Kinks as Goals: Accelerating Commissions and the Performance of Sales Teams
References
- (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Why individuals no longer rule on sales teams. Harvard Bus. Rev. (January 9), https://hbr.org/2014/01/why-the-individual-no-longer-rules-in-sales.Google Scholar
- (2017) The role of goals in motivating behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment on resource conservation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2022) Killer incentives: Rivalry, performance and risk-taking among German fighter pilots, 1939–45. Rev. Econom. Stud. 89(5):2257–2292.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon runners. Management Sci. 63(6):1657–1672.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Optimal piecewise linear income taxation. J. Public Econom. Theory 16(4):523–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Awards unbundled: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 100:44–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Do agents game their agents’ behavior? Evidence from sales managers. J. Labor Econom. 33(4):863–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) The performance effects of modular production in the apparel industry. Indust. Relat. 35(3):356–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Opportunity counts: Teams and the effectiveness of production incentives. J. Labor Econom. 25(4):613–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Motivating agents: How much does the mission matter? J. Labor Econ. 34(1):211–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1405–1454.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Competition and the ratchet effect. J. Labor Econom. 29(3):513–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Adjustment costs, firm responses, and micro vs. macro labor supply elasticities: Evidence from Danish tax records. Quart. J. Econom. 126(2):749–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. J. Political Econom. 105(6):1167–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The effects of quota frequency: Sales performance and product focus. Management Sci. 67(4):2151–2170.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Internal deadlines, drug approvals, and safety problems. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 3(1):67–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Goal setting and monetary incentives: When large stakes are not enough. Management Sci. 61(12):2926–2944.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Which tax rate do people use: Average or marginal? J. Public Econom. 56(1):79–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Bad bets: Nonlinear incentives, risk, and performance. Strategic Management J. 44(1):288–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Goal setting, academic reminders, and college success: A large-scale field experiment. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 12(1):38–66.Google Scholar
- Douthit (1976) The use of sales quotas by industrial firms. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 4:467–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Non-linear incentives and worker productivity and earnings: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Working paper no 25507, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2017) Team incentives and performance: Evidence from a retail chain. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(8):2168–2203.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Piecewise linear incentive schemes. Scand. J. Econom. 90(3):305–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Goal setting and energy conservation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 107:209–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognit. Psychol. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1932) The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning. Psychol. Rev. 39(1):25–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1938) The goal-gradient hypothesis applied to some “field-force” problems in the behavior of young children. Psychol. Rev. 45(4):271–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Do consumers respond to marginal or average price? Evidence from nonlinear electricity pricing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(2):537–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Product sales incentive spillovers to the lending market: Evidence from subprime auto loan defaults. Management Sci. 70(8):5463–5480.Google Scholar
- (1998) The role of bonus pay in salesforce compensation plans. Indust. Marketing Management 27:147–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Self-control at work. J. Political Econom. 123(6):1227–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Bunching. Annu. Rev. Econom. 8:435–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Using notches to uncover optimization frictions and structural elasticities: Theory and evidence from Pakistan. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):669–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Firm-wide incentives and mutual monitoring at Continental Airlines. J. Labor Econom. 19(4):743–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Motivational goal bracketing: An experiment. J. Econom. Theory 185:104949.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3:1–16.Google Scholar
- (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Are women more attracted to co-operation than men? Econom. J. (Lond.) 125(582):115–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) How costly is turnover? Evidence from retail. J. Labor Econom. 39(2):61–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Does uncertainty matter? Consumer behavior under three part tariffs. J. Marketing Res. 26(5):698–710.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2014) The cost of high-powered incentives: Employee gaming in enterprise software sales. J. Labor Econom. 32(2):199–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Pay practices in Fortune 1000 corporations. WorldatWork J. 12(4):45–54.Google Scholar
- (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2019) The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motiv. Sci. 5(2):93–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Randomization inference for difference-in-differences with few treated clusters. J. Econometrics 218(2):435–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Bunching to maximize tax credits: Evidence from kinks in the US tax schedule. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 12(3):402–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Salesforce Compensