Strategic Behavior with Tight, Loose, and Polarized Norms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01022

References

  • Adriani F , Sonderegger S (2019) A theory of esteem based peer pressure. Games Econom. Behav. 115:314–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ai W , Chen Y , Mei Q , Ye J , Zhang L (2023) Putting teams into the gig economy: A field experiment at a ride-sharing platform. Management Sci. 69(9):5336–5353.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Artinger F , Exadaktylos F , Koppel H , Sääksvuori L (2010) Applying quadratic scoring rule transparently in multiple choice settings: A note. Technical report, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Aycinena D , Rentschler L , Beranek B , Schulz JF (2022) Social norms and dishonesty across societies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(31):e2120138119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balafoutas L , Nikiforakis N (2012) Norm enforcement in the city: A natural field experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 56(8):1773–1785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balafoutas L , Nikiforakis N , Rockenbach B (2014) Direct and indirect punishment among strangers in the field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(45):15924–15927.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bardsley N (2000) Control without deception: Individual behaviour in free-riding experiments revisited. Experiment. Econom. 3(3):215–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barr A , Dekker M , Mwansa F , Zuze TL (2020) Financial decision-making, gender and social norms in Zambia: Preliminary report on the quantitative data generation, analysis and results. Working paper, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  • Bašić Z , Verrina E (2020) Personal norms-and not only social norms-shape economic behavior. Working paper, MAX Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Basu K (1998) Social norms and the law. Newman P , ed. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
  • Bauer K , Chen Y , Hett F , Kosfeld M (2024) Group identity and belief formation: A decomposition of political polarization. Preprint, submitted January 17, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4692411.Google Scholar
  • Belle N , Cantarelli P (2021) Nudging public employees through descriptive social norms in healthcare organizations. Public Admin. Rev. 81(4):589–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berg Pd , Molleman L , Junikka J , Puurtinen M , Weissing FJ (2015) Human cooperation in groups: Variation begets variation. Sci. Rep. 5(1):1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bicchieri C (2005) The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bicchieri C , Chavez A (2010) Behaving as expected: Public information and fairness norms. J. Behav. Decision Making 23(2):161–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bicchieri C , Dimant E (2019) Nudging with care: The risks and benefits of social information. Public Choice. 191(3):443–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bicchieri C , Dimant E (2023) Norm-nudging: Harnessing social expectations for behavior change. Preprint, submitted December 6, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4418351.Google Scholar
  • Bicchieri C , Xiao E (2009) Do the right thing: But only if others do so. J. Behav. Decision Making 22(2):191–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bicchieri C , Dimant E , Gächter S , Nosenzo D (2022) Social proximity and the erosion of norm compliance. Games Econom. Behav. 132:59–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bicchieri C , Dimant E , Gelfand M , Sonderegger S (2023) Social norms and behavior change: The interdisciplinary research frontier. J. Econon. Behav. Organ. 205:A4–A7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bigoni M , Suetens S (2012) Feedback and dynamics in public good experiments. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 82(1):86–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Binmore K , Samuelson L (1994) An economist’s perspective on the evolution of norms. J. Institutional Theoretical Econom. 150(1):45–63.Google Scholar
  • Bowles S , Gintis H (2013) A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Burks SV , Krupka EL (2012) A multimethod approach to identifying norms and normative expectations within a corporate hierarchy: Evidence from the financial services industry. Management Sci. 58(1):203–217.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bursztyn L , Egorov G , Fiorin S (2020) From extreme to mainstream: The erosion of social norms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(11):3522–3548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G , Hong Y , Bapna R , Griskevicius V (2018) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Callander S , Carbajal JC (2022) Cause and effect in political polarization: A dynamic analysis. J. Political Econom. 130(4):825–880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Capraro V , Jagfeld G , Klein R , Mul M , de Pol Iv (2019) Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges. Sci. Rep. 9(1):1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Catola M , D’Alessandro S , Guarnieri P , Pizziol V (2021) Personal norms in the online public good game. Econom. Lett. 207(110024):110024.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G , Samek A , van de Ven J (2022) What is considered deception in experimental economics? Experiment. Econom. 25(2):385–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhuri A , Paichayontvijit T (2006) Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to a public good. Econom. Bull. 3(8):1–14.Google Scholar
