In Art We Trust

References

• Adams RB, Kräussl R, Navone M, Verwijmeren P (2021) Gendered prices. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(8):3789–3839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beggs A, Graddy K (2009) Anchoring effects: Evidence from art auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):1027–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2014) High-dimensional methods and inference on structural and treatment effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(2):29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bocart F, Oosterlinck K (2011) Discoveries of fakes: Their impact on the art market. Econom. Lett. 113(2):124–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron L, Goetzmann WN, Nozari M (2019) Art and gender: Market bias or selection bias? J. Cultural Econom. 43(2):279–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chohan UW (2021) Non-fungible tokens: Blockchains, scarcity, and value. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Paper, Islamabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
• Deloitte Luxembourg and ArtTactic (2014) Art & finance report 2014. Accessed February 7, 2022, https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/es/Documents/acerca-de-deloitte/Deloitte-ES-Opera_Europa_Deloitte_Art_Finance_Report2014.pdf.Google Scholar
• Deloitte Luxembourg and ArtTactic (2016) Art & finance report 2016. Accessed February 7, 2022, https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/lu/Documents/financial-services/artandfinance/lu-en-artandfinancereport-21042016.pdf.Google Scholar
• Fairfield J (2022) Tokenized: The law of non-fungible tokens and unique digital property. Indiana Law J. 97(4):1261–1313.Google Scholar
• Goetzmann WN, Renneboog L, Spaenjers C (2011) Art and money. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):222–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graddy K, Loewenstein L, Mei JP, Moses M, Pownall RAJ (2023) Empirical evidence of anchoring and loss aversion from art auctions. J. Cultural Econom. 47:279–301.Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2008) Trusting the stock market. J. Finance 63(6):2557–2600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korteweg A, Kräussl R, Verwijmeren P (2016) Does it pay to invest in art? A selection-corrected returns perspective. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(4):1007–1038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Ma M, Renneboog L (2022) Pricing art and the art of pricing: On returns and risk in the art auction markets. Eur. Financial Management 28(5):1139–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovo S, Spaenjers C (2018) A model of trading in the art market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(3):744–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mei J, Moses M (2002) Art as an investment and the underperformance of masterpieces. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1656–1668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pénasse J, Renneboog L (2022) Speculative trading and bubbles: Evidence from the art market. Management Sci. 68(7):4939–4963.Link, Google Scholar
• Pénasse J, Renneboog L, Scheinkman J (2021) When a master dies: Speculation and asset float. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(8):3840–3879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pénasse J, Renneboog L, Spaenjers C (2014) Sentiment and art prices. Econom. Lett. 122(3):432–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pownall R (2017) TEFAF Art Market annual report 2017. The European Fine Art Foundation. Accessed February 7, 2022, http://made2measure.org/tefaf/amr2017/.Google Scholar
• Renneboog L, Spaenjers C (2013) Buying beauty: On prices and returns in the art market. Management Sci. 59(1):36–53.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Constantinides G, Harris M, Stulz R, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 493–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson D (2010) The $12 Million Stuffed Shark: The Curious Economics of Contemporary Art (Aurum Press, London).Google Scholar