Congestion Information and Efficiency: An Experiment

References

• Ashraf S, Brown AL, Burris MW, Vitaku V (2023) Aggregate and individual effects of information in a coordination (traffic) game. Econom. Inquiry 61(4):818–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M, De Palma A, Isam K (1991) Dynamic network models and driver information systems. Transportation Res. Part A: General 25(5):251–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Elia E, Di Pace R, Bifulco GN, Shiftan Y (2013) The impact of travel information’s accuracy on route-choice. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 26:146–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braess D (1968) Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung 12:258–268.Google Scholar
• Cabannes T, Shyu F, Porter E, Yao S, Wang Y, Vincentelli MAS, Hinardi S, et al. (2018a) Measuring regret in routing: Assessing the impact of increased app usage. Proc. 21st Internat. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems (IEEE, New York), 2589–2594.Google Scholar
• Cabannes T, Vincentelli MAS, Sundt A, Signargout H, Porter E, Fighiera V, Ugirumurera J, et al. (2018b) The impact of GPS-enabled shortest path routing on mobility: A game theoretic approach. Proc. Transportation Res. Board 97th Annual Meeting (NAP, Washington, DC), Article 18-02304.Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Ho T-H (1999) Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4):827–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung Y-W, Friedman D (1997) Individual learning in normal form games: Some laboratory results. Games Econom. Behav. 19(1):46–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Denant-Boèmont L, Petiot R (2003) Information value and sequential decision-making in a transport setting: An experimental study. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodologica 37(4):365–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emmerink RH, Verhoef ET, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (1996) Information provision in road transport with elastic demand: A welfare economic approach. J. Transport Econom. Policy 30(2):117–136.Google Scholar
• Erev I, Barron G (2005) On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psych. Rev. 112(4):912–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Rapoport A (1998) Coordination, “magic”, and reinforcement learning in a market entry game. Games Econom. Behav. 23(2):146–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Roth AE (1998) Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):848–881.Google Scholar
• Erev I, Roth AE (2014) Maximization, learning, and economic behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(supplement_3):10818–10825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Ert E, Plonsky O, Roth Y (2023) Contradictory deviations from maximization: Environment-specific biases, or reflections of basic properties of human learning? Psychol. Rev. 130(3):640–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Ert E, Plonsky O, Cohen D, Cohen O (2017) From anomalies to forecasts: Toward a descriptive model of decisions under risk, under ambiguity, and from experience. Psych. Rev. 124(4):369–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):541–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econom. Lett. 71(3):397–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Levine DK (1995) Consistency and cautious fictitious play. J. Econom. Dynamic Control 19(5–7):1065–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Camerer CF, Chong J-K (2007) Self-tuning experience weighted attraction learning in games. J. Econom. Theory 133(1):177–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1988) Experimental economics: A psychological perspective. Bounded Rational Behavior in Experimental Games and Markets (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 11–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer I, Mansour Y, Perry M (2014) Implementing the “wisdom of the crowd.” J. Political Econom. 122(5):988–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu S, Guo L, Easa SM, Yan H, Wei H, Tang Y (2020) Experimental study of day-to-day route-choice behavior: Evaluating the effect of ATIS market penetration. J. Adv. Transportation 2020:8393724.Google Scholar
• Lu X, Gao S, Ben-Elia E (2011) Information impacts on route choice and learning behavior in a congested network: Experimental approach. Transportation Res. Record 2243(1):89–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macfarlane J (2019) Your navigation app is making traffic unmanageable. IEEE Spectrum (September 19), https://spectrum.ieee.org/your-navigation-app-is-making-traffic-unmanageable/.Google Scholar
• Madrigal AC (2018) The perfect selfishness of mapping apps. The Atlantic (March 15), https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/03/mapping-apps-and-the-price-of-anarchy/555551/.Google Scholar
• Mak V, Gisches EJ, Rapoport A (2015) Route vs. segment: An experiment on real-time travel information in congestible networks. Production Oper. Management 24(6):947–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore J (2016) Waze, please stop ruining Los Angeles. GQ (April 9), https://www.gq.com/story/waze-ruining-los-angels-side-streets/.Google Scholar
• Plonsky O, Teodorescu K, Erev I (2015) Reliance on small samples, the wavy recency effect, and similarity-based learning. Psych. Rev. 122(4):621–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Gisches EJ, Daniel T, Lindsey R (2014) Pre-trip information and route-choice decisions with stochastic travel conditions: Experiment. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 68:154–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Kugler T, Dugar S, Gisches EJ (2009) Choice of routes in congested traffic networks: Experimental tests of the Braess Paradox. Games Econom. Behav. 65(2):538–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Erev I (1995) Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games Econom. Behav. 8(1):164–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R (1967) Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany), 136–168.Google Scholar
• Selten R, Chmura T, Pitz T, Kube S, Schreckenberg M (2007) Commuters’ route choice behaviour. Games Econom. Behav. 58(2):394–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weise E (2017) Waze and other traffic dodging apps prompt cities to game the algorithms. USA TODAY (March 6), https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/03/06/mapping-soft ware-routing-waze-google-traffic-calming-algorithmsi/9858 8980/.Google Scholar
• Wijayaratna KP, Dixit VV, Denant-Boemont L, Waller ST (2017) An experimental study of the Online Information Paradox: Does en-route information improve road network performance? PLoS One 12(9):e0184191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yakobi O, Cohen D, Naveh E, Erev I (2020) Reliance on small samples and the value of taxing reckless behaviors. Judgment Decision Making 15(2):266–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Verhoef ET (2006) A monopolistic market for advanced traveller information systems and road use efficiency. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 40(5):424–443.Crossref, Google Scholar