  • Chaudhuri A , Paichayontvijit T , Smith A (2017) Belief heterogeneity and contributions decay among conditional cooperators in public goods games. J. Econom. Psych. 58:15–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y , Harper FM , Konstan J , Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on movielens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chetty R (2006) A new method of estimating risk aversion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1821–1834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheung SL (2014) New insights into conditional cooperation and punishment from a strategy method experiment. Experiment. Econom. 17(1):129–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB , Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB , Reno RR , Kallgren CA (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croson RT (2007) Theories of commitment, altruism and reciprocity: Evidence from linear public goods games. Econom. Inquiry 45(2):199–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cullen Z , Perez-Truglia R (2023) The salary taboo privacy norms and the diffusion of information. J. Public Econom. 222:104890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • d’Adda G , Dufwenberg M , Passarelli F , Tabellini G (2020) Social norms with private values: Theory and experiments. Games Econom. Behav. 124:288–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danilov A , Sliwka D (2017) Can contracts signal social norms? experimental evidence. Management Sci. 63(2):459–476.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Danilov A , Khalmetski K , Sliwka D (2021) Descriptive norms and guilt aversion. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 191:293–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeGroot MH (2005) Optimal Statistical Decisions (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Dimant E (2019) Contagion of pro-and anti-social behavior among peers and the role of social proximity. J. Econom. Psych. 73:66–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dimant E (2023a) Beyond average: A method for measuring the tightness, looseness, and polarization of social norms. Econom. Lett. 233:111417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dimant E (2023b) Hate trumps love: The impact of political polarization on social preferences. Management Sci. 70(1):1–31.Google Scholar
  • Dimant E , Shalvi S (2022) Meta-nudging honesty: Past, present, and future of the research frontier. Curr. Opinion Psych. 47:101426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dimant E , Clemente EG , Pieper D , Dreber A , Gelfand M (2022) Politicizing mask-wearing: Predicting the success of behavioral interventions among republicans and democrats in the us. Sci. Rep. 12(1):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elster A , Gelfand MJ (2021) When guiding principles do not guide: The moderating effects of cultural tightness on value-behavior links. J. Personality 89(2):325–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enke B (2020) Moral values and voting. J. Political Econom. 128(10):3679–3729.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E , Gächter S (2000) Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspective 14(3):159–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E , Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E , Schurtenberger I (2018) Normative foundations of human cooperation. Nature Human Behav. 2(7):458–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldhaus C , Sobotta T , Werner P (2019) Norm uncertainty and voluntary payments in the field. Management Sci. 65(4):1855–1866.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiala L , Suetens S (2017) Transparency and cooperation in repeated dilemma games: A meta study. Experiment. Econom. 20:755–771.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U , Gächter S (2006) Heterogeneous social preferences and the dynamics of free riding in public goods. Preprint, submitted March, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.874928.Google Scholar
  • Fischbacher U , Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):541–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U , Gächter S , Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econom. Lett. 71(3):397–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fosgaard TR, Hansen LG, Wengström E (2023) Norm compliance in an uncertain world. J. Behavioral Experiment. Econom. 107:102083.Google Scholar
  • Frey BS , Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1717–1722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gächter S , Herrmann B , Thöni C (2010) Culture and cooperation. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. London B Biological Sci. 365(1553):2651–2661.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gächter S , Kölle F , Quercia S (2017) Reciprocity and the tragedies of maintaining and providing the commons. Nature Human Behav. 1(9):650–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelfand MJ (2021) Cultural evolutionary mismatches in response to collective threat. Curr. Directive Psych. Sci. 30(5):401–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelfand MJ , Raver JL , Nishii L , Leslie LM , Lun J , Lim BC , Duan L , et al. (2011) Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science 332(6033):1100–1104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grout PA , Mitraille S , Sonderegger S (2015) The costs and benefits of coordinating with a different group. J. Econom. Theory 160:517–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guiso L , Sapienza P , Zingales L (2015) Corporate culture, societal culture, and institutions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):336–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartig B , Irlenbusch B , Kölle F (2015) Conditioning on what? Heterogeneous contributions and conditional cooperation. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 55:48–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henrich J , Heine SJ , Norenzayan A (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33(2–3):61–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henrich J , Boyd R , Bowles S , Camerer C , Fehr E , Gintis H , McElreath R (2001) In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):73–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huck S , Kübler D , Weibull J (2012) Social norms and economic incentives in firms. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(2):173–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar S , Westwood SJ (2015) Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59(3):690–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar S , Lelkes Y , Levendusky M , Malhotra N , Westwood SJ (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the united states. