Do Physicians Improve More from Positive or Negative Feedback?

References

• Abraham J, Feldman R, Carlin C (2004) Understanding employee awareness of healthcare quality information: How can employers benefit? Health Services Res. 39(6p1):1799–1816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• AHRQ (2017) About the national quality strategy. Accessed October 15, 2022, https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/about/index.html.Google Scholar
• Anderson G, Hussey PS (2001) Comparing health system performance in OECD countries. Health Affairs 20(3):219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SW, Kimball A (2019) Evidence for the feedback role of performance measurement systems. Management Sci. 65(9):4385–4406.Link, Google Scholar
• Andrabi T, Das J, Khwaja AI (2017) Report cards: The impact of providing school and child test scores on educational markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(6):1535–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Locke EA (2003) Benefiting from negative feedback. Human Resource Management Rev. 13(4):631–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Awaysheh A, Bonet R, Ortega J (2023) Performance feedback and productivity: Evidence from a field experiment. Production Oper. Management 32(1):98–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Iriberri N (2010) The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. J. Public Econom. 94(7–8):435–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey R (2014) The problem with praise. Accessed October 15, 2022, https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/smart-moves/201411/the-problem-praise.Google Scholar
• Balcazar F, Hopkins BL, Suarez Y (1985) A critical, objective review of performance feedback. J. Organ. Behav. Management 7(3–4):65–89.Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger L, Klassen KJ, Libby T, Webb A (2013) Complacency and giving up across repeated tournaments: Evidence from the field. J. Management Accounting Res. 25(1):143–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berner ES, Graber ML (2008) Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Amer. J. Medicine 121(5):S2–S23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Derr WR, Laing WN (1987) Self-esteem and reactions to negative feedback: Toward greater generalizability. J. Res. Personality 21(3):318–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JD (2010) High self-esteem buffers negative feedback: Once more with feeling. Cognition Emotion 24(8):1389–1404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryan CJ, Tipton E, Yeager DS (2021) Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nature Human Behav. 5(8):980–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke J, Towry KL, Young D, Zureich J (2023) Ambiguous sticks and carrots: The effect of contract framing and payoff ambiguity on employee effort. Accounting Rev. 98(1):139–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PHC (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calonico S, Cattaneo MD, Farrell MH, Titiunik R (2017) rdrobust: Software for regression-discontinuity designs. Stata J. 17(2):372–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon MD, Edmondson AC (2005) Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning 38(3):299–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF (2001) On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce P, Martinez-Jerez FA (2009) Relative performance compensation, contests, and dynamic incentives. Management Sci. 55(8):1306–1320.Link, Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce P, Lourenco SM, Martinez-Jerez F (2017) The performance effect of feedback frequency and detail: Evidence from a field experiment in customer satisfaction. J. Accounting Res. 55(5):1051–1088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chab’e-Ferret S (2015) Analysis of the bias of matching and difference-in-difference under alternative earnings and selection processes. J. Econometrics 185(1):110–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambon V, Thero H, Vidal M, Vandendriessche H, Haggard P, Palminteri S (2020) Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined vs. imposed choices. Nature Human Behav. 4(10):1067–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y-C, Hung M, Wang Y (2018) The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. J. Accounting Econom. 65(1):169–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou SY, Deily ME, Li S, Lu Y (2014) Competition and the impact of online hospital report cards. J. Health Econom. 34:42–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen HB, Floyd E, Liu LY, Maffett M (2017) The real effects of mandated information on social responsibility in financial reports: Evidence from mine-safety records. J. Accounting Econom. 64(2–3):284–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen-Szalanski JJ, Bushyhead JB (1981) Physicians’ use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 7(4):928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christian B, Griffiths T (2016) Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Christianson JB, Volmar KM, Alexander J, Scanlon DP (2010) A report card on provider report cards: Current status of the healthcare transparency movement. J. General Internal Medicine 25(11):1235–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christianson J, Maeng D, Abraham J, Scanlon DP, Alexander J, Mittler J, Finch M (2014) What influences the awareness of physician quality information? Implications for Medicare. Medicare Medicaid Res. Rev. 4(2):E1–E15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemens J, Gottlieb JD (2014) Do physicians’ financial incentives affect medical treatment and patient health? Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1320–1349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clement JP, Bazzoli GJ, Zhao M (2012) Nursing home price and quality responses to publicly reported quality information. Health Services Res. 47(1pt1):86–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compte O, Postlewaite A (2004) Confidence-enhanced performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1536–1557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coutts A (2019) Good news and bad news are still news: Experimental evidence on belief updating. Experiment. Econom. 22(2):369–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croskerry P (2003) The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad. Medicine 78(8):775–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham S (2021) Causal Inference: The Mixtape (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. 125(6):627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorfman HM, Bhui R, Hughes BL, Gershman SJ (2019) Causal inference about good and bad outcomes. Psych. Sci. 30(4):516–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunt D, Prang K-H, Sabanovic H, Kelaher M (2018) The impact of public performance reporting on market share, mortality, and patient mix outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafts and percutaneous coronary interventions (2000–2016): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Care 56(11):956.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dziuban SW Jr, McIlduff JB, Miller SJ, Dal Col RH (1994) How a New York cardiac surgery program uses outcomes data. Annals Thoracic Surgery 58(6):1871–1876.Google Scholar
• Eddy DM (1982) Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 249–267.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2011) Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(4):48–55.Google Scholar
• Eil D, Rao JM (2011) The good news-bad news effect: Asymmetric processing of objective information about yourself. Amer. Econom. J. 3(2):114–138.Google Scholar
• Elder J, Davis T, Hughes BL (2022) Learning about the self: Motives for coherence and positivity constrain learning from self-relevant social feedback. Psych. Sci. 33(4):629–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Medical Care 36(1):8–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elstein AS, Shulman LS, Sprafka SA (1981) Medical problem-solving. Acad. Medicine 56(1):75–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelberg S, Pierce O (2015) Our rebuttal to rand’s critique of surgeon scorecard. Accessed October 15, 2022, https://www.propublica.org/article/our-rebuttal-to-rands-critique-of-surgeon-scorecard.Google Scholar
• Epstein AJ (2010) Effects of report cards on referral patterns to cardiac surgeons. J. Health Econom. 29(5):718–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erickson D, Holderness DK Jr, Olsen KJ, Thornock TA (2022) Feedback with feeling? How emotional language in feedback affects individual performance. Accounting Organ. Soc. 99:101329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eskreis-Winkler L, Fishbach A (2019) Not learning from failure—The greatest failure of all. Psych Sci. 30(12):1733–1744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans MF (2016) The clean air act watch list: An enforcement and compliance natural experiment. J. Assoc. Environment. Resources Econom. 3(3):627–665.Google Scholar
• Eyal P, David R, Andrew G, Zak E, Ekaterina D (2021) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behav. Res. Methods, 1–20.Google Scholar
• Eyring H (2020) Disclosing physician ratings: Performance effects and the difficulty of altering ratings consensus. J. Accounting Res. 58(4):1023–1067.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eyring H, Ferguson PJ, Koppers S (2021) Less information, more comparison, and better performance: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Accounting Res. 59(2):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein SR, Fishbach A (2012) Tell me what I did wrong: Experts seek and respond to negative feedback. J. Consumer Res. 39(1):22–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbach A, Eyal T, Finkelstein SR (2010) How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 4(8):517–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL (2003) The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: The content, quality, and accessibility of care. Annals Internal Medicine 138(4):273–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong CJ, Patall EA, Vasquez AC, Stautberg S (2019) A meta-analysis of negative feedback on intrinsic motivation. Ed. Psych. Rev. 31:121–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank RG, Zeckhauser RJ (2007) Custom-made versus ready-to-wear treatments: Behavioral propensities in physicians’ choices. J. Health Econom. 26(6):1101–1127.Google Scholar
• Frederickson JR (1992) Relative performance information: The effects of common uncertainty and contract type on agent effort. Accounting Rev. 67(4):647–669.Google Scholar
• Friedberg MW, Bilimoria KY, Pronovost PJ, Shahian DM, Damberg CL, Zaslavsky AM (2016) Response to Propublica’s rebuttal of our critique of the surgeon scorecard. Rand Health Quart. 6(1):4.Google Scholar
• Friesen J, Javdani M, Smith J, Woodcock S (2012) How do school ‘report cards’ affect school choice decisions? Canadian J. Econom. 45(2):784–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG (2008) Systematic review: The evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Annals Internal Medicine 148(2):111–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallani S, Kajiwara T, Krishnan R (2020) Value of new performance information in healthcare: Evidence from Japan. Internat. J. Health Econom. Management 20(4):319–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia SM, Tor A, Schiff TM (2013) The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspective Psych. Sci. 8(6):634–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S (2007) Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 8(2):53–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T (1983) Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 44(6):1110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gnepp J, Klayman J, Williamson IO, Barlas S (2020) The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback. PLoS One 15(6):e0234444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith J, Kaufman N, Burns L (2016) The tangled hospital-physician relationship. Accessed June 26, 2022, https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/tangled-hospital-physician-relationship.Google Scholar
