The Effect of a System for Sharing Best Practices Within Pre-Existing Peer Networks

References

• Aboelmaged MG (2018) Knowledge sharing through enterprise social network (ESN) systems: Motivational drivers and their impact on employees’ productivity. J. Knowledge Management 22(2):362–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Rasheed A, Berri J (2016) Effective reuse and sharing of best teaching practices. Comput. Appl. Engrg. Ed. 25(2):163–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SW, Kimball A (2019) Evidence for the feedback role of performance measurement systems. Management Sci. 65(9):4385–4406.Link, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB (1998) Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 14(2):18–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey M, Cao R, Kuchler T, Stroebel J, Wong A (2018) Social connectedness: Measurement, determinants, and effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(3):259–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2011) Field experiments with firms. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(3):63–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansler JP, Havn EC (2003) Building community knowledge systems: An empirical study of the IT-support for sharing best practices among managers. Knowledge Process Management 10(3):156–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baptista R (2000) Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 18(3):515–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bawden D, Robinson L (2009) The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. J. Inform. Sci. 35(2):180–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brzozowski MJ, Sandholm T, Hogg T (2009) Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media. GROUP ‘09 Proc. Assoc. Comput. Machinery 2009 Special Interest Group Computer–Human Interaction Internat. Conf. Supporting Group Work (May 2009) (ACM, New York), 61–70.Google Scholar
• Butt MN, Antia KD, Murtha BR, Kashyap V (2018) Clustering, knowledge sharing, and intrabrand competition: A multiyear analysis of an evolving franchise system. J. Marketing 82(1):74–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao X, Sun J (2018) Exploring the effect of overload on the discontinuous intention of social media users: An S-O-R perspective. Comput. Human Behav. 81:10–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce P, Lourenço SM, Martínez-Jerez FA (2017) The performance effect of feedback frequency and detail: Evidence from a field experiment in customer satisfaction. J. Accounting Res. 55(5):1051–1088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charki M-H, Boukef N, Harrison S (2018) Maximizing the impact of enterprise social media. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/maximizing-the-impact-of-enterprise-social-media.Google Scholar
• Chen X, Wei S (2019) Enterprise social media use and overload: A curvilinear relationship. J. Inform. Tech. 34(1):22–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin PY, Evans N, Liu CZ, Choo K-KR (2020) Understanding factors influencing employees’ consumptive and contributive use of enterprise social networks. Inform. Systems Frontiers 22(6):1357–1376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1996) The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. 7(2):119–135.Link, Google Scholar
• Deller S, Sandino T (2020) Effects of a tournament incentive plan incorporating managerial discretion in a geographically dispersed organization. Management Sci. 66(2):911–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Demski JS, Feltham GA (1976) Cost Determination: A Conceptual Approach (The Iowa-State University Press, Ames).Google Scholar
• Eppler MJ, Mengis J (2004) The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inform. Soc. 20(5):325–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erhart R, Mahlendorf M, Reimer M, Schaffer U (2017) Theorizing and testing bidirectional effects: The relationship between strategy formation and involvement of controllers. Accounting Organ. Soc. 61:36–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Floyd E, List JA (2016) Using field experiments in accounting and finance. J. Accounting Res. 54(2):437–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorla N, Somers TM, Wong B (2010) Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 19(3):207–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanna R, Mullainathan S, Schwartzstein J (2014) Learning through noticing: Theory and evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1311–1353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Singh PV, Ghose A (2015) A structural model of employee behavioral dynamics in enterprise social media. Management Sci. 61(12):2825–2844.Link, Google Scholar
• Kontopantelis E, Doran T, Springate D, Buchan I, Reeves D (2015) Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: Interrupted time series analysis. British Medical J. 350:1–4. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lam A, Lambermont-Ford J-P (2010) Knowledge sharing in organizational contexts: A motivation-based perspective. J. Knowledge Management 14(1):51–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lam H, Yeung A, Cheng TCE (2016) The impact of firms’ social media initiatives on operational efficiency and innovativeness. J. Oper. Management 47–48(1):28–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Huysman M, Steinfield C (2013) Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. J. Computer-Mediated Comm. 19(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2012) How knowledge transfer impacts performance: A multilevel model of benefits and liabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1748–1766.Link, Google Scholar
• Li SX, Sandino T (2018) Effects of an information sharing system on employee creativity, engagement, and performance. J. Accounting Res. 56(2):713–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linden A (2015) Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single-and multiple-group comparisons. Stata J. 15(2):480–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manthei K, Sliwka D, Vogelsang T (2023) Information, incentives, and attention: A field experiment of the interaction of management controls. Accounting Rev. 98(5):455–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge PR (1990) Theoretical and analytical issues in studying organizational processes. Organ. Sci. 1(4):406–430.Link, Google Scholar
• Neeley TB, Leonardi PM (2018) Enacting knowledge strategy through social media: Passable trust and the paradox of nonwork interactions. Strategic Management J. 39(3):922–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Dell C, Grayson CJ (1998) If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of internal best practices. Calif. Management Rev. 40(3):154–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary DE (2007) Empirical analysis of the evolution of a taxonomy for best practices. Decision Support Systems 43(4):1650–1663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl C, Berger T, Böhm M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2018) Archetypes of enterprise social network users. Proc. 51st Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci.Google Scholar
• Oleson J (2013) The rise of the enterprise social consultant. Wired. https://www.wired.com/insights/2013/11/the-rise-of-the-enterprise-social-consultant/.Google Scholar
• Sandvik JJ, Saouma RE, Seegert NT, Stanton CT (2020) Workplace knowledge flows. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1635–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson CW, Prusak L (1995) Troubles with information overload—Moving from quantity to quality in information provision. Internat. J. Inform. Management 15(6):413–425.Google Scholar
• Singh J, Hansen MT, Podolny JM (2010) The world is not small for everyone: Inequity in searching for knowledge in organizations. Management Sci. 56(9):1415–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.Link, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko MML, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar