Two-Sided Benefits of Price Transparency in Smallholder Supply Chains

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01617

References

  • Abraham R (2006) Mobile phones and economic development: Evidence from the fishing industry in India. 2006 Internat. Conf. Inform. Comm. Technologies Development (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 48–56.Google Scholar
  • Aker JC (2008) Does digital divide or provide? The impact of cell phones on grain markets in Niger. Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 154, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Aker JC (2010) Information from markets near and far: Mobile phones and agricultural markets in Niger. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):46–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aker JC, Fafchamps M (2015) Mobile phone coverage and producer markets: Evidence from West Africa. World Bank Econom. Rev. 29(2):262–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baye MR, Morgan J (2001) Information gatekeepers on the internet and the competitiveness of homogeneous product markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):454–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Morris S (2019) Information design: A unified perspective. J. Econom. Literature 57(1):44–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borodin V, Bourtembourg J, Hnaien F, Labadie N (2016) Handling uncertainty in agricultural supply chain management: A state of the art. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254(2):348–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burdett K, Judd KL (1983) Equilibrium price dispersion. Econometrica 51(4):955–969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Z, Liu F (2021) Multi-outsourcing supply chain coordination under yield and demand uncertainties. Expert Systems Appl. 181:115177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen YJ, Tang CS (2015) The economic value of market information for farmers in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1441–1452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen YJ, Shanthikumar JG, Shen ZJM (2015) Incentive for peer-to-peer knowledge sharing among farmers in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1430–1440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellison G, Ellison SF (2009) Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the internet. Econometrica 77(2):427–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fafchamps M, Minten B (2012) Impact of SMS-based agricultural information on Indian farmers. World Bank Econom. Rev. 26(3):383–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Futch MD, McIntosh CT (2009) Tracking the introduction of the village phone product in Rwanda. Inform. Technologies Internat. Development 5(3):54.Google Scholar
  • Gokarn S, Kuthambalayan TS (2017) Analysis of challenges inhibiting the reduction of waste in food supply chain. J. Cleaner Production 168:595–604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goyal A (2010) Information, direct access to farmers, and rural market performance in central India. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):22–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green EJ, Porter RH (1984) Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica 52(1):87–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Güler K, Körpeoğlu E, Şen A (2018) Newsvendor competition under asymmetric cost information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 271(2):561–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He QC, Chen YJ, Shen ZJ (2018) On the formation of producers’ information-sharing coalitions. Production Oper. Management 27(5):917–927.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen R (2007) The digital provide: Information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the South Indian fisheries sector. Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):879–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keren B (2009) The single-period inventory problem: Extension to random yield from the perspective of the supply chain. Omega 37(4):801–810.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer P (1995) Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(4):515–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knapp S, van der Heijden MG (2018) A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture. Nature Comm. 9(1):1–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kremer I, Mansour Y, Perry M (2014) Implementing the “wisdom of the crowd”. J. Political Econom. 122(5):988–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levi R, Rajan M, Singhvi S, Zheng Y (2020) The impact of unifying agricultural wholesale markets on prices and farmers’ profitability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(5):2366–2371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liao CN, Chen YJ, Tang CS (2019) Information provision policies for improving farmer welfare in developing countries: Heterogeneous farmers and market selection. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):254–270.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, McCardle KF (1997) The competitive newsboy. Oper. Res. 45(1):54–65.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newman N, Bergquist LF, Immorlica N, Leyton-Brown K, Lucier B, McIntosh C, Quinn J, Ssekibuule R (2018) Designing and evolving an electronic agricultural marketplace in Uganda. Proc. 1st ACM SIGCAS Conf. Comput. Sustainable Societies, 1–11.Google Scholar
  • Palley AB, Soll JB (2019) Extracting the wisdom of crowds when information is shared. Management Sci. 65(5):2291–2309.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Papanastasiou Y, Bimpikis K, Savva N (2018) Crowdsourcing exploration. Management Sci. 64(4):1727–1746.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parker C, Ramdas K, Savva N (2016) Is it enough? Evidence from a natural experiment in India’s agriculture markets. Management Sci. 62(9):2481–2503.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parlar M (1988) Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Naval Res. Logist. (NRL) 35(3):397–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petruzzi NC, Dada M (1999) Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Oper. Res. 47(2):183–194.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rasch A, Herre J (2013) Customer-side transparency, elastic demand, and tacit collusion under differentiation. Inform. Econom. Policy 25(1):51–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ritchie H (2021) Smallholders produce one-third of the world’s food, less than half of what many headlines claim. Our World in Data (August 6), https://ourworldindata.org/smallholder-food-production.Google Scholar
  • Salop S, Stiglitz J (1977) Bargains and ripoffs: A model of monopolistically competitive price dispersion. Rev. Econom. Stud. 44(3):493–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz C (2005) Transparency on the consumer side and tacit collusion. Eur. Econom. Rev. 49(2):279–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz C (2017) Collusion in markets with imperfect price information on both sides. Rev. Indust. Organ. 50(3):287–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sodhi MS, Tang CS (2014) Supply-chain research opportunities with the poor as suppliers or distributors in developing countries. Production Oper. Management 23(9):1483–1494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stahl DO (1989) Oligopolistic pricing with sequential consumer search. Amer. Econom. Rev. :700–712.Google Scholar
  • Stigler GJ (1964) A theory of oligopoly. J. Political Econom. 72(1):44–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Svensson J, Yanagizawa D (2009) Getting prices right: The impact of the market information service in Uganda. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2‒3):435–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsay AA, Agrawal N (2000) Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(4):372–391.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (1980) A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(4):651–659.Google Scholar
  • Xiao S, Chen YJ, Tang CS (2020) Knowledge sharing and learning among smallholders in developing economies: Implications, incentives, and reward mechanisms. Oper. Res. 68(2):435–452.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou J, Fan X, Chen YJ, Tang CS (2021) Information provision and farmer welfare in developing economies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(1):230–245.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.