Reshaping Corporate Boards Through Mandatory Gender Diversity Disclosures: Evidence from Canada

References

• Adams R, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94(2):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilar L (2010) Speech by SEC commissioner: Diversity in the boardroom is important and unfortunately still rare. Accessed September 16, 2010, https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2010/spch091610laa.htm.Google Scholar
• Ahern K, Dittmar D (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar J, Duro M, Kadach I, Ormazabal G (2021) The big three and corporate carbon emissions around the world. J. Financial Econom. 142(2):674–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsam S, Puthenpurackal J, Upadhyay A (2016) The determinants and performance impact of outside board leadership. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 51(4):1325–1358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billings MB, Klein A, Shi YC (2022) Investors’ response to the #MeToo movement: Does corporate culture matter? Rev. Accounting Stud. 27:897–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2012) 2011 Catalyst census: Financial post 500 women board directors (Report). https://www.catalst.org/research.Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2018a) Legislative board diversity. https://www.catalyst.org/legislative-board-diversity.Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2018b) Regulatory board diversity. https://www.catalyst.org/regulatory-board-diversity.Google Scholar
• Chen G, Crossland C, Huang S (2016) Female board representation and corporate acquisition intensity. Strategic Management J. 37(2):303–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen YC, Hung M, Wang Y (2018) The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. J. Accounting Econom. 65(1):169–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Liao S, Zhang H (2013) The commitment effect versus information effect of disclosure—Evidence from smaller reporting companies. Accounting Rev. 88(4):1239–1263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen HB, Floyd E, Liu LY, Maffett M (2017) The real effects of mandated information on social responsibility in financial reports: Evidence from mine-safety records. J. Accounting Econom. 64(2–3):284–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarkson ME (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Management Rev. 20(1):92–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn J, Liu Z, Wardlaw M (2022) Count (and count-like) data in finance. J. Financial Econom. 146(2):529–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cumming D, Leung TY, Rui O (2015) Gender diversity and securities fraud. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1572–1593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond M, Hu X, Hung M, Li S (2011) The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. J. Accounting Econom. 51(3):240–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deloitte (2017) Women in the Boardroom: A Global Perspective. 5th ed. (Global Center for Corporate Governance, Deloitte, London).Google Scholar
• Denes MR, Karpoff JM, McWilliams VB (2017) Thirty years of shareholder activism: A survey of empirical research. J. Corporate Finance 44:405–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimson E, Karakaş O, Li X (2015) Active ownership. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(12):3225–3268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downar B, Ernstberger J, Reichelstein S, Schwenen S, Zaklan A (2021) The impact of carbon disclosure mandates on emissions and financial operating performance. Rev. Accounting Stud. 26:1137–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doyle J, Ge W, McVay S (2007) Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 44(1–2):193–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Lins KV, Roth L, Wagner HF (2019) Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. J. Financial Econom. 131(3):693–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckbo BE, Nygaard K, Thorburn KS (2022) Valuation effects of Norway’s board gender quota law revisited. Management Sci. 68(6):4112–4134.Link, Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021) Impact assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/34/EU, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Commission Staff working document. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52021SC0150.Google Scholar
• Fauver L, Hung M, Taboada AG, Wang E (2024) Boardroom gender diversity reforms and institutional monitoring: Global evidence. Rev. Accounting Stud. 29:621–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fracassi C, Tate G (2012) External networking and internal firm governance. J. Finance 67(1):153–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gormley TA, Gupta V, Matsa DA, Mortal S, Yang L (2023) The Big Three and board gender diversity: The effectiveness of shareholder voice. J. Financial Econom. 149(2):323–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal J, Riedl E, Serafeim G (2019) Market reaction to mandatory nonfinancial disclosure. Management Sci. 65(7):2947–3448.Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1980) Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell J. Econom. 11(1):42–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul FA, Srinidhi B, Ng AC (2011) Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? J. Accounting Econom. 51(3):314–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Wowak AJ, Boeker W (2022) Corporate directors as heterogeneous network pipes: How director political ideology affects the interorganizational diffusion of governance practices. Strategic Management J. 43(8):1469–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hainmueller J, Xu Y (2013) Ebalance: A Stata package for entropy balancing. J. Statist. Software 54(7):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hung M, Li X, Wang S (2015) Post-earnings-announcement drift in global markets: Evidence from an information shock. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(4):1242–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Insightia (2022) The proxy voting annual review 2022. https://docs.insightia.com/issues/2022_10_27_Insightia_PVAR_2022.pdf.Google Scholar
• Jeffrey J, MacDougall A, Valley J (2019) Canada is first jurisdiction worldwide to require diversity disclosure beyond gender; Diversity disclosure rules will apply to federally incorporated public companies effective Jan. 1, 2020. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP. https://www.osler.com/PDFs/Resource/en-ca/Canada-is-first-jurisdiction-worldwide-to-require.pdf.Google Scholar
• Jiang W (2023) Diversity through turnover: How to overcome the glacial pace toward board diversity? J. Law Finance Accounting 7(2):165–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim D, Starks LT (2016) Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):267–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knippen JM, Shen W, Zhu Q (2019) Limited progress? The effect of external pressure for board gender diversity on the increase of female directors. Strategic Management J. 40(7):1123–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levi M, Li K, Zhang F (2014) Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. J. Corporate Finance 28:185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu S (2019) Quota or disclosure? Evidence from corporate board gender diversity policies. Preprint, submitted December 9, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493375.Google Scholar
• Lys T, Naughton JP, Wang C (2015) Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 60(1):56–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5(3):136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMullin JL, Schonberger B (2020) Entropy-balanced accruals. Rev. Accounting Stud. 25:84–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Middlemiss N (2016) Tim Hortons under pressure to improve board diversity. Human Resources Director News (June 9), https://www.hcamag.com/ca/news/general/tim-hortons-under-pressure-to-improve-board-diversity/127881.Google Scholar
• Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) (2013) OSC staff consultation paper 58-401. July 30, 2013.Google Scholar
• Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) (2014) Proposed OSC amendments to form 58-101F1 corporate governance disclosure of national instrument 58-101 disclosure of corporate governance practices proposed disclosure requirements regarding the representation of women on boards and in senior management, January 16, 2014, Volume 37, Issue 3 (Supp-1).Google Scholar
• She G (2022) The real effects of mandatory nonfinancial disclosure: Evidence from supply chain transparency. Accounting Rev. 97(5):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinidhi B, Gul F, Tsui J (2011) Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Res. 28(5):1610–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada (2011) Census profile. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/index-eng.cfm.Google Scholar
• Sull D (2003) Managing by commitments. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(6):82–91.Google Scholar
• Tan H, Wang S, Welker M (2011) Analyst following and forecast accuracy after mandated IFRS adoptions. J. Accounting Res. 49(5):1307–1357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2024) SEC adopts rules to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures for investors. https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2024-31.Google Scholar
• Verrecchia RE (1983) Discretionary disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. 5:179–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar