The Production and Consumption of Social Media

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00060

References

  • Alatas A, Chandrasekhar AG, Mobius M, Olken BA, Paladines C (2024) Do celebrity endorsements matter? A Twitter experiment promoting vaccination in Indonesia. Econom. J. 134(659):913–933.Google Scholar
  • Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econom. Perspectives 31(2):211–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M (2020) The welfare effects of social media. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(3):629–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakshy E, Messing S, Adamic LA (2015) Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348(6239):1130–1132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berman R, Katona Z (2020) Curation algorithms and filter bubbles in social networks. Marketing Sci. 39(2):296–316.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bollobás B, Borgs C, Chayes JT, Riordan O (2003) Directed scale-free graphs. Proc. Fourteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SODA) (Association for Computer Machinery, New York), 132–137.Google Scholar
  • Cirkovic D, Wang T, Resnick SI (2023) Preferential attachment with reciprocity: Properties and estimation. J. Complex Networks 11(5):cnad031.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman B (2020) Why is it okay to average embeddings? Technical post on: https://randorithms.com/2020/11/17/Adding-Embeddings.html.Google Scholar
  • Cosslett SR (1981) Chapter 2: Efficient estimation of discrete choice models. Manski CF, McFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proc. 2019 Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 4171–4186.Google Scholar
  • Gelman A (2008) Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statist. Medicine 27(15):2865–2873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imbens GW (1992) An efficient method of moments estimator for discrete choice models with choice-based sampling. Econometrica 60(5):1187–1214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson MO, Wolinsky A (1996) A strategic model of social and economic networks. J. Econom. Theory 71(1):44–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King G, Zeng L (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Anal. 9(2):137–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krueger AB (2005) The economics of real superstars: The market for rock concerts in the material world. J. Labor Econom. 23(1):1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kwak H, Lee C, Park H, Moon S (2010) What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 591–600.Google Scholar
  • Levy RE (2021) Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):831–870.Google Scholar
  • Myers SA, Sharma A, Gupta P, Lin J (2014) Information network or social network? The structure of the Twitter follow graph. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 493–498.Google Scholar
  • Pennycook G, Epstein Z, Mosleh M, Arechar AA, Eckles D, Rand DG (2021) Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature 592(7855):590–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S (1981) The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(5):845–858.Google Scholar
  • Sadri AM, Hasan S, Ukkusuri SV, Suarez Lopez JE (2018) Analysis of social interaction network properties and growth on Twitter. Soc. Networks Anal. Mining 8(1):1–13.Google Scholar
  • Silverman BW (2018) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H (1971) Designing organizations for an information-rich world. Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore), 37–72.Google Scholar
  • Srinivasan K (2023) Paying attention. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vicario MD, Vivaldo G, Bessi A, Zollo F, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Quattrociocchi W (2016) Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on Facebook. Sci. Rep. 6(1):1–12.Google Scholar
  • White L, Togneri R, Liu W, Bennamoun M (2015) How well sentence embeddings capture meaning. Proc. 20th Australasian Document Comput. Sympos. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–8.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.