Cut to the Curve: Underrecognition and Talent Loss from Forced Ranking in a Multinational Firm

References

• Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 2(1965):267–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ammann M, Horsch P, Oesch D (2016) Competing with superstars. Management Sci. 62(10):2842–2858.Link, Google Scholar
• Bannister BD, Balkin DB (1990) Performance evaluation and compensation feedback messages: An integrated model. J. Occupational Psych. 63(2):97–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2008) Status incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):206–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Best J (2011) Everyone’s a Winner: Life in Our Congratulatory Culture (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bol JC (2011) The determinants and performance effects of managers’ performance evaluation biases. Accounting Rev. 86(5):1549–1575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond B, Poskanzer E (2024) Striking out swinging: Specialist success following forced task inferiority. Organ. Sci. 35(2):698–718.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowles S, Polania-Reyes S (2012) Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements? J. Econom. Literature 50(2):368–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2016) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3085–3099.Link, Google Scholar
• Bretz RD Jr, Milkovich GT, Read W (1992) The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. J. Management 18(2):321–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breza E, Kaur S, Shamdasani Y (2018) The morale effects of pay inequality. Quart. J. Econom. 133(2):611–663.Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Heuer L, Magner N, Folger R, Umphress E, van den Bos K, Siegel P (2003) High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91(1):51–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1982) Toward a Structural Theory of Action (Academic Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Conyon MJ (2018) What do performance appraisals do? ILR Rev. 71(1):88–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Mas A, Moretti E, Saez E (2012) Inequality at work: The effect of peer salarieson job satisfaction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2981–3003.Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2015) Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organ. Sci. 26(2):311–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Chambers CR (2024) Nonmonetary reward systems, counterproductive behavior, and responses to sanctions in open collaboration environments. Organ. Sci. 35(3):928–947.Link, Google Scholar
• Chambers CR, Baker WE (2020) Robust systems of cooperation in the presence of rankings: How displaying prosocial contributions can offset the disruptive effects of performance rankings. Organ. Sci. 31(2):287–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohan P (2012) Why stack ranking worked better at GE than Microsoft. Forbes (June 24), https://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2012/07/13/why-stack-ranking-worked-better-at-ge-than-microsoft/.Google Scholar
• Cohen‐Charash Y (2009) Episodic envy. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 39(9):2128–2173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen-Charash Y, Mueller JS (2007) Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 92(3):666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life‐tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 34(2):187–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diekmann KA, Samuels SM, Ross L, Bazerman MH (1997) Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: Allocators versus recipients. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(5):1061–1074. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dineen BR, Duffy MK, Henle CA, Lee K (2017) Green by comparison: Deviant and normative transmutations of job search envy in a temporal context. Acad. Management J. 60(1):295–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dollard J, Doob LW, Miller NE, Mowrer OH, Seare RR (1939) Frustration and Aggression (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dube A, Giuliano L, Leonard J (2019) Fairness and frictions: The impact of unequal raises on quit behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(2):620–663. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy MK, Lee K, Adair EA (2021) Workplace envy. Ann. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 8(1):19–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy MK, Shaw JD, Schaubroeck JM (2008) Envy in organizational life. Smith RH, ed. Envy: Theory and Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 167–189.Google Scholar
• Eissa G, Wyland R (2016) Keeping up with the Joneses: The role of envy, relationship conflict, and job performance in social undermining. J Leadership Organ. Stud. 23(1):55–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elster J (1985) Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Standford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Gallus J (2017) Honours versus Money: The Economics of Awards (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Jegen R (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Neckermann S (2008) Awards: A view from psychological economics. Zeitschrift Psych. 216(4):198–208.Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3):213–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goode WJ (1978) The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Social Control System (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1990) Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psych. 75(5):561–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grote RC (2005) Forced Ranking: Making Performance Management Work (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee LE, Nanda A (2008) Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Sci. 54(7):1213–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Gurr T (1970) Why Men Rebel (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Handley L (2023) Should a company rate its staff? Accessed August 14, 2024, https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/05/stack-ranking-ex-amazon-exec-explains-the-performance-review-system.html.Google Scholar
• Hirsch F (1976) Social Limits to Growth (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1982) Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(1):169–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1961) Social Behavior Its Elementary Forms (Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York).Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S (2008) Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data, vol. 618 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Impraise.com (2016) Microsoft throws stack ranking out the window. https://blog.impraise.com/360-feedback/microsoft-throws-stack-ranking-out-the-window.Google Scholar
