Guaranteed Demand and Corporate R&D

References

• AAAS (2022) Historical trends in federal R&D: National R&D by funder, 1953-2020. Accessed December 6, 2021, https://www.aaas.org/programs/r-d-budget-and-policy/historical-trends-federal-rd.Google Scholar
• Adams JD, Chiang EP, Jensen JL (2003) The influence of federal laboratory R&D on industrial research. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):1003–1020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2018) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021a) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021b) Matching patents to Compustat firms, 1980-2015: Dynamic reassignment, name changes, and ownership structures. Res. Policy 50(5):104217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Cioaca L, Sheer L, Zhang H (2023) The effect of public science on corporate R&D. NBER Working Paper No. 31701, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Arve M, Martimort D (2016) Dynamic procurement under uncertainty: Optimal design and implications for incomplete contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(11):3238–3274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Li D, Sampat BN (2019) Public R&D investments and private-sector patenting: Evidence from NIH funding rules. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):117–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Prat A, Valletti T (2009) Active and passive waste in government spending: Evidence from a policy experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1278–1308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartik TJ (1991) Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies? (WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya V (2021) An empirical model of R&D procurement contests: An analysis of the DOD SBIR program. Econometrica 89(5):2189–2224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Griffith R, Van Reenen J (2002) Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997. J. Public Econom. 85(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J, Williams H (2019) A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. J. Econom. Perspectives 33(3):163–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Jones CI, Van Reenen J, Webb M (2020) Are ideas getting harder to find? Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(4):1104–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carril R, Duggan M (2020) The impact of industry consolidation on government procurement: Evidence from Department of Defense contracting. J. Public Econom. 184(2020):104141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che Y-K, Gale I (2003) Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):646–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che Y-K, Iossa E, Rey P (2021) Prizes versus contracts as incentives for innovation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(5):2149–2178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA (2000) Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Res. Policy 29(4–5):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decarolis F (2014) Awarding price, contract performance, and bids screening: Evidence from procurement auctions. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 6(1):108–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimos C, Pugh G (2016) The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Res. Policy 45(4):797–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dugoua E, Gerarden T, Myers K, Pless J (2022) Creating and steering innovators with supply versus demand policies. Unpublished manuscript, viewed as part of a conference presentation in 2022.Google Scholar
• Edler J, Georghiou L (2007) Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side. Res. Policy 36(7):949–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (2009) Accounting standards codification. Accessed March 14, 2022, https://asc.fasb.org/730.Google Scholar
• Fini R, Perkmann M, Kenney M, Maki KM (2023) Are public subsidies effective for university spinoffs? Evidence from SBIR awards in the University of California system. Res. Policy 52(1):104662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1958) Research costs and social returns: Hybrid corn and related innovations. J. Political Econom. 66(5):419–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (1988) Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica 56(4):755–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (1999) Foundations of incomplete contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(1):115–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howell ST (2017) Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(4):1136–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howell ST, Rathje J, Van Reenen J, Wong JW (2022) Opening up military innovation: Effects of bottom-up reforms to U.S. defense research. Accessed March 25, 2023, https://www.cato.org/research-briefs-economic-policy/opening-military-innovation-effects-bottom-reforms-us-defense.Google Scholar
• Kang K, Miller RA (2022) Winning by default: Why is there so little competition in government procurement? Rev. Econom. Stud. 89(3):1495–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott AM, Josephson B, Lee J-Y (2023) Are federal contractors less innovative? Preprint, submitted December 23, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4528211.Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Levin J, Snyder CM (2022) Designing advance market commitments for new vaccines. Management Sci. 68(7):4786–4814.Link, Google Scholar
• Lanahan L, Joshi AM, Johnson E (2021) Do public R&D subsidies produce jobs? Evidence from the SBIR/STTR program. Res. Policy 50(7):104286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2000) The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. J. Private Equity 3(2):55–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg FR (1988) The private R and D investment response to federal design and technical competitions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(3):550–559.Google Scholar
• Liebman JB, Mahoney N (2017) Do expiring budgets lead to wasteful year-end spending? Evidence from federal procurement. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(11):3510–3549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Link AN (1982) An analysis of the composition of R&D spending. Southern Econom. J. 49(2):342–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manuel KM (2011) Competition in federal contracting: An overview of the legal requirements. Accessed February 25, 2021, https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc31464/.Google Scholar
• Moretti E, Steinwender C, Van Reenen J (2025) The intellectual spoils of war? Defense R&D, productivity, and international spillovers. Rev. Econom. Statist. 107(1):14–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC (2010) Military R&D and innovation. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1219–1256.Google Scholar
• Mowery DC (2012) Defense-related R&D as a model for “grand challenges” technology policies. Res. Policy 41(10):1703–1715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers KR, Lanahan L (2022) Estimating spillovers from publicly funded R&D: Evidence from the US Department of Energy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(7):2393–2423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NCSES (2020) National patterns of R&D resources: 2017–18 data update. Accessed August 23, 2021, https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf20307.Google Scholar
• OECD (2017) Government at a glance 2017. Accessed February 18, 2024, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/gov_glance-2017-en.Google Scholar
• OECD (2022) OECD patent quality indicators database. Accessed March 23, 2022, https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecd-patent-quality-indicators.htm.Google Scholar
• Packalen M, Bhattacharya J (2020) NIH funding and the pursuit of edge science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(22):12011–12016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters HM (2021) Defense primer: U.S. defense industrial base. Accessed February 8, 2021, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/IF10548.pdf.Google Scholar
• Pillai S, Goldfarb B, Kirsch D, Kim S, Starr E (2024) From hypothesis testing towards inference to best explanation: A PEEBI testimonial structure for abductive studies in strategy. Preprint, submitted February 11, 2025, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.Google Scholar
• Rathje JM (2019) Essays on public funding for private innovation. PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Riordan MH, Sappington DE (1989) Second sourcing. RAND J. Econom. 20(1):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson WP (1989) Profit regulation of defense contractors and prizes for innovation. J. Political Econom. 97(6):1284–1305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slavtchev V, Wiederhold S (2016) Does the technological content of government demand matter for private R&D? Evidence from U.S. states. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 8(2):45–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Squicciarini M, Dernis H, Criscuolo C (2013) Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of Technological and Economic Value (OECD Publishing, Paris).Google Scholar
• Sun L, Abraham S (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J. Econometrics 225(2):175–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2021) Gross domestic product: Implicit price deflator [GDPDEF]. Accessed May 9, 2021, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPDEF.Google Scholar
• Wallsten SJ (2000) The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. RAND J. Econom. 31(1):82–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss L (2014) America Inc.? Innovation and Enterprise in the National Security State (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar