AI, Skill, and Productivity: The Case of Taxi Drivers

References

• Acemoglu D, Autor D (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Card D, Ashenfelter O, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1043–1171.Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018) The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(6):1488–1542.Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2020) Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. J. Political Econom. 128(6):2188–2244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2022) Tasks, automation, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. Econometrica 90(5):1973–2016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Lelarge C, Restrepo P (2020) Competing with robots: Firm-level evidence from France. AEA Papers Proc. 110:383–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Autor D, Hazell J, Restrepo P (2022) Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies. J. Labor Econom. 40(S1):S293–S340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans JS, Goldfarb A (2018) Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans JS, Goldfarb A (2019) Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. J. Econom. Perspect. 33(2):31–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2023) The Turing transformation: Artificial intelligence, intelligence augmentation, and skill premiums. Brookings Center on Regulation and Markets Policy Brief, Brookings Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Agarwal N, Moehring A, Rajpurkar P, Salz T (2024) Combining human expertise with artificial intelligence: Experimental evidence from radiology. NBER Working Paper No. 31422, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Alekseeva L, Azar J, Gine M, Samila S, Taska B (2021) The demand for AI skills in the labor market. Labour Econom. 71:102002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Caldwell S, Hall JV (2021) Uber versus taxi: A driver’s eye view. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 13(3):272–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atack J, Margo R, Rhode PW (2024) De-skilling: Evidence from late nineteenth century American manufacturing. Explorations Econom. Hist. 91:101554Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J. Econom. Perspect. 29(3):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Katz LF, Kearney MS (2008) Trends in U.S. wage inequality: Revising the revisionists. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(2):300–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Katz L, Krueger AB (1998) Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? Quart. J. Econom. 113(4):1169–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1279–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babina T, Fedyk A, He A, Hodson J (2024) Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. J. Financial Econom. 151:103745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker GP, Hubbard TN (2003) Make versus buy in trucking: Asset ownership, job design, and information. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):551–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker GP, Hubbard TN (2004) Contractibility and asset ownership: On-board computers and governance in U.S. trucking. Quart. J. Econom. 119(4):1443–1479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel A, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2007) How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1721–1758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Li D, Raymond LR (2025) Generative AI at work. Quart. J. Econom. 140(2):889–942.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T, Rock D (2018a) What can machines learn, and what does it mean for occupations and the economy? AEA Papers Proc. 108:43–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2018b) Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 23–60.Google Scholar
• Bessen J (2015) Learning by Doing: The Real Connection between Innovation, Wages, and Wealth (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JH, Monahan A, Schwarcz D (2024) Lawyering in the age of artificial intelligence. Minnesota Law Rev. 109(1):147–218.Google Scholar
• Crump RK, Hotz VJ, Imbens GW, Mitnik OA (2009) Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 96(1):187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Currie J, Walker R (2011) Traffic congestion and infant health: Evidence from E-Z Pass. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 3(1):65–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deming D, Kahn LB (2018) Skill requirements across firms and labor markets: Evidence from job postings for professionals. J. Labor Econom. 36(S1):S337–S369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law Econom. Organ. 4(1):141–161.Google Scholar
• Dieterle SG, Snell A (2016) A simple diagnostic to investigate instrument validity and heterogeneous effects when using a single instrument. Labour Econom. 42:76–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doms M, Dunne T, Troske K (1997) Workers, wages, and technology. Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):253–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farber HS (2005) Is tomorrow another day? The labor supply of New York City cabdrivers. J. Political Econom. 113(1):46–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farber HS (2008) Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1069–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felten EW, Raj M, Seamans R (2018) A Method to link advances in artificial intelligence to occupational abilities. AEA Papers Proc. 108:54–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felten EW, Raj M, Seamans R (2019) The occupational impact of artificial intelligence: Labor, skills, and polarization. Preprint, submitted May 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368605.Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Katz LF (1998) The origins of technology-skill complementarity. Quart. J. Econom. 113(3):693–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Sokoloff K (1982) Women, children, and industrialization in the early republic: Evidence from the manufacturing censuses. J. Econom. Hist. 42(4):741–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong J, Png IPL (2023) Automation enables specialization: Field evidence. Management Sci. 70(3):1580–1595.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibson J, McKenzie D (2014) The development impact of a best practice seasonal worker policy. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(2):229–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grennan J, Michaely R (2020) Artificial intelligence and high-skilled work: Evidence from analysts. Research Paper No. 20-84, Swiss Finance Institute, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Haggag K, McManus B, Paci G (2017) Learning by driving: Productivity improvements by New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(1):70–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphries J (2013) Childhood and child labour in the British Industrial Revolution. Econom. Hist. Rev. 66(2):395–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (2015) Matching methods in practice: Three examples. J. Human Resources 50(2):373–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanazawa K, Kawaguchi D, Shigeoka H, Watanabe Y (2022) AI, skill, and productivity: The case of taxi drivers. NBER Working Paper No. 30612, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Kim M, Kwak DW, Lee S (2022) Home-tutoring services assisted with technology: Investigating the role of artificial intelligence using a randomized field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 59(1):79–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lafortune J, Lewis E, Tessada J (2019) People and machines: A look at the evolving relationship between capital and skill in manufacturing, 1860–1930, using immigration shocks. Rev. Econom. Statist. 101(1):30–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu M, Brynjolfsson E, Dowlatabadi J (2021) Do digital platforms reduce moral hazard? The case of Uber and taxis. Management Sci. 67(8):4665–4685.Link, Google Scholar
• Merali A (2024) Scaling laws for economic productivity: Experimental evidence in LLM-assisted translation. Preprint, submitted September 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02391.Google Scholar
• Noy S, Zhang W (2023) Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381(6654):187–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Otis NG, Clarke RP, Delecourt S, Holtz D, Koning R (2024) The uneven impact of generative AI on entrepreneurial performance. Preprint, submitted December 20, https://osf.io/preprints/osf/hdjpk_v1. Google Scholar
• Peng S, Kalliamvakou E, Cihon P, Demirer M (2023) The impact of AI on developer productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot. Preprint, submitted February 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06590.Google Scholar
• Rawley E, Simcoe TS (2013) Information technology, productivity, and asset ownership: Evidence from taxicab fleets. Organ. Sci. 24(3):831–845.Link, Google Scholar
• Tchetgen T, Walter EJS, Vansteelandt S, Martinussen T, Glymour M (2015) Instrumental variable estimation in a survival context. Epidemiology 26(3):402–410.Google Scholar
• Webb M (2020) The impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market. Preprint, submitted November 15, 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3482150.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar