Managing Airfares Under Competition: Insights from a Field Experiment

References

• Adida E, Perakis G (2010) Dynamic pricing and inventory control: Uncertainty and competition. Oper. Res. 58(2):289–302.Link, Google Scholar
• Angelucci M, Di Maro V (2016) Programme evaluation and spillover effects. J. Development Effect 8(1):22–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav. Res. 46(3):399–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin PC, Stuart EA (2015) Moving toward best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statist. Medicine 34(28):3661–3679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belobaba P, Odoni A, Barnhart C (2015) The Global Airline Industry (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Belobaba PP (1989) Application of a probabilistic decision model to airline seat inventory control. Oper. Res. 37(2):183–197.Link, Google Scholar
• Belobaba PP, Wilson JL (1997) Impacts of yield management in competitive airline markets. J. Air Transportation Management 3(1):3–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg T, Reisinger M, Streitz D (2020) Handling spillover effects in empirical research. J. Financial Econom. 142(3):1109–1127.Google Scholar
• Bitran G, Caldentey R (2003) An overview of pricing models for revenue management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(3):203–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Bray RL, Coviello D, Ichino A, Persico N (2016) Multitasking, multiarmed bandits, and the Italian judiciary. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(4):545–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Butts K (2022) Difference-in-differences with spatial spillovers. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Miller DL (2015) A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J. Human Resources 50(2):317–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caro F, Gallien J (2012) Clearance pricing optimization for a fast-fashion retailer. Oper. Res. 60(6):1404–1422.Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke D (2017) Estimating Difference-in-differences in the presence of spillovers. Working paper, University of Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
• Clarke D (2019) Estimating difference-in-differences in the presence of spillovers. MPRA Paper 81604, University Library of Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Gallego G (1995) Optimal starting times for end-of-season sales and optimal stopping times for promotional fares. Management Sci. 41(8):1371–1391.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Gallino S, Li J (2018) Competition-based dynamic pricing in online retailing: A methodology validated with field experiments. Management Sci. 64(6):2496–2514.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Hu M (2014) Dynamic pricing of perishable assets under competition. Management Sci. 60(5):1241–1259.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Van Ryzin G (1994) Optimal dynamic pricing of inventories with stochastic demand over finite horizons. Management Sci. 40(8):999–1020.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaur V, Fisher ML (2005) In-store experiments to determine the impact of price on sales. Production Oper. Management 14(4):377–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2018) Public insurance and mortality: Evidence from Medicaid implementation. J. Political Econom. 126(1):216–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koppelman FS, Coldren GM, Parker RA (2008) Schedule delay impacts on air-travel itinerary demand. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 42(3):263–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lechner M (2011) The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods. Foundations Trends® Econometrics 4(3):165–224.Google Scholar
• Li J, Granados N, Netessine S (2014) Are consumers strategic? Structural estimation from the air-travel industry. Management Sci. 60(9):2114–2137.Link, Google Scholar
• Lurkin V, Garrow LA, Higgins MJ, Newman JP, Schyns M (2017) Accounting for price endogeneity in airline itinerary choice models: An application to continental US markets. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 100:228–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martínez-de-Albéniz V, Talluri K (2011) Dynamic price competition with fixed capacities. Management Sci. 57(6):1078–1093.Link, Google Scholar
• McGill J, Van Ryzin G (1999) Revenue management: Research overview and prospects. Transportation Sci. 33(2):233–256.Link, Google Scholar
• Monfared S., Pavlov A. (2019) Political risk affects real estate markets. J. Real Estate Finance and Econom. 58:1–20.Google Scholar
• Moreno A, Terwiesch C (2015) Pricing and production flexibility: An empirical analysis of the US automotive industry. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):428–444.Link, Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Shumsky RA (2005) Revenue management games: Horizontal and vertical competition. Management Sci. 51(5):813–831.Link, Google Scholar
• Nicolae M, Arikan M, Deshpande V, Ferguson M (2016) Do bags fly free? An empirical analysis of the operational implications of airline baggage fees. Management Sci. 63(10):3187–3206.Link, Google Scholar
• Olivares M, Cachon GP (2009) Competing retailers and inventory: An empirical investigation of General Motors’ dealerships in isolated US markets. Management Sci. 55(9):1586–1604.Link, Google Scholar
• Perakis G, Sood A (2006) Competitive multi-period pricing for perishable products: A robust optimization approach. Math. Programming 107(1–2):295–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramdas K, Williams J, Lipson M (2013) Can financial markets inform operational improvement efforts? Evidence from the airline industry. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):405–422.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (2001) Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services Outcomes Res. Methodology 2(3–4):169–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stamatopoulos I, Bassamboo A, Moreno A (2017) The effects of menu costs on supply chain efficiency: Evidence from adoption of the electronic shelf label technology. Working paper, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
• Stuart EA, Lee BK, Leacy FP (2013) Prognostic score–based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research. J. Clinical Epidemiology 66(8):S84–S90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talluri K, Van Ryzin G (1998) An analysis of bid-price controls for network revenue management. Management Sci. 44(11):1577–1593.Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri K, Van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri KT, Van Ryzin GJ (2006) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management, vol. 68 (Springer Science & Business Media, Boston).Google Scholar
• Talluri KT, Van Ryzin G, Van Ryzin G (2004) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management, vol. 1 (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wager S, Athey S (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(523):1228–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch A (2012) Quality of service index. Accessed May 6, 2022, http://www.aci-na.org/sites/default/files/welch_qsi_fundamentals.pdf.Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Adelman D (2009) An approximate dynamic programming approach to network revenue management with customer choice. Transportation Sci. 43(3):381–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Weatherford L (2017) Dynamic pricing for network revenue management: A new approach and application in the hotel industry. INFORMS J. Comput. 29(1):18–35.Link, Google Scholar