Bank Specialization and Zombie Lending

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01437

References

  • Acharya V, Hasan I, Saunders A (2006) Should banks be diversified? Evidence from individual bank loan portfolios. J. Bus. 79(3):1355–1412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acharya V, Sreedhar B, Srinivasan A (2007) Does industry-wide distress affect defaulted firms? Evidence from creditor recoveries. J. Financial Econom. 85(3):787–821.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acharya V, Crosignani M, Eisert T, Eufinger C (2024) Zombie credit and (dis-)inflation: Evidence from Europe. J. Finance. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acharya V, Eisert T, Eufinger C, Hirsch CW (2019) Whatever it takes: The real effects of unconventional monetary policy. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(9):3366–3411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albertazzi U, Marchetti DJ (2010) Credit supply, flight to quality and evergreening: An analysis of bank-firm relationships after Lehman. Working paper, Bank of Italy, Rome.Google Scholar
  • Almeida H, Campello M, Hackbarth D (2011) Liquidity mergers. J. Financial Econom. 102(3):526–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Altavilla C, Boucinha M, Peydró JL, Smets F (2020) Banking supervision, monetary policy and risk-taking: Big data evidence from 15 credit registers. Working paper, European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Andrews D, Petroulakis F (2017) Breaking the shackles: Zombie firms, weak banks and depressed restructuring in Europe. Working paper, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  • Bai J, Carvalho D, Phillips G (2018) The impact of bank credit on labor reallocation and aggregate industry productivity. J. Finance 73(6):2787–2836.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee R, Hofmann B (2022) Corporate zombies: Life cycle and anatomy. Econom. Policy 37(112):757–803.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck T, De Jonghe O, Mulier K (2022) Bank sectoral concentration and risk: Evidence from a worldwide sample of banks. J. Money Credit Bank. 54(6):1705–1739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker B, Ivashina V (2022) Weak corporate insolvency rules: The missing driver of zombie lending. AEA Papers Proc. 112(May):516–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benmelech E, Bergman NK (2011) Bankruptcy and the collateral channel. J. Finance 66(2):337–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger PG, Minnis M, Sutherland A (2017) Commercial lending concentration and bank expertise: Evidence from borrower financial statements. J. Accounting Econom. 64(2):253–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berthou A, Mayer T, Mésonnier JS (2021) Good connections: Bank specialization and the tariff elasticity of exports. Working paper, CEPR, London.Google Scholar
  • Blattner L, Farinha L, Rebelo F (2023) When losses turn into loans: The cost of weak banks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 113(6):1600–1641.Google Scholar
  • Blickle KS, Parlatore C, Saunders A (2021) Specialization in banking. Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York.Google Scholar
  • Bolton P, Freixas X, Gambacorta L, Mistrulli PE (2016) Relationship and transaction lending in a crisis. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(10):2643–2676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonfim D, Cerqueiro G, Ongena S, Degryse H (2023) On-site inspecting zombie lending. Management Sci. 69(5):2547–2567.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bruche M, Llobet G (2014) Preventing zombie lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(3):923–956.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caballero RJ, Hoshi T, Kashyap AK (2008) Zombie lending and depressed restructuring in Japan. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):1943–1977.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caggese A, Guler O, Mariathasan M, Mulier K (2022) Firing costs and productivity: Evidence from a natural experiment. Working paper, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  • De Jonghe O, Dewachter H, Mulier K, Ongena S, Schepens G (2020) Some borrowers are more equal than others: Bank funding shocks and credit reallocation. Rev. Finance 24(1):1–43.Google Scholar
  • De Marco F, Sauvagnat J, Sette E (2021) Lending to overconfident borrowers. Working paper, CEPR, London.Google Scholar
  • Degryse H, Kokas S, Minetti R (2021) Banking on experience. Working paper, CEPR, London.Google Scholar
  • Degryse H, De Jonghe O, Jakovljević S, Mulier K, Schepens G (2019) Identifying credit supply shocks with bank-firm data: Methods and applications. J. Financial Intermediation 40:100813.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dell’Ariccia G, Friedman E, Marquez R (1999) Adverse selection as a barrier to entry in the banking industry. RAND J. Econom. 30(3):515–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond DW (1984) Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Rev. Econom. Stud. 51(3):393–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faria-e-Castro M, Paul P, Sanchéz JM (2024) Evergreening. J. Financial Econom. 153:103778.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Favara G, Minoiu C, Perez-Orive A (2021) Zombie lending to U.S. firms. Working paper, FEDS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Fraisse H, Hombert J, Lé M (2018) The competitive effect of a bank megamerger on credit supply. J. Bank. Finance 93:151–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giannetti M, Saidi F (2019) Shock propagation and banking structure. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(7):2499–2540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giannetti M, Simonov A (2013) On the real effects of bank bailouts: Micro evidence from Japan. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 5(1):135–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giometti M, Guler O, Pietrosanti S (2023) Bank specialization, control rights and real effects. FDIC Center for Financial Research Working Paper No. 2022-14, FDIC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Gopal M (2021) How collateral affects small business lending: The role of lender specialization. CES Working Paper No. CES-21-22, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Gouveia AF, Osterhold C (2018) Fear the walking dead: Zombie firms, spillovers and exit barriers. Working paper, Banco de Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  • Hu Y, Varas F (2021) A theory of zombie lending. J. Finance 76(4):1813–1867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ioannidou V, Ongena S (2010) Time for a change: Loan conditions and bank behavior when firms switch banks. J. Finance 65(5):1847–1877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ivashina V, Laeven L, Moral-Benito E (2022) Loan types and the bank lending channel. J. Monetary Econom. 126:171–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jahn N, Memmel C, Pfingsten A (2016) Banks’ concentration vs. diversification in the loan portfolio: New evidence from Germany. Schmalenbach Bus. Rev. 17(1):25–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khwaja AI, Mian A (2008) Tracing the impact of bank liquidity shocks: Evidence from an emerging market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1413–1442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiyotaki N, Moore J (1997) Credit cycles. J. Political Econom. 105(2):211–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGowan A, Andrews D, Millot V (2018) The walking dead? Zombie firms and productivity performance in OECD countries. Econom. Policy 33(96):685–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Müller I (2020) Trade shocks, credit reallocation and the role of specialisation: Evidence from syndicated lending. Working paper, IWH, Halle, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Müller C, Juelsrud R, Andersen H (2021) Risk-based pricing in competitive lending markets. Working paper, Norges Bank, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  • Paligorova T, Santos JA (2017) Monetary policy and bank risk-taking: Evidence from the corporate loan market. J. Financial Intermediation 30:35–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paravisini D, Rappoport V, Schnabl P (2023) Specialization in bank lending: Evidence from exporting firms. J. Finance 78(4):2049–2085.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Passalacqua A, Angelini P, Lotti F, Soggia G (2020) The real effects of bank supervision: Evidence from on-site bank inspections. Preprint, submitted November 3, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3705558.Google Scholar
  • Petersen MA, Rajan RG (1994) The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. J. Finance 49(1):3–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen MA, Rajan RG (1995) The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Quart. J. Econom. 110(2):407–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodano G, Sette E (2019) Zombie firms in Italy: A critical assessment. Working paper, Bank of Italy, Rome.Google Scholar
  • Schäfer L (2019) Forgive but not forget: The behavior of relationship banks when firms are in distress. Rev. Finance 23(6):1079–1114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schivardi F, Sette E, Tabellini G (2020) Identifying the real effects of zombie lending. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 9:569–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schivardi F, Sette E, Tabellini G (2022) Credit misallocation during the European financial crisis. Econom. J. (London) 132(641):391–423.Google Scholar
  • Schmidt C, Schneider Y, Steffen S, Streitz D (2023) Does zombie lending impair innovation? Preprint, submitted January 30, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3489801.Google Scholar
  • Sharpe S (1990) Asymmetric information, bank lending, and implicit contracts: A stylized model of customer relationships. J. Finance 45(4):1069–1087.Google Scholar
  • Shleifer A, Vishny R (1992) Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach. J. Finance 47(4):1343–1366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Storz M, Koetter M, Setzer R, Westphal A (2017) Do we want these two to tango? On zombie firms and stressed banks in Europe. Working paper, European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.