Machine Data: Market and Analytics

References

• Alam F, Mehmood R, Katib I, Albogami NN, Albeshri A (2017) Data fusion and IoT for smart ubiquitous environments: A survey. IEEE Access 5:9533–9554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amir R, Liu H, Machowska D, Resende J (2019) Spillovers, subsidies, and second-best socially optimal R&D. J. Public Econom. Theory 21(6):1200–1220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson GM, Shughart WF, Tollison RD (2004) The economic theory of clubs. Rowley CK, Schneider F, eds. The Encyclopedia of Public Choice (Springer, Boston), 499–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atik C, Martens B (2021) Competition problems and governance of non-personal agricultural machine data: Comparing voluntary initiatives in the US and EU. EUR Scientific and Technical Research Reports, JIPITEC 370 para 1.Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Bonatti A, Gan T (2022) The economics of social data. RAND J. Econom. 53(2):263–296.Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD, Peleg B, Whinston MD (1987) Coalition-proof Nash equilibria I. Concepts. J. Econom. Theory 42(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruckner A, Ostrow E (1962) Some function classes related to the class of convex functions. Pacific J. Math. 12(4):1203–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvano E, Calzolari G, Denicolò V, Pastorello S (2020) Artificial intelligence, algorithmic pricing, and collusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(10):3267–3297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carballa Smichowski B, Lefouili Y, Mantovani A, Reggiani C (2023) Data sharing or algorithm sharing? Preprint, submitted September 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4641819.Google Scholar
• Cornes R, Hartley R (2007) Aggregative public good games. J. Public Econom. Theory 9(2):201–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosis A, Sand-Zantman W (2023) The ownership of data. J. Law Econom. Organ. 39(3):615–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drexl J (2017) Designing competitive markets for industrial data. Between propertisation and access. JIPITEC 8(4):257–292.Google Scholar
• Duch-Brown N, Martens B, Mueller-Langer F (2017) The economics of ownership, access and trade in digital data. JRC Digital Economy Working Paper 2017-01, Joint Research Centre, Brussels.Google Scholar
• EU Parliament and Council (1995) On the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Directive 95/45. European Union, Brussels.Google Scholar
• EU Parliament and Council (2018) Framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union. Regulation 2018/1807. European Union, Brussels.Google Scholar
• EU Parliament and Council (2023) On harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 (Data Act). Regulation 2023/2854. European Union, Brussels.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions “Building a European Data Economy.” Communication COM/2017/09. European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Farboodi M, Mihet R, Philippon T, Veldkamp L (2019) Big data and firm dynamics. AEA Papers Proc. 109:38–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Heaton S, Novelli E, Teece DJ (2021) Profiting from enabling technologies? Strategy Sci. 6(1):75–90.Link, Google Scholar
• Graef I, Prüfer J (2021) Governance of data sharing: A law & economics proposal. Res. Policy 50(9):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graef I, Gellert R, Purtova N, Husovec M (2018) Feedback to the Commission’s proposal on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data. Preprint, submitted January 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3106791.Google Scholar
• Hao K (2021) Andrew Ng: Forget about building an AI-first business. Start with a mission. MIT Tech. Rev. (March 26), https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/03/26/1021258/ai-pioneer-andrew-ng-machine-learning-business/.Google Scholar
• Ichihashi S (2020) Online privacy and information disclosure by consumers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(2):569–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Rhodes A, Wildenbeest MR (2023) Platform design when sellers use pricing algorithms. Econometrica 91(5):1841–1879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones CI, Tonetti C (2020) Nonrivalry and the economics of data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2819–2858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerber W (2016) A new (intellectual) property right for non-personal data? An economic analysis. MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 37-2016, Phillips-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.Google Scholar
• Kerber W (2023) Governance of IoT data: Why the EU data act will not fulfill its objectives. GRUR Internat. 72(2):120–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• López AL, Vives X (2019) Overlapping ownership, R&D spillovers, and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. 127(5):2394–2437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meng T, Jing X, Yan Z, Pedrycz W (2020) A survey on machine learning for data fusion. Inform. Fusion 57:115–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TM (1999) Machine learning and data mining. Comm. ACM 42(11):30–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mumuni A, Mumuni F (2022) Data augmentation: A comprehensive survey of modern approaches. Array 16:1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prüfer J, Schottmüller C (2021) Competing with big data. J. Indust. Econom. 69(4):967–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rey P, Vergé T (2004) Bilateral control with vertical contracts. RAND J. Econom. 35(4):728–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaefer M, Sapi G (2023) Complementarities in learning from data: Insights from general search. Inform. Econom. Policy 65:1–19.Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (2020) Share to gain: Unlocking data value in manufacturing. White Paper, World Economic Forum, Geneva.Google Scholar
• Zech H (2016) Data as a tradeable commodity. De Franceschi A, ed. European Contract Law and the Digital Single Market (Intersentia, Cambridge, UK), 51–80.Crossref, Google Scholar