Nudging Timely Wage Reporting: Field Experimental Evidence from the U.S. Supplemental Security Income Program

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4645

References

  • Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9–10):1082–1095.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H, Kessler JB (2019) The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 11(1):236–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3003–3037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alm J (2019) What motivates tax compliance. J. Econom. Survey 33(2):351–726.Google Scholar
  • Ayres I, Raseman S, Shih A (2013) Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. J. Law Econom. Organ. 29(5):992–1022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Shalom Y, Stapleton DC (2015) Long-term work activity and use of employment supports among new supplemental security income recipients. Soc. Security Bull. 75(1):73–95.Google Scholar
  • Benartzi S, Beshears J, Milkman KL, Sunstein CR, Thaler RH, Shankar M, Tucker-Ray W, et al. (2017) Should governments invest more in nudging? Psych. Sci. 28(8):1041–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhargava S, Manoli D (2015) Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefits: Evidence from an IRS field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(11):3489–3529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumenthal M, Christian C, Slemrod J (2001) Do normative appeals affect tax compliance? Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. National Tax J. 54(1):125–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bott KM, Cappelen AW, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2020) You’ve got mail: A randomized field experiment on tax evasion. Management Sci. 66(7):2801–3294.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Busso M, Cristia J, Humpage S (2015) Did you get your shots? Experimental evidence on the role of reminders. J. Health Econom. 44:226–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butera L, Metcalfe RD, Morrison W, Taubinsky D (2022) Measuring the welfare effects of shame and pride. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(1):122–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Farzan R, Kraut R, Zaare IY, Zhang AF (2021) Motivating experts to contribute to digital public goods: A personalized field experiment on Wikipedia. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  • Chetty R (2015) Behavioral economics and public policy: A pragmatic perspective. Amer. Econom. Rev. P & P 105(5):1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chetty R, Saez E (2013) Teaching the tax code: Earnings responses to an experiment with EITC recipients. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chetty R, Friedman J, Saez E (2013) Using differences in knowledge across neighborhoods to uncover the impacts of the EITC on earnings. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2683–2721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chirico M, Inman R, Loeffler C, MacDonald J, Sieg H (2019) Deterring tax delinquency in Philadelphia: An experimental evaluation of nudge strategies. National Tax J. 72(3):479–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coffman LC, Featherstone CR, Kessler JB (2017) Can social information affect what job you choose and keep? Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(1):96–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Congressional Budget Office (2019) Federal mandatory spending for means-tested programs, 2009 to 2029. CBO Publication No. 55347, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Cranor T, Goldin J, Homonoff T, Moore L (2020) Communicating tax penalties to delinquent taxpayers: Evidence from a field experiment. National Tax J. 73(2):331–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai H, Saccardo S, Han MA, Roh L, Raja N, Vangala S, Modi H, et al. (2021) Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature 597:404–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damgaard MT, Gravert C (2018) The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising. J. Public Econom. 157:15–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Neve J-E, Imbert C, Spinnewijn J, Tsankova T, Luts M (2021) How to improve tax compliance? Evidence from population-wide experiments in Belgium. J. Political Econom. 129(5):1425–1463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, Linos E (2022) RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica 90(1):81–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, Pope D (2018) What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(2):1029–1069.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deshpande M (2016) Does welfare inhibit success? The long-term effects of removing low-income youth from the disability rolls. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(11):3300–3330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deshpande M, Gross T, Su Y (2021) Disability and distress: The effect of disability programs on financial outcomes. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 13(2):151–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doerrenberg P, Schmitz J (2017) Tax compliance and information provision: A field experiment with small firms. J. Behav. Econom. Policy 1(1):47–54.Google Scholar
  • Dwenger N, Kleven H, Rasul I, Rincke J (2016) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations for tax compliance: Evidence from a field experiment in Germany. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 8(3):203–232.Google Scholar
  • Fellner G, Sausgruber R, Traxler C (2013) Testing enforcement strategies in the field: Threat, moral appeal and social information. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):634–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein A, Notowidigdo MJ (2019) Take-up and targeting: Experimental evidence from SNAP. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1505–1556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frey BS, Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1717–1722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerber AS, Rogers T (2009) Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. J. Politics 71(1):178–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gillitzer C, Sinning M (2020) Nudging businesses to pay their taxes: Does timing matter? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 169:284–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn R (2019) Building upon foundations for evidence-based policy. Science 364(6440):534–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallsworth M, List JA, Metcalfe RD, Vlaev I (2015) The making of Homo honoratus: From omission to commission. NBER Working Paper No. 21210, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Hallsworth M, List JA, Metcalfe RD, Vlaev I (2017) The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. J. Public Econom. 148:14–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holz JE, List JA, Zentner A, Cardoza M, Zentner J (2020) The $100 million nudge: Increasing tax compliance of businesses and the self-employed using a natural field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 27666, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Karlan D, Morten M, Zinman J (2016a) A personal touch in text messaging can improve microloan repayment. Behav. Sci. Policy 1(2):25–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karlan D, McConnell M, Mullainathan S, Zinman J (2016b) Getting to the top of mind: How reminders increase saving. Management Sci. 62(12):3393–3411.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaushal N (2010) Elderly immigrants’ labor supply response to supplemental security income. J. Policy Anal. Management 29(1):137–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keane LD, Nickerson DW (2015) When reports depress rather than inspire: A field experiment using age cohorts as reference groups. J. Political Marketing 14(4):381–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liebman JB, Luttmer EFP (2015) Would people behave differently if they better understood Social Security? Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 7(1):275–299.Google Scholar
  • List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2019) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. Experiment. Econom. 22:773–793.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luttmer EFP, Singhal M (2014) Tax morale. J. Econom. Perspective 28(4):149–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neumark D, Powers E (2000) Welfare for the elderly: The effects of SSI on preretirement labor supply. J. Public Econom. 78(1–2):51–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perez-Truglia R, Troiano U (2018) Shaming tax delinquents. J. Public Econom. 167:120–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pomeranz D (2015) No taxation without information: Deterrence and self-enforcement in the value added tax. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(8):2539–2569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18:429–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shang J, Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econom. J. (London) 119:1422–1439.Google Scholar
  • Slemrod J (2019) Tax compliance and enforcement. J. Econom. Literature 57(4):904–954.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Social Security Administration (2015) Report on Supplemental Security Income non-medical redeterminations, fiscal year 2011. Social Security Administration, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  • Social Security Administration (2019) Agency annual overpayment waivers report, fiscal year 2019. Social Security Administration, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  • Social Security Administration (2020a) Agency financial report, fiscal year 2020. Social Security Administration, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  • Social Security Administration (2020b) SSI annual statistical report, 2019. SSA Publication No. 13-11827. Social Security Administration, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.