The Benefit of the Doubt: Patent Examination Under Strategic Obfuscation

References

• Ashtor JH (2022) Modeling patent clarity. Res. Policy 51(2):104415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atal V, Bar T (2010) Prior art: To search or not to search. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(5):507–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Li D (2022) Scientific grant funding. Innovation and Public Policy (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA), 117.Google Scholar
• Bar T, Gordon S (2014) Optimal project selection mechanisms. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 6(3):227–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Jones CI, Van Reenen J, Webb M (2020) Are ideas getting harder to find? Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(4):1104–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boleslavsky R, Cotton C (2018) Limited capacity in project selection: Competition through evidence production. Econom. Theory 65(2):385–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boleslavsky R, Carlin BI, Cotton C (2019) Disincentive effects of evaluation. Technical report. Working paper. Queen’s University, Kingston, ON.Google Scholar
• Bushee BJ, Gow ID, Taylor DJ (2018) Linguistic complexity in firm disclosures: Obfuscation or information? J. Accounting Res. 56(1):85–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butterworth J (2019) A struggle for the soul of theoretical physics. Nature 568(7752):309–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao S, Jiang W, Yang B, Zhang AL (2023) How to talk when a machine is listening: Corporate disclosure in the age of AI. Rev. Financial Stud. 36(9):3603–3642.Google Scholar
• Che Y-K, Dessein W, Kartik N (2013) Pandering to persuade. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):47–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chubb J, Watermeyer R (2017) Artifice or integrity in the marketization of research impact? Investigating the moral economy of (pathways to) impact statements within research funding proposals in the UK and Australia. Stud. Higher Ed. 42(12):2360–2372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Clippel G, Rozen K (2020) Communication, perception, and strategic obfuscation. Technical report. Working paper. Brown University, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
• Dewatripont M, Tirole J (2005) Modes of communication. J. Political Econom. 113(6):1217–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drake MS, Hales J, Rees L (2019) Disclosure overload? A professional user perspective on the usefulness of general purpose financial statements. Contemporary Accounting Res. 36(4):1935–1965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Wolitzky A (2012) A search cost model of obfuscation. RAND J. Econom. 43(3):417–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frakes MD, Wasserman MF (2017) Is the time allocated to review patent applications inducing examiners to grant invalid patents? Evidence from microlevel application data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(3):550–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frankel A, Kartik N (2019) Muddled information. J. Political Econom. 127(4):1739–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freilich J (2017) Patent clutter. Iowa Law Rev. 103:925–983.Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Wenzel T (2014) Strategic obfuscation and consumer protection policy. J. Indust. Econom. 62(4):632–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Head ML, Holman L, Lanfear R, Kahn AT, Jennions MD (2015) The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biol. 13(3):e1002106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howell ST (2017) Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(4):1136–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iliev R, Axelrod R (2017) The paradox of abstraction: Precision versus concreteness. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 46(3):715–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Luca M, Martin D (2022) Complex disclosure. Management Sci. 68(5):3236–3261.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kartik N (2009) Strategic communication with lying costs. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(4):1359–1395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kartik N, Ottaviani M, Squintani F (2007) Credulity, lies, and costly talk. J. Econom. Theory 134(1):93–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn J, Younge K, Marco A (2020) Patent citations reexamined. RAND J. Econom. 51(1):109–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langinier C, Marcoul P (2020) Monetary and implicit incentives of patent examiners. J. Econom. Bus. 110:105906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrimore L, Jiang L, Larrimore J, Markowitz D, Gorski S (2011) Peer to peer lending: The relationship between language features, trustworthiness, and persuasion success. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 39(1):19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legros P, Newman AF (2002) Courts, contracts, and interference. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(4–5):734–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D (2017) Expertise versus bias in evaluation: Evidence from the NIH. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(2):60–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li F (2008) Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. J. Accounting Econom. 45(2–3):221–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz DM (2019) What words are worth: National Science Foundation grant abstracts indicate award funding. J. Language Soc. Psych. 38(3):264–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz DM, Hancock JT (2016) Linguistic obfuscation in fraudulent science. J. Language Soc. Psych. 35(4):435–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1986) Relying on the information of interested parties. RAND J. Econom. 17(1):18–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosek BA, Spies JR, Motyl M (2012) Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 7(6):615–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez-Richet E, Prady D (2012) Complicating to persuade? Working paper.Google Scholar
• Persson P (2018) Attention manipulation and information overload. Behav. Public Policy 2(1):78–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl K, Strausz R (2017) Certification and market transparency. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(4):1842–1868.Google Scholar
• Vinkers CH, Tijdink JK, Otte WM (2015) Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: Retrospective analysis. British Medical J. 351(8038):h6467.Crossref, Google Scholar