The Power of Knowing a Woman Is in Charge: Lessons from a Randomized Experiment

References

• Anderson ML, Lu F (2017) Learning to manage and managing to learn: The effects of student leadership service. Management Sci. 63(10):3246–3261.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Lavy V (1999) Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):533–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Azmat G, Iriberri N (2012) The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. 58(1):78–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Imbens G (2017) Chapter 3. The econometrics of randomized experiments. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Field Experiments I (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 73–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Bagues M, Cabrales A, Iriberri N (2019) What you don’t know… can’t hurt you: A field experiment on relative performance feedback in higher education. Management Sci. 65(8):3714–3736.Link, Google Scholar
• Bayer A, Rouse CE (2016) Diversity in the economics profession: A new attack on an old problem. J. Econom. Perspect. 30(4):221–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaman L, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P (2012) Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Science 335(6068):582–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaman L, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P (2009) Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1497–1540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1169–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J (2017) Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: Theory and evidence from Sweden. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(8):2204–2242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhalotra S, Clots-Figueras I (2014) Health and the political agency of women. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 6(2):164–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhalotra S, Clots-Figueras I, Iyer L (2018) Pathbreakers? Women’s electoral success and future political participation. Econom. J. (London) 128(613):1844–1878.Google Scholar
• Boring A, Philippe A (2021) Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. J. Public Econom. 193:104323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botev Z, Kroese D, Rubinstein R, L’Ecuyer P (2013) The cross-entropy method for optimization. Handbook Statist. 31:35–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breda T, Grenet J, Monnet M, van Effenterre C (2021) Do female role models reduce the gender gap in science? Evidence from French high schools. IZA Working Paper 13163, Paris School of Economics, Paris.Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Page ME, West JE (2010) Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quart. J. Econom. 125(3):1101–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E (2004) Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 72(5):1409–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Friedman J, Rockoff J (2014) Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(9):2633–2679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E (2012) Women empowerment and economic development. J. Econom. Literature 50(4):1051–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Sczesny S (2009) Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed? Barreto M, Ryan MK, Schmitt MT, eds. The Glass Ceiling in the 21st Century: Understanding Barriers to Gender Equality, Psychology of Women Book Series (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 21–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer C (1999) Read this paper even later: Procrastination with time-consistent preferences. Working Paper 10725, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Fischer C (2001) Read this paper later: Procrastination with time-consistent preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 46(3):249–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gangadharan L, Jain T, Maitra P, Vecci J (2016) Social identity and governance: The behavioral response to female leaders. Eur. Econom. Rev. 90:302–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghani E, Kerr WR, O’Connell SD (2014) Political reservations and women’s entrepreneurship in India. J. Development Econom. 108:138–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanushek E, Kain F, Rivkin G (2005) Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica 2(73):417–458.Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn S, Oosterbeek H, Van Praag M (2013) The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 59(7):1514–1528.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer L, Mani A, Mishra P, Topalova P (2012) The power of political voice: Women’s political representation and crime in India. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 4(4):165–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen R, Oster E (2009) The power of TV: Cable television and women’s status in India. Quart. J. Econom. 124(3):1057–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF, Olken BA (2005) Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):835–864.Google Scholar
• Kalsi P (2017) Seeing is believing—Can increasing the number of female leaders reduce sex selection in rural India? J. Development Econom. 126:1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kofoed MS, McGovney E (2019) The effect of same-gender or same-race role models on occupation choice: Evidence from randomly assigned mentors at West Point. J. Human Resources 54(2):430–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krueger A (1999) Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):497–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kugler A, Tinsley C, Ukhaneva O (2021) Choice of majors: Are women really different from men? Econom. Ed. Rev. 81:102079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–477.Google Scholar
• Laibson D, Harris C (2001) Dynamic choice of hyperbolic consumers. Econometrica 69(4):935–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim J, Meer J (2020) Persistent effects of teacher student gender matches. J. Human Resources 55(3):809–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2019) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. Experiment. Econom. 22(4):773–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1989) A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica 57(5):995–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mengel F, Sauermann J, Zolitz U (2019) Gender bias in teaching evaluations. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 17(2):535–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muralidharan K, Singh A, Ganimian A (2019) Disrupting education? Experimental evidence on technology-aided instruction in India. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(4):1426–1460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Connell SD (2020) Can quotas increase the supply of candidates for higher-level positions? Evidence from local government in India. Rev. Econom. Statist. 102(1):65–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter C, Serra D (2020) Gender differences in the choice of major: The importance of female role models. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 12(3):226–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rask K (2010) Attrition in stem fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences. Econom. Ed. Rev. 29(6):892–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riley E (2024) Role models in movies: The impact of Queen of Katwe on students’ educational attainment. Rev. Econom. Statist., ePub ahead of print January 17, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01153.Google Scholar
• Schmader T (2002) Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38(2):194–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shih MJ, Pittinsky TL, Ho GC (2011) Chapter 9. Stereotype boost: Positive outcomes from the activation of positive stereotypes. Inzlicht M, Schmader T, eds. Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 141–156.Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Program (2020) Tackling social norms: A game changer for gender inequalities. Technical report, 2020 Human Development Perspectives, New York.Google Scholar