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22:129–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobson RP , Marchiondo LA , Jacobson KJ , Hood JN (2020) The synergistic effect of descriptive and injunctive norm perceptions on counterproductive work behaviors. J. Bus. Ethics 162:191–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kandel E , Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. 100(4):801–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr NL , Rumble AC , Park ES , Ouwerkerk JW , Parks CD , Gallucci M , Van Lange PA (2009) “How many bad apples does it take to spoil the whole barrel?”: Social exclusion and toleration for bad apples. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):603–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimbrough EO , Vostroknutov A (2016) Norms make preferences social. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 14(3):608–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimbrough EO , Krupka EL , Kumar R , Murray JM , Ramalingam A , Sánchez-Franco S , Sarmiento OL , et al. (2024) On the stability of norms and norm-following propensity: A cross-cultural panel study with adolescents. Experiment. Econom. 1–28.Google Scholar
  • Kölle F , Quercia S (2021) The influence of empirical and normative expectations on cooperation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 190:691–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krupka E , Weber RA (2009) The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior. J. Econom. Psych. 30(3):307–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krupka EL , Weber RA (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):495–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ledyard JO (1995) Public goods: A survey of experimental research. Roth A , Kagel J , eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 111–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machina M , Pratt J (1997) Increasing risk: Some direct constructions. J. Risk Uncertainty 14(2):103–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michaeli M , Spiro D (2015) Norm conformity across societies. J. Public Econom. 132:51–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michaeli M , Spiro D (2017) From peer pressure to biased norms. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 9(1):152–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunn N (2022) On the dynamics of human behavior: The past, present, and future of culture, conflict, and cooperation. AEA Paper Proc. 112:15–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Panizza F , Dimant E , Kimbrough EO , Vostroknutov A (2023) Measuring norm pluralism and tolerance. Preprint, submitted December 8, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4649792.Google Scholar
  • Pek S , Turner N , Tucker S , Kelloway EK , Morrish J (2017) Injunctive safety norms, young worker risk-taking behaviors, and workplace injuries. Accident Anal. Prevention 106:202–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qualtrics (2005) Qualtrics software, version [January 2021] of Qualtrics. https://www.qualtrics.com.Google Scholar
  • Quentin A (2016) distBuilder v 1.1.0 (1.1.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.166736.Google Scholar
  • Ren ZB , Dimant E , Schweitzer M (2023) Beyond belief: How social engagement motives influence the spread of conspiracy theories. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 104:104421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robbett A , Matthews PH (2023) Polarization and group cooperation. Quart. J. Political Sci. 18(2):215–241.Google Scholar
  • Robertson JL , Barling J (2013) Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 34(2):176–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross SM , Kelly JJ , Sullivan RJ , Perry WJ , Mercer D , Davis RM , Washburn TD , et al. (1996) Stochastic Processes , vol. 2 (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Schultz WP , Khazian AM , Zaleski AC (2008) Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Soc. Influence 3(1):4–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shang J , Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econom. J. (London) 119(540):1422–1439.Google Scholar
  • Sliwka D (2007) Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):999–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephan U , Uhlaner LM (2010) Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41:1347–1364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor SG , Locklear LR , Kluemper DH , Lu X (2022) Beyond targets and instigators: Examining workplace incivility in dyads and the moderating role of perceived incivility norms. J. Appl. Psych. 107(8):1288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thöni C , Volk S (2018) Conditional cooperation: Review and refinement. Econom. Lett. 171:37–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tobin J (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26(1):24–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venema T , van Gestel L (2021) Nudging in the workplace: Facilitating desirable behaviour by changing the environment. A Handbook of Theories on Designing Alignment Between People and the Office Environment (Routledge, London, UK), 222–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vigoda-Gadot E (2007) Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees’ performance: An empirical examination of two competing models. Personality Rev. 36(5):661–683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber RA , Camerer CF (2003) Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. 49(4):400–415.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wolff I (2017) What are the equilibria in public-good experiments? Econom. Lett. 150:83–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xie JL , Johns G (2000) Interactive effects of absence culture salience and group cohesiveness: A multi-level and cross-level analysis of work absenteeism in the Chinese context. J. Occupation Organ. Psych. 73(1):31–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young HP (2015) The evolution of social norms. Annu. Rev. Econom. 7(1):359–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zizzo DJ (2010) Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 13(1):75–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.