Optimal Sequencing in Single-Player Games

References

• Aflaki S, Popescu I (2013) Managing retention in service relationships. Management Sci. 60(2):415–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Ascarza E, Netzer O, Runge J (2020) The twofold effect of customer retention in freemium settings. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bakshi MS, Arora SR (1969) The sequencing problem. Management Sci. 16(4):B–247.Google Scholar
• Banister EW, Calvert TW, Savage MV, Bach T (1975) A systems model of training for athletic performance. Australian J Sports Medicine 7(3):57–61.Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Zhao L (2019) It is time to get some rest. Management Sci. 65(4):1717–1734.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowman EH (1959) The schedule-sequencing problem. Oper. Res. 7(5):621–624.Link, Google Scholar
• Buraimo B, Forrest D, McHale IG, Tena J (2020) Unscripted drama: Soccer audience response to suspense, surprise, and shock. Econom. Inquiry 58(2):881–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J (2007) Flow in games (and everything else). Comm. ACM 50(4):31–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen N, Elmachtoub AN, Hamilton ML, Lei X (2021) Loot box pricing and design. Management Sci. 67(8):4809–4825.Link, Google Scholar
• Cowley B, Charles D, Black M, Hickey R (2008) Toward an understanding of flow in video games. Comput. Entertainment 6(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Das Gupta A, Karmarkar US, Roels G (2016) The design of experiential services with acclimation and memory decay: Optimal sequence and duration. Management Sci. 62(5):1278–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Dixon M, Verma R (2013) Sequence effects in service bundles: Implications for service design and scheduling. J. Oper. Management 31(3):138–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixon MJ, Victorino L (2019) The sequence of service: An affect perspective to service scheduling. Handbook of Service Science, vol. II (Springer, Berlin), 49–76.Google Scholar
• Dixon MJ, Victorino L, Kwortnik RJ, Verma R (2017) Surprise, anticipation, and sequence effects in the design of experiential services. Production Oper. Management 26(5):945–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely J, Frankel A, Kamenica E (2015) Suspense and surprise. J. Political Econom. 123(1):215–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emmons H (1969) One-machine sequencing to minimize certain functions of job tardiness. Oper. Res. 17(4):701–715.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo H, Hao L, Mukhopadhyay T, Sun D (2019a) Selling virtual currency in digital games: Implications for gameplay and social welfare. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):430–446.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo H, Zhao X, Hao L, Liu D (2019b) Economic analysis of reward advertising. Production Oper. Management 28(10):2413–2430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiwiller Z (2015) Players Making Decisions: Game Design Essentials and the Art of Understanding Your Players (New Riders).Google Scholar
• Hodent C (2017) The Gamer’s Brain: How Neuroscience and UX Can Impact Video Game Design (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hormeß M, Lawrence A (2012) Boom! Wow. Wow! WOW! BOOOOM!!!. Touchpoint 4(2):24–27.Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Jasin S, Manchanda P (2019) Level Up”: Leveraging skill and engagement to maximize player game-play in online video games. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):927–947.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Lim KH, Lin Z (2020) Leveraging the numerosity effect to influence perceived expensiveness of virtual items. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):93–114.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiao Y, Tang CS, Wang J (2020) Opaque selling in player-vs-player games. Preprint, submitted April 10, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3558774.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Fredrickson BL, Schreiber CA, Redelmeier DA (1993) When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psych. Sci. 4(6):401–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalmpourtzis G (2018) Educational Game Design Fundamentals: A Journey to Creating Intrinsically Motivating Learning Experiences (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD (2012) Online gaming addiction in children and adolescents: A review of empirical research. J. Behav. Addiction 1(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Dai T, Qi X (2022) A theory of interior peaks: Activity sequencing and selection for service design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):993–1001.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, Prelec D (1993) Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psych. Rev. 100(1):91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Meng L, Zhang C, Shao X, Zhang B, Ren Y, Lin W (2020) More MILP models for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem and its extended problems. Internat. J. Production Res. 58(13):3905–3930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meng Z, Hao L, Tan Y (2021) Freemium pricing in digital games with virtual currency. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):481–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Naderi B, Roshanaei V, Begen MA, Aleman DM, Urbach DR (2021) Increased surgical capacity without additional resources: Generalized operating room planning and scheduling. Production Oper. Management 30(8):2608–2635.Google Scholar
• Nalbantis G, Pawlowski T (2019) US demand for European soccer telecasts: A between-country test of the uncertainty of outcome hypothesis. J. Sports Econom. 20(6):797–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plass JL, Homer BD, Kinzer CK (2015) Foundations of game-based learning. Edu. Psych. 50(4):258–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renault J, Solan E, Vieille N (2017) Optimal dynamic information provision. Games Econom. Behav. 104:329–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roels G (2019) Optimal structure of experiential services: Review and extensions. Handbook of Service Science, vol. II (Springer, Berlin), 105–146.Google Scholar
• Roels G (2020) High-performance practice processes. Management Sci. 66(4):1509–1526.Link, Google Scholar
• Runge J, Nair H, Levav J (2021) Price promotions for “freemium” app monetization. Preprint, submitted March 19, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3357275.Google Scholar
• Sardi L, Idri A, Fernández-Alemán JL (2017) A systematic review of gamification in e-health. J. Biomedical Inform. 71:31–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schell J (2019) The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Seaborn K, Fels DI (2015) Gamification in theory and action: A survey. Internat. J. Humum Comput. Stud. 74:14–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheng L, Ryan CT, Nagarajan M, Cheng Y, Tong C (2022) Incentivized actions in freemium games. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):275–284.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Tozour P (2013) Decision modeling and optimization in game design, part 9: Modular level design. Accessed December 29, 2022, https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/decision-modeling-and-optimization-in-game-design-part-9-modular-level-design.Google Scholar
• Turner J, Scheller-Wolf A, Tayur S (2011) Scheduling of dynamic in-game advertising. Oper. Res. 59(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Vu D, Zhao X, Stecke K (2020) Pay-to-win in video games: Microtransactions and fairness concerns. Preprint, submitted August 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3658537.Google Scholar