• Gonzalez GC, Hoffman VB, Moser DV (2020) Do effort differences between bonus and penalty contracts persist in labor markets? Accounting Rev. 95(3):205–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabowski DC, Town RJ (2011) Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards. Health Services Res. 46(6pt1):1698–1719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman Z, Owens D (2012) An unlucky feeling: Overconfidence and noisy feedback. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84(2):510–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackbarth G, Reischauer R, Mutti A (2008) Collective accountability for medical care—Toward bundled Medicare payments. New England J. Medicine 359(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan LR, Krishnan R, Newman AH (2008) The effects of disseminating relative performance feedback in tournament and individual performance compensation plans. Accounting Rev. 83(4):893–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz JM (1979) The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(8):1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hattie J, Timperley H (2007) The power of feedback. Rev. Ed. Res. 77(1):81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermes H, Huschens M, Rothlauf F, Schunk D (2021) Motivating low-achievers—Relative performance feedback in primary schools. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 187:45–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirth RA, Banaszak-Holl JC, Fries BE, Turenne MN (2003) Does quality influence consumer choice of nursing homes? Evidence from nursing home to nursing home transfers. INQUIRY 40(4):343–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofer TP, Hayward RA, Greenfield S, Wagner EH, Kaplan SH, Manning WG (1999) The unreliability of individual physician report cards for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease. JAMA 281(22):2098–2105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, Gibbs BJ, McKenzie CR, Marquis MA (1991) Learning from feedback: Exactingness and incentives. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 17(4):734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilies R, De Pater IE, Judge T (2007) Differential affective reactions to negative and positive feedback, and the role of self-esteem. J. Management Psych. 22(6):590–609.Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Lemieux T (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. J. Econometrics 142(2):615–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson M, Earle CC, Price M, Newhouse JP (2010) How Medicare’s payment cuts for cancer chemotherapy drugs changed patterns of treatment. Health Affairs 29(7):1391–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe TA, Hasday SJ, Dimick JB (2016) Power outage—Inadequate surgeon performance measures leave patients in the dark. JAMA Surgery 151(7):599–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jauhar S (2015) Opinion—Giving doctors grades. Accessed October 15, 2022, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/22/opinion/giving-doctors-grades.html.Google Scholar
• Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. New England J. Medicine 360(14):1418–1428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Leslie P (2003) The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Quart. J. Econom. 118(2):409–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Leslie P (2009) Reputational incentives for restaurant hygiene. Amer. Econom. J. 1(1):237–267.Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Sorensen AT (2006) Information and consumer choice: The value of publicized health plan ratings. J. Health Econom. 25(2):248–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung K, Feldman R, Scanlon D (2011) Where would you go for your next hospitalization? J. Health Econom. 30(4):832–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (2013) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I (World Scientific, Singapore), 99–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus. Rev. (January–February):37–48.Google Scholar
• Kc D, Staats BR, Gino F (2013) Learning from my success and from others’ failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 59(11):2435–2449.Link, Google Scholar
• Khullar D, Dave A Chokshi RK, Reddy A, Basu K, Conway PH, Rajkumar R (2015) Behavioral economics and physician compensation—Promise and challenges. New England J. Medicine 372(24):2281–2283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klinger E, Barta SG, Maxeiner ME (1980) Motivational correlates of thought content frequency and commitment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(6):1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psych Bull. 119(2):254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolstad JT (2013) Information and quality when motivation is intrinsic: Evidence from surgeon report cards. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2875–2910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lefebvre G, Lebreton M, Meyniel F, Bourgeois-Gironde S, Palminteri S (2017) Behavioural and neural characterization of optimistic reinforcement learning. Nature Human Behav. 1(4):1–9.Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Wysocki PD (2016) The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. J. Accounting Res. 54(2):525–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA, Syverson C (2013) Toward an understanding of learning by doing: Evidence from an automobile assembly plant. J. Political Econom. 121(4):643–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy PE, Williams JR (2004) The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. J. Management 30(6):881–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao JM, Fleisher LA, Navathe AS (2016) Increasing the value of social comparisons of physician performance using norms. JAMA 316(11):1151–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Molnar A (2018) The renaissance of belief-based utility in economics. Nature Human Behav. 2(3):166–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loftus S, Tanlu LJ (2018) Because of “because”: Examining the use of causal language in relative performance feedback. Accounting Rev. 93(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lourenço SM (2016) Monetary incentives, feedback, and recognition—Complements or substitutes? Evidence from a field experiment in a retail services company. Accounting Rev. 91(1):279–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacLean CH, Kerr EA, Qaseem A (2018) Time out—Charting a path for improving performance measurement. New England J. Medicine 378(19):1757–1761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manthei K, Sliwka D, Vogelsang T (2022) Information, incentives, and attention: A field experiment on the interaction of management controls. Accounting Rev. 98(5):455–479.Google Scholar
• McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC, Tversky A (1982) On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England J. Medicine 306(21):1259–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meeker D, Linder JA, Fox CR, Friedberg MW, Persell SD, Goldstein NJ, Knight TK, et al. (2016) Effect of behavioral interventions on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing among primary care practices: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315(6):562–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller S, Johnson N, Wherry LR (2021) Medicaid and mortality: New evidence from linked survey and administrative data. Quart. J. Econom. 136(3):1783–1829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon K (2021) The real reason why it’s harder than ever to get into medical school—And what aspiring physicians can do to improve their chances. Accessed October 15, 2022, https://www.forbes.com/sites/kristenmoon/2021/06/17/the-real-reason-why-its-harder-than-ever-to-get-into-medical-school-and-what-aspiring-physi.Google Scholar
• Moore BJ, White S, Washington R, Coenen N, Elixhauser A (2017) Identifying increased risk of readmission and in-hospital mortality using hospital administrative data. Medical Care 55(7):698–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukamel DB, Weimer DL, Spector WD, Ladd H, Zinn JS (2008) Publication of quality report cards and trends in reported quality measures in nursing homes. Health Services Res. 43(4):1244–1262.Google Scholar
• Mullahy J, Norton EC (2022) Why transform y? A critical assessment of dependent-variable transformations in regression models for skewed and sometimes-zero outcomes. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Murphy B (2018) Residency Match: The 7 Most Competitive Medical Specialties (American Medical Association, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Nease AA, Mudgett BO, Quinones MA (1999) Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback. J. Appl. Psych. 84(5):806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Prang K-H, Maritz R, Sabanovic H, Dunt D, Kelaher M (2021) Mechanisms and impact of public reporting on physicians and hospitals’ performance: A systematic review (2000–2020). PLoS One 16(2):e0247297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Redelmeier DA, Shafir E (1995) Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. JAMA 273(4):302–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Redelmeier DA, Tversky A (1990) Discrepancy between medical decisions for individual patients and for groups. Shafir E, ed. A Bradford Book (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum L (2015) Scoring no goal—Further adventures in transparency. New England J. Medicine 373(15):1385–1388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruzzene M, Noller P (1986) Feedback motivation and reactions to personality interpretations that differ in favorability and accuracy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samet J, Schuhmacher K, Towry KL, Zureich J (2023) Reciprocity over time: Do employees respond more to kind or unkind controls? Preprint, submitted March 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4371449.Google Scholar
• Scanlon DP, Shi Y, Bhandari N, Christianson JB (2015) Are healthcare quality ‘report cards’ reaching consumers? Awareness in the chronically ill population. Amer. J. Management Care 21(3):236–244.Google Scholar
• Schneider EC, Epstein AM (1998) Use of public performance reports: A survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. JAMA 279(20):1638–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott KW, Orav EJ, Cutler DM, Jha AK (2017) Changes in hospital–physician affiliations in us hospitals and their effect on quality of care. Ann. Internal Medicine 166(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Scanlon DP, Bhandari N, Christianson JB (2017) Is anyone paying attention to physician report cards? The impact of increased availability on consumers’ awareness and use of physician quality information. Health Services Res. 52(4):1570–1589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinaiko AD, Eastman D, Rosenthal MB (2012) How report cards on physicians, physician groups, and hospitals can have greater impact on consumer choices. Health Affairs 31(3):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slaughter MJ (2001) Trade liberalization and per capita income convergence: A difference-in-differences analysis. J. Internat. Econom. 55(1):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun L, Abraham S (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J. Econometrics 225(2):175–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swift V, Peterson JB (2018) Improving the effectiveness of performance feedback by considering personality traits and task demands. PLoS One 13(5):e0197810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Syed M (2015) Black Box Thinking: Why Most People Never Learn from Their Mistakes: But Some Do (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
• Tafkov ID (2012) Private and public relative performance information under different compensation contracts. Accounting Rev. 88(1):327–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tikkanen R, Abrams MK (2020) US Healthcare from a Global Perspective, 2019: Higher Spending, Worse Outcomes (The Commonwealth Fund, New York).Google Scholar
• Uhrig JD, Short PF (2002) Testing the effect of quality reports on the health plan choices of medicare beneficiaries. INQUIRY 39(4):355–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van-Dijk D, Kluger AN (2004) Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus? Appl. Psych. 53(1):113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VanLare JM, Blum JD, Conway PH (2012) Linking performance with payment: Implementing the physician value-based payment modifier. JAMA 308(20):2089–2090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiner B (1985) “Spontaneous” causal thinking. Psych. Bull. 97(1):74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wennberg JE (2004) Practice variations and healthcare reform: Connecting the dots: A focus on medical error is preventing sufficient focus on improving the quality of patient decision making to reduce practice variations (and costs) in today’s healthcare system. Health Affairs 23(Suppl 2):VAR–140–VAR–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zimmermann F (2020) The dynamics of motivated beliefs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(2):337–361.Crossref, Google Scholar