Base Rate Neglect as a Source of Inaccurate Statistical Discrimination

References

• Arrow K (1971) Some models of racial discrimination in the labor market. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM6253.html.Google Scholar
• Bar-Hillel M (1980) The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica 44(3):211–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, McKelvey B (2006) Analysis of extremes in management studies. Ketchen DJ, Bergh DD, eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, vol. 3 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 123–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Benjamin D, Bodoh-Creed A, Rabin M (2019) Base-rate neglect: Foundations and implications. Working paper, Stony Brook Center for Game Theory, Stony Brook, NY.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E (2017) Field experiments on discrimination. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 309–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3395–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Haggag K, Imas A, Pope DG (2023) Inaccurate statistical discrimination: An identification problem. Rev. Econom. Statist. 107(3):605–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Stereotypes. Quart. J. Econom. 131(4):1753–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, González AL, Yanagizawa-Drott D (2020) Misperceived social norms: Women working outside the home in Saudi Arabia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(10):2997–3029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2014) Gender, competitiveness, and career choices. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1409–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Peter N, Wolter SC (2017) Gender, competitiveness, and study choices in high school: Evidence from Switzerland. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):125–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chater N, Loewenstein G (2022) The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray. Behavioral Brain Sci. 46:e147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Exley CL, Niederle M (2021) The role of beliefs in driving gender discrimination. Management Sci. 67(6):3551–3569.Link, Google Scholar
• Collins JC (2001) Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap … And Others Don’t, 1st ed. (HarperBusiness, New York).Google Scholar
• Dannals JE, Miller DT (2017) Social norm perception in groups with outliers. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 146(9):1342–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Kessler JB (2024) Motivated errors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 114(4):961–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C, Gneezy U (2001) Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):351–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S (1980) Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 38(6):889–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forgues B (2012) Sampling on the dependent variable is not always that bad: Quantitative case-control designs for strategic organization research. Strategic Organ. 10(3):269–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladwell M (2008) Outliers: The Story of Success (Little, Brown and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golman R, Loewenstein G, Molnar A, Saccardo S (2022) The demand for, and avoidance of, information. Management Sci. 68(9):6454–6476.Link, Google Scholar
• Hedegaard MS, Tyran J-R (2018) The price of prejudice. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 10(1):40–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilton JL, von Hippel W (1996) Stereotypes. Annual Rev. Psych. 47(1):237–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huck S, Szech N, Wenner LM (2015) More effort with less pay: On information avoidance, belief design and performance. Working paper series in economics, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
• Isaac MS, Schindler RM (2014) The top-ten effect: Consumers’ subjective categorization of ranked lists. J. Consumer Res. 40(6):1181–1202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen R (2010) The (perceived) returns to education and the demand for schooling. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):515–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Frederick S (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 49–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psych. Rev. 80(4):237–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane R (2019) Opportunity missed: Reflecting on the lack of women on our most innovative leaders list. Forbes (September 8), https://www.forbes.com/sites/randalllane/2019/09/08/opportunity-missed-reflecting-on-the-lack-of-women-on-our-most-innovative-leaders-list/.Google Scholar
• Locksley A, Ortiz V, Hepburn C (1980) Social categorization and discriminatory behavior: Extinguishing the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5):773–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyon D, Slovic P (1976) Dominance of accuracy information and neglect of base rates in probability estimation. Acta Psychologica 40(4):287–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDermott R (2023) On the scientific study of small samples: Challenges confronting quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Leadership Quart. 34(3):101675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B, Andriani P (2005) Why Gaussian statistics are mostly wrong for strategic organization. Strategic Organ. 3(2):219–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer A, Frederick S (2023) The formation and revision of intuitions. Cognition 240:105380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer A, Zhou E, Frederick S (2018) The non-effects of repeated exposure to the cognitive reflection test. Judgment Decision Making 13(3):246–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson TE, Biernat MR, Manis M (1990) Everyday base rates (sex stereotypes): Potent and resilient. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(4):664–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennycook G, Trippas D, Handley SJ, Thompson VA (2014) Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 40(2):544–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
• Ruscio J (2008) A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors. Psych. Methods 13(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samek A (2019) Gender differences in job entry decisions: A university-wide field experiment. Management Sci. 65(7):3272–3281.Link, Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH (2006) The Production of Knowledge: The Challenge of Social Science Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stengård E, Juslin P, Hahn U, Van Den Berg R (2022) On the generality and cognitive basis of base-rate neglect. Cognition 226:105160.Crossref, Google Scholar