The Competition for Partners in Matching Markets

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu A, Agarwal N, Pathak PA (2017) The welfare effects of coordinated assignment: Evidence from the New York city high school match. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(12):3635–3689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroglu A, Pathak PA, Roth AE (2005) The New York City high school match. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(2):364–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C (2006) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More (Hachette, New York).Google Scholar
• Arnosti N (2023) Lottery design for school choice. Management Sci. 69(1):244–259.Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Nikzad A (2020) What matters in school choice tie-breaking? How competition guides design. J. Econom. Theory 190:105120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Kanoria Y, Leshno JD (2017) Unbalanced random matching markets: The stark effect of competition. J. Political Econom. 125(1):69–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Nikzad A, Romm A (2019) Assigning more students to their top choices: A comparison of tie-breaking rules. Games Econom. Behav. 115:167–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biro P, Hassidim A, Romm A, Shorrer RI, Sovago S (2022) The large core of college admission markets: Theory and evidence. Proc. 23rd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 958–959.Google Scholar
• Cai L, Thomas C (2019) The short-side advantage in random matching markets. Preprint, submitted October 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04406.Google Scholar
• Che YK, Tercieux O (2019) Efficiency and stability in large matching markets. J. Political Econom. 127(5):2301–2342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Jiang M, Kesten O (2020) An empirical evaluation of Chinese college admissions reforms through a natural experiment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(50):31696–31705.Google Scholar
• Chetty R (2009) Sufficient statistics for welfare analysis: A bridge between structural and reduced-form methods. Annu. Rev. Econom. 1(1):451–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles P, Kushnir A, Niederle M (2013) Preference signaling in matching markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 5(2):99–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles P, Cawley J, Levine PB, Niederle M, Roth AE, Siegfried JJ (2010) The job market for new economists: A market design perspective. J. Econom. Perspective 24(4):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David M (2013) Algorithmics of Matching Under Preferences, vol. 2 (World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dubins LE, Freedman DA (1981) Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley algorithm. Amer. Math. Monthly 88(7):485–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dur U, Kominers SD, Pathak PA, Sönmez T (2018) Reserve design: Unintended consequences and the demise of Boston’s walk zones. J. Political Econom. 126(6):2457–2479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Jan Piskorski M, Yıldırım P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Hassidim A, Romm A, Shorrer RI (2017) Redesigning the Israeli psychology master’s match. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):205–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitsch GJ, Hortaçsu A, Ariely D (2010) Matching and sorting in online dating. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):130–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibragimov R, Walden J (2010) Optimal bundling strategies under heavy-tailed valuations. Management Sci. 56(11):1963–1976.Link, Google Scholar
• Ibragimov M, Ibragimov R, Walden J (2015) Heavy-Tailed Distributions and Robustness in Economics and Finance, vol. 214 (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Immorlica N, Mahdian M (2005) Marriage, honesty, and stability. Proc. 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 53–62.Google Scholar
• Jagadeesan M, Wei A (2018) Varying the number of signals in matching markets. Proc. Internat. Conf. Web Internet Econom. (Springer, Berlin), 232–245.Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Roth AE (2000) The dynamics of reorganization in matching markets: A laboratory experiment motivated by a natural experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 115(1):201–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2021) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms. Management Sci. 67(10):5990–6029.Link, Google Scholar
• Knuth DE (1976) Mariages Stables et leurs Relations avec d’Autres Problemes Combinatoires: Introduction a l’Analysis Mathematique des Algorithmes (Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal).Google Scholar
• Knuth DE, Motwani R, Pittel B (1990) Stable husbands. Random Structures Algorithms 1(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kojima F, Pathak PA (2009) Incentives and stability in large two-sided matching markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):608–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Niederle M (2015) Propose with a rose? Signaling in Internet dating markets. Experiment. Econom. 18(4):731–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McVitie DG, Wilson LB (1971) The stable marriage problem. Comm. ACM 14(7):486–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menzel K (2015) Large matching markets as two-sided demand systems. Econometrica 83(3):897–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pittel B (1989) The average number of stable matchings. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 2(4):530–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pittel B (1992) On likely solutions of a stable marriage problem. Ann. Appl. Probabilities 2(2):358–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pittel B (2019) On likely solutions of the stable matching problem with unequal numbers of men and women. Math. Oper. Res. 44(1):122–146.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Resnick SI (2007) Heavy-Tail Phenomena: Probabilistic and Statistical Modeling (Springer Science & Business Media, Boston).Google Scholar
• Rheingans-Yoo R (2024) Large random matching markets with localized preference structures can exhibit large cores. Games Econom. Behav. 144:71–83.Google Scholar
• Rios I, Larroucau T, Parra G, Cominetti R (2021) Improving the Chilean college admissions system. Oper. Res. 69(4):1186–1205.Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1986) On the allocations of residents to rural hospitals: A general property of two-sided matching markets. Econometrica 54(2):425–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1991) A natural experiment in the organization of entry-level labor markets: Regional markets for new physicians and surgeons in the United Kingdom. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(3):415–440.Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: Some engineering aspects of economic design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(4):748–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sotomayor MAO (1990) Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis, vol. 18 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Xing X (1994) Jumping the gun: Imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):992–1044.Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Taleb NN (2007) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, vol. 2 (Random House, New York).Google Scholar