auditor characteristics and earnings restatements. Managerial Auditing J. 23(2):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonsall IV SB, Holzman ER, Miller BP (2017) Managerial ability and credit risk assessment. Management Sci. 63(5):1425–1449.Link, Google Scholar
• Callen JL, Rob S, Segal D (2008) Revenue manipulation and restatements by loss firms. Auditing 27(2):1–29.Google Scholar
• Carcello JV, Neal TL, Palmrose ZV, Scholz S (2011) CEO involvement in selecting board members, audit committee effectiveness, and restatements. Contemporary Accounting Res. 28(2):396–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carver BT, Cline BN, Hoag ML (2013) Underperformance of founder-led firms: An examination of compensation contracting theories during the executive stock options backdating scandal. J. Corporate Finance 23:294–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JH, Kim JB, Zang Y (2010) Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality? Auditing 29(2):115–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen BE, Glover SM, Omer TC, Shelley MK (2016) Understanding audit quality: Insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Res. 33(4):1648–1684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cline BN, Posylnaya VV (2019) Illegal insider trading: Commission and SEC detection. J. Corporate Finance 58:247–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornaggia KJ, Krishnan GV, Wang C (2017) Managerial ability and credit ratings. Contemporary Accounting Res. 34(4):2094–2122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis QD, Donelson DC, Hopkins JJ (2019) Revealing corporate financial misreporting. Contemporary Accounting Res. 36(3):1337–1372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeAngelo L (1981) Auditor size and audit quality. J. Accounting Econom. 3(3):183–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechow PM, Dichev ID (2002) The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of estimation errors. Accounting Rev. 77(s-1):35–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond M, Zhang J (2014) A review of archival auditing research. J. Accounting Econom. 58:275–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond ML, Lim CY, Zang Y (2016) Client conservatism and auditor-client contracting. Accounting Rev. 91(1):69–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond M, Erkens DH, Zhang J (2017) Do client characteristics really drive the Big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Sci. 63(11):3628–3649.Link, Google Scholar
• Demerjian PR, Lev B, McVay SE (2012) Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Sci. 58(7):1229–1248.Link, Google Scholar
• Demerjian PR, Lewis-Western MF, McVay SE (2020) How does intentional earnings smoothing vary with managerial ability? J. Accounting Auditing Finance 35(2):406–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demerjian PR, Lev B, Lewis MF, McVay SE (2013) Managerial ability and earnings quality. Accounting Rev. 88(2):463–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diaz J, Martin GW, Thomas WB (2017) Financial reporting quality and auditor locality contagion. Auditing 36(4):71–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donelson D, Hopkins J, Yust C (2018) The cost of disclosure regulation: Evidence from D&O insurance and nonmeritorious securities litigation. Rev. Accounting Stud. 23(2):528–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Morse A, Zingales L (2021) How pervasive is corporate fraud? Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Eshleman JD, Guo P (2014) Do Big N auditors provide higher audit quality after controlling for the endogenous choice of auditor? Auditing 33(4):197–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farber HS (1983) The determination of union status of workers. Econometrica 51(5):1417–1437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fargher NL, Jiang L (2008) Changes in the audit environment and auditors’ propensity to issue going-concern opinions. Auditing 27(2):55–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinstein JS (1990) Detection controlled estimation. J. Law Econom. 33(1):233–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francis JR, Michas PN (2013) The contagion effect of low-quality audits. Accounting Rev. 88(2):521–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francis JR, Michas PN, Yu M (2013) Office size of Big N auditors and client restatements. Contemporary Accounting Res. 30(4):1626–1661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gipper B, Hail L, Leuz C (2021) On the economics of mandatory audit partner rotation and tenure: Evidence from PCAOB data. Accounting Rev. 96(2):303–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gleason CA, Jenkins NT, Johnson WB (2008) The contagion effects of accounting restatements. Accounting Rev. 83(1):83–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gow ID, Larcker DF, Reiss PC (2016) Causal inference in accounting research. J. Accounting Res. 54(2):477–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH, Hensher DA (2010) Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunny K, Hermis J (2020) How busyness influences SEC compliance activities: Evidence from the filing review process and comment letters. Contemporary Accounting Res. 37(1):7–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennes K, Leone A, Miller B (2008) The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover. Accounting Rev. 83(6):1487–1519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoitash R, Markelevich A, Barragato C (2007) Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing J. 22(8):761–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hribar P, Collins DW (2002) Errors in estimating accruals: Implications for empirical research. J. Accounting Res. 40(1):105–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hribar P, Kravet T, Wilson R (2014) A new measure of accounting quality. Rev. Accounting Stud. 19(1):506–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutton AP, Marcus AJ, Tehranian H (2009) Opaque financial reports, R^2, and crash risk. J. Financial Econom. 94(1)8:67–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna V, Kim EH, Lu Y (2015) CEO connectedness and corporate fraud. J. Finance 50(3):1203–1252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koester A, Shevlin T, Wangerin D (2017) The role of managerial ability in corporate tax avoidance. Management Sci. 63(10):3285–3310.Link, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Leone A, Wasley C (2005) Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. J. Accounting Econom. 39(1):163–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan GV, Wang C (2015) The relation between managerial ability and audit fees and going concern opinions. Auditing 34(3):139–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan J, Krishnan J (1996) The role of economic trade-offs in the audit opinion decision: An empirical analysis. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 11(4):565–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laurion H, Lawrence A, Ryans JP (2017) U.S. audit partner rotations. Accounting Rev. 92(3):209–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence A, Minutti-Meza M, Zhang P (2011) Can Big N vs. non-Big N differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? Accounting Rev. 86(1):259–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lobo GJ, Zhao Y (2013) Relation between audit effort and financial report misstatements: Evidence from quarterly and annual restatements. Accounting Rev. 88(4):1385–1412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon JR, Shipman JE, Swanquist QT, Whited RL(2022) On controlling for misstatement risk. Auditing: J. Practice Theory 41(2):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newton NJ, Wang D, Wilkins MS (2013) Does a lack of choice lead to lower quality? Evidence from auditor competition and client restatements. Auditing 32(3):31–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poirier D (1980) Partial observability in bivariate probit models. J. Econometrics 12(2):209–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice S, Weber D (2012) How effective is internal control reporting under SOX 404? Determinants of the (non-) disclosure of existing material weaknesses. J. Accounting Res. 50(3):811–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schroeder M (2001) SEC list of accounting-fraud probes grows. Wall Street Journal (July 6), C1, C16.Google Scholar
• Shipman JE, Swanquist QT, Whited RL (2017) Propensity score matching in accounting research. Accounting Rev. 92(1):213–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang TY (2013) Corporate securities fraud: Insights from a new empirical framework. J. Law Econom. Organ. 29(3):535–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang TY, Winton A, Yu X (2010) Corporate fraud and business conditions: Evidence from IPOs. J. Finance 65(6):2255–2292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber J, Willenborg M, Zhang J (2008) Does auditor reputation matter? The case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG. J. Accounting Res. 46(4):941–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young S (1999) Systematic measurement error in the estimation of discretionary accruals: An evaluation of alternative modeling procedures. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 26(7):833–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zakolyukina AA (2018) How common are intentional GAAP violations? Estimates from a dynamic model. J. Accounting Res. 56(1):5–44.Crossref, Google Scholar