• Khan AK, Quratulain S, M. Bell C (2014) Episodic envy and counterproductive work behaviors: Is more justice always good? J. Organ. Behav. 35(1):128–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landau SB, Leventhal GS (1976) A simulation study of administrators’ behavior toward employees who receive job offers 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 6(4):291–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin I (2011) Paying $30,000 for a gold star: An empirical investigation into the value of peer recognition to software salespeople. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Lawler EE (1971) Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Lawler EE (2002) The folly of forced ranking. Strategy and Business (July 15), https://www.strategy-business.com/article/20290.Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee K, Duffy MK (2019) A functional model of workplace envy and job performance: When do employees capitalize on envy by learning from envied targets? Acad Management J. 62(4):1085–1110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leventhal GS (1976) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. Berkowitz L, Walster E, eds. Equity Theory: Toward a General Theory of Social Interactions (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Leventhal GS (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (Springer, New York), 27–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leventhal GS (1988) A survey of agency models of organization. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 9:153–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leventhal GS, Karuza J, Fry WR (1980) Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. Mikula G, ed. Justice and Social Interaction (Springer-Verlag, New York), 167–218.Google Scholar
• Lind EA, Tyler TR (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (Springer Science & Business Media).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn FB, Podolny JM, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de) construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS (2000) Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad. Management J. 43(4):738–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGraw PA, Mellers BA, Tetlock PE (2005) Expectations and emotions of Olympic athletes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 41(4):438–446. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medvec VH, Madey SF, Gilovich T (1995) When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(4):603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller NE, Bugelski R (1948) Minor studies of aggression: II. The influence of frustrations imposed by the in-group on attitudes expressed toward out-groups. J. Psych. 25(2):437–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS, Stearns LB, Fleischer A (2011) Getting a bonus: Social networks, performance, and reward among commercial bankers. Organ. Sci. 22(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A, Shi X (2007) Contests for status. J. Political Econom. 115(2):338–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon SH, Scullen SE, Latham GP (2016) Precarious curve ahead: The effects of forced distribution rating systems on job performance. Human Resource Management Rev. 26(2):166–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Boyle E Jr, Aguinis H (2012) The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Personnel Psych. 65(1):79–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2006) Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-Based Management (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Restivo M, Van De Rijt A (2012) Experimental study of informal rewards in peer production. PLoS One 7(3):e34358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross L, Ward A (1996) Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. Values Knowledge 103:135.Google Scholar
• Rynes SL, Gerhart B, Parks L (2005) Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Ann. Rev. Psych. 56:571–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schleicher DJ, Bull RA, Green SG (2009) Rater reactions to forced distribution rating systems. J. Management 35(4):899–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz H (2024) Starbucks (with Howard Schultz), Acquired podcast, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/starbucks-with-howard-schultz/id1050462261?i=1000657758174.Google Scholar
• Siegel J (2008) Global Talent Management at Novartis (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Folger R (1997) Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psych. 82(3):434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith RH, Kim SH (2007) Comprehending envy. Psych. Bull. 133(1):46–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE (1974) Alternative theories of wage determination and unemployment in LDC’s: The labor turnover model. Quart. J. Econom. 88(2):194–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stouffer SA, Suchman EA, Devinney LC, Star SA, Williams RM Jr (1949) The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life, Studies in Social Psychology in World War II (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum F (1925) The professional criminal: An inquiry into the making of criminals. The Balance of Power in Society and Other Essays (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Thibaut JW, Kelley HH (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Thibaut JW, Walker L (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Thiel CE, Bonner J, Bush JT, Welsh DT, Pati R (2021) Rationalize or reappraise? How envy and cognitive reappraisal shape unethical contagion. Personnel Psych. 74(2):237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch J (2001) Jack: Straight From the Gut (John F. Welch, Jr. Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Welch J, Welch S (2005) Winning (Harper Business Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Wills TA (1981) Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psych. Bull. 90(2):245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younge KA, Marx M (2016) The value of employee retention: Evidence from a natural experiment. J. Econom. Management Strategy 25(3):652–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu L, Duffy MK, Tepper BJ (2018) Consequences of downward envy: A model of self-esteem threat, abusive supervision, and supervisory leader self-improvement. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2296–2318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zizzo DJ, Oswald AJ (2001) Are people willing to pay to reduce others’ incomes? Ann. Econom. Statist. 63(2):39–65.Google Scholar