Phantom of the Opera: ETF Shorting and Shareholder Voting

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01567

References

  • Aggarwal R, Saffi PAC, Sturgess J (2015) The role of institutional investors in voting: Evidence from the securities lending market. J. Finance 70(5):2309–2346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akyol AC, Raff K, Verwijmeren P (2017) The elimination of broker voting in director elections. Finance Res. Lett. 21:34–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apfel RC, Parsons JE, Schwert GW, Stewart GS (2001) Short sales, damages and class certification in 10B-5 actions. NBER Working Paper No. 8618, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Appel IR, Gormley TA, Keim DB (2016) Passive investors, not passive owners. J. Financial Econom. 121(1):111–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bach L, Metzger D (2019) How close are close shareholder votes? Rev. Financial Stud. 32(8):3183–3214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett RW (2009) Elephant in the boardroom: Counting the vote in corporate elections. Valparaiso Univ. Law Rev. 44:125–181.Google Scholar
  • Bebchuk LA, Hirst S (2019) Index funds and the future of corporate governance: Theory, evidence, and policy. Columbia Law Rev. 119:2029–2146.Google Scholar
  • Bebchuk LA, Cohen A, Hirst S (2017) The agency problems of institutional investors. J. Econom. Perspect. 31(3):89–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bethel JE, Gillan SL (2002) The impact of the institutional and regulatory environment on shareholder voting. Financial Management 31(4):29–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharya A, O’Hara M (2018) Can ETFs increase market fragility? Effect of information linkages in ETF markets. Working paper, Baruch College, New York.Google Scholar
  • Bolton P, Li T, Ravina E, Rosenthal H (2020) Investor ideology. J. Financial Econom. 137(2):320–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brav A, Cain MD, Zytnick J (2022) Retail shareholder participation in the proxy process: Monitoring, engagement, and voting. J. Financial Econom. 144(2):492–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brav A, Jiang W, Li T (2021) Picking friends before picking (proxy) fights: How mutual fund voting shapes proxy contests. ECGI Finance Working Paper No. 601/2019, European Corporate Governance Institute, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  • Brooks D (2014) Depository trust company and the omnibus proxy: Shareholder voting in the era of share immobilization. South Texas Law Rev. 56:205–239.Google Scholar
  • Cai J, Garner JL, Walkling RA (2009) Electing directors. J. Finance 64(5):2389–2421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christoffersen S, Geczy C, Musto D, Reed A (2007) Vote trading and information aggregation. J. Finance 62(6):2897–2929.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Comerton-Forde C, Jones C, Putnins T (2016) Shorting at close range: A tale of two types. J. Financial Econom. 121(3):546–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunat V, Gine M, Guadalupe M (2012) The vote is cast: The effect of corporate governance on shareholder value. J. Finance 67(5):1943–1977.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Del Guercio D, Hawkins J (1999) The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. J. Financial Econom. 52(3):293–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donald D (2011) Heart of darkness: The problem at the core of the U.S. proxy system and its solution. Virginia Law Bus. Rev. 6(1):41–100.Google Scholar
  • Evans RB, Moussawi R, Pagano MS, Sedunov J (2024) Operational shorting and ETF liquidity provision. Working paper, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  • Fenn S, Robinson B (2009) Proxy voting by exchange-traded funds: An analysis of ETF voting policies, practices and patterns. Working paper, Proxy Governance and Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute for Corporate Responsibility, New York.Google Scholar
  • Fisch J, Hamdani A, Solomon SD (2019) The new titans of Wall Street: A theoretical framework for passive investors. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 168(1):17–72.Google Scholar
  • Gantchev N, Giannetti M (2021) The costs and benefits of shareholder democracy: Gadflies and low-cost activism. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(12):5629–5675.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glosten L, Biais B, Spatt C (2005) Market microstructure: A survey of microfoundations, empirical results, and policy implications. J. Financial Markets 8(2):217–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gormley T, Gupta V, Matsa D, Mortal S, Yang L (2023) The big three and board gender diversity: The effectiveness of shareholder voice. J. Financial Econom. 149(2):323–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He Y, Kahraman B, Lowry M (2023) ES risks and shareholder voice. Rev. Financial Stud. 36(12):4824–4863.Google Scholar
  • Heath D, Macciocchi D, Michaely R, Ringgenberg MC (2022) Do index funds monitor? Rev. Financial Stud. 25(1):91–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hirst S, Robertson A (2022) Hidden agendas in shareholder voting. Yale J. Regulation 39:1161–1218.Google Scholar
  • Hu HTC, Black B (2006) The new vote buying: Empty voting and hidden (morphable) ownership. Southern California Law Rev. 79:811–908.Google Scholar
  • Hu HTC, Morley JD (2018) A regulatory framework for exchange-traded funds. Southern California Law Rev. 91:839–941.Google Scholar
  • Hu E, Mitts J, Sylvester H (2021) The index-fund dilemma: An empirical study of the lending-voting tradeoff. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Investment Company Institute (2014) Understanding exchange-traded funds: How ETFs work. https://www.ici.org/system/files/attachments/per20-05.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Kahan M, Rock E (2008) The hanging chads of corporate voting. Georgetown Law J. 96(4):1227–1281.Google Scholar
  • Kahan M, Rock EB (2020) Index funds and corporate governance: Let shareholders be shareholders. Boston Univ. Law Rev. 100:1771–1815.Google Scholar
  • Katz J (2006) Barbarians at the ballot box: The use of hedging to acquire low cost corporate influence and its effect on shareholder apathy. Cardozo Law Rev. 28(3):1483–1518.Google Scholar
  • Khemdoudi P, Marhefka E (2017) Cash no longer king to borrow US equities. Securities Finance Quarterly Review (IHS Markit), 18–19. https://cdn.ihs.com/www/blog/commentary/pdf/Securities-Finance-Quarterly-Review.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Lee M (2007) Empty voting: Private solutions to a private problem. Columbia Bus. Law Rev. 2007(3):883–911.Google Scholar
  • Lewellen J, Lewellen K (2022) Institutional investors and corporate governance: The incentive to be engaged. J. Finance 77(1):213–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Listokin Y (2008) Management always wins the close ones. Amer. Law Econom. Rev. 10(2):159–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lund D (2018) The case against passive shareholder voting. J. Corporation Law 43(3):493–536.Google Scholar
  • Martin S, Partnoy F (2005) Encumbered shares. Univ. Illinois Law Rev. 2005(3):775–814.Google Scholar
  • Stoll H (2003) Market microstructure. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz R, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 553–604.Google Scholar
  • Tepe G (2016) Broker-dealer use of “idle” customer assets: Customer protection with sweep programs and securities lending. Columbia Bus. Law Rev. 3:824–877.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2003) Disclosure of proxy voting policies and proxy voting records by registered management investment companies, final rule. https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8188.htm.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2009) SEC release no. 34-60215 for order approving proposed rule change to eliminate broker discretionary voting for election of directors. https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nyse/2009/34-60215.pdf.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2010) Concept release on the U.S. proxy system. https://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/2010/34-62495.pdf.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2018) Roundtable on the proxy process. https://www.sec.gov/files/proxy-round-table-transcript-111518.pdf.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2019) Recommendation from the investor-as-owner subcommittee of the SEC investor advisory committee (IAC) proposal for a proxy plumbing recommendation. https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/investor-advisory-committee-2012/recommendation-investor-as-owner-subcommittee-proxy-plumbing.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Welborn J (2008) The “phantom shares” menace. Regulation 52–61.Google Scholar
  • Yermack D (2010) Shareholder voting and corporate governance. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 2:103–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.