How Causal Focus and Specificity in Risk Factor Disclosures Jointly Affect Investor Judgments

References

• Ahn WK (1998) Why are different features central for natural kinds and artifacts? The role of causal status in determining feature centrality. Cognition 69(2):135–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahn WK, Kim NS, Lassaline ME, Dennis MJ (2000) Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality. Cognitive Psych. 41(4):361–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beatty A, Cheng L, Zhang H (2019) Are risk factor disclosures still relevant? Evidence from market reactions to risk factor disclosures before and after the financial crisis. Contemporary Accounting Res. 36(2):805–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JL, Chen H, Dhaliwal DS, Lu H, Steele LB (2014) The information content of mandatory risk factor disclosures in corporate filings. Rev. Accounting Stud. 19(1):396–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis-Friday PY, Liu C, Mittelstaedt HF (2004) Recognition and disclosure reliability: Evidence from SFAS No. 106. Contemporary Accounting Res. 21(2):399–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Der Kiureghian A, Ditlevsen O (2009) Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety 31(2):105–112. Google Scholar
• Dyer T, Lang M, Stice-Lawrence L (2017) The evolution of 10-K textual disclosures: Evidence from latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Accounting Res. 64(2–3):221–245.Google Scholar
• Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM (1986) Judging probable cause. Psych. Bull. 99(1):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliott WB, Hodge FD, Kennedy JJ, Pronk M (2007) Are M.B.A students a good proxy for nonprofessional investors? Accounting Rev. 82(1):139–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elshandidy T, Shrives PJ, Bamber M, Abraham S (2018) Risk reporting: A review of the literature and implications for future research. J. Accounting Literature 40(1):54–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell AM, Grenier JH, Leiby J (2017) Scoundrels or stars? Theory and evidence on the quality of workers in online labor markets. Accounting Rev. 92(1):93–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filzen JJ (2015) The information content of risk factor disclosures in quarterly report. Accounting Horizons 29(4):887–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition, 2nd ed. (McGraw Hill, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Ülkümen G (2011) Distinguishing two dimensions of uncertainty. Brun W, Karen G, Kirkebøen G, Montgomery H, eds. Perspective on Thinking, Judging, and Decision Making (Universitesforlaget, Olso, Norway), 21–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Goedde-Menke M, Tannenbaum D (2021) Ambiguity aversion is aversion to epistemic uncertainty. Working paper, UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
• Frederickson JR, Hodge FD, Pratt JH (2006) The evolution of stock option accounting: Disclosure, voluntary recognition, mandated recognition, and managerial disavowals. Accounting Rev. 81(5):1073–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedlander J (2004) Abstract, concrete, general, and specific terms. Accessed February 7, 2023, https://www.ftf.lth.se/fileadmin/ftf/Course_pages/Faff15/Filer/Friedlander_-_Abstract__Concrete__General__and_Specific_Terms.pdf.Google Scholar
• Goodman JK, Paolacci G (2017) Crowdsourcing consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 44(1):196–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greville WJ, Buehner MJ (2007) The influence of temporal distributions on causal induction from tabular data. Memory Cognition 35(3):444–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hacking I (1975) The Emergency of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2022) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 3rd ed. (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Heinle M, Smith K (2017) A theory of risk disclosure. Rev. Accounting Stud. 22(4):1459–1491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinle M, Smith K, Verrecchia R (2018) Risk-factor disclosure and asset prices. Accounting Rev. 93(2):191–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirst DE, Hopkins PE (1998) Comprehensive income reporting and analysts’ valuation judgments. J. Accounting Res. 36(3):47–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodder L, Hopkins PE, Wood DA (2008) The effects of financial statement and information complexity on analysts’ cash flow forecasts. Accounting Rev. 83(4):915–956.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hope OK, Hu D, Lu H (2016) The benefits of specific risk-factor disclosures. Rev. Accounting Stud. 21(4):1005–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houghton Mifflin (2011) American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th ed. (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston).Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (2018) ISO 31000:2018, Risk Management–Guidelines (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva).Google Scholar
• Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute (2016) The Corporate Risk Factor Disclosure Landscape (Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute, New York).Google Scholar
• Johnson S (2010) SEC pushes companies for more risk information. CFO Online (August 10), https://www.cfo.com/risk-compliance/2010/08/sec-pushes-companies-for-more-risk-information/.Google Scholar
• Koonce L, Leitter Z, White BJ (2019) Linked balance sheet presentation. J. Accounting Econom. 68(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koonce L, Seybert N, Smith J (2011) Causal reasoning in financial reporting and voluntary disclosures. Accounting Organ. Soc. 36(4–5):209–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kravet TD, Muslu V (2013) Textual risk disclosures and investors’ risk perceptions. Rev. Accounting Stud. 18(4):1088–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krische S (2019) Investment experience, financial literacy, and investment-related judgments. Contemporary Accounting Res. 26(3):1634–1668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyle MR, Riedl EJ, Siano F (2023) Changes in risk factor disclosures and the variance risk premium. Accounting Rev. 98(6):327–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maines LA, McDaniel LS (2000) Effects of comprehensive-income characteristics on nonprofessional investors’ judgments: The role of financial-statement presentation format. Accounting Rev. 75(2):179–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noordman LG, Vonk W (1998) Memory-based processing in understanding causal information. Discourse Processes 26(2–3):191–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patel B (2018) Risks of misunderstanding cyber security. Finextra Research Online (January 19), https://www.finextra.com/blogposting/14946/risk-of-misunderstanding-cyber-security.Google Scholar
• Plous S (1993) The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, 1st ed. (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Power B (2014) Writing good risk statements. ISACA J. 3:42–44.Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proctor C, Ahn WK (2007) The effects of causal likelihood on judgments of the likelihood of unknown features. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 14(4):635–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rennekamp K (2012) Processing fluency and investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. J. Accounting Res. 50(5):1319–1354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robbins RB, Rothenberg PL (2006) Writing risk factor disclosure in exchange act report. Insights Corporate Securities Law Advisor 19(5):9–16.Google Scholar
• Robertson I, Warr A (2016) Why we need a new approach to cyber-security and risk assessment. Accessed April 27, 2016, https://warwick.ac.uk/research/priorities/cyber/blogs/?newsItem=094d4345545364160154580bc4622c40.Google Scholar
• Roese NJ, Vohs KD (2012) Hindsight bias. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 7(5):411–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schrand LM, Elliott JM (1998) Risk and financial reporting: A summary of the discussion at the 1997 AAA/FASB Conference. Accounting Horizons 12(3):271–282.Google Scholar
• Schwartz MJ (2017) SEC chairman seeks more cyber risk disclosure. Accessed December 18, 2024, https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/sec-chairman-seeks-more-cyber-risk-disclosure-a-10261.Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2004) Securities offering reform. Release No. 33-8501, 34-50624, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2005) Securities offering reform. Release No. 33-8591, 34-52056, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2011) CF disclosure guidance topics: Topic no. 2. cybersecurity, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2016) SEC concept releases: Business and financial disclosure required by regulation S-K. Release No. 33-10064, 34-77599, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2018) Commission statement and guidance on public company cybersecurity disclosures. Release No. 33-10409, 34-82746, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2020) Modernization of regulation S-K items 101, 103, and 105. Release No. 33-10825, 34-89670, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• SecurityScorecard (2016) 2016 Financial Industry Cybersecurity Report, SecurityScorecard, New York.Google Scholar
• Sweller J (2011) Cognitive load theory. Mestre JP, Ross BH, eds. Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA), 37–76.Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum D, Fox CR, Ülkümen G (2017) Judgment extremity and accuracy under epistemic vs. aleatory uncertainty. Management Sci. 63(2):497–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Trabasso T, Secco T, Van den Broek PW (1984) Causal cohesion and story coherence. Mandl H, Stein NL, Trabasso T, eds. Learning and the Comprehension of Text (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 83–111.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1980) Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty. Fishbein M, eds. Progress in Social Psychology (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 49–72.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ülkümen G, Fox CR, Malle BF (2016) Two dimensions of subjective uncertainty: Clues from natural language. J. Experiment. Psych. General 145(10):1280–1297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Broek P (1990) Causal inferences and the comprehension of narrative texts. Graesser AC, Bower GH, eds. Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA), 175–196.Google Scholar
• Vives ML, FeldmanHall O (2018) Tolerance to ambiguous uncertainty predicts prosocial behavior. Nature Comm. 9(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walters DJ, Ülkümen G, Tannenbaum D, Erner C, Fox CR (2023) Investor behavior under epistemic vs. aleatory uncertainty. Management Sci. 69(5):2547–3155.Google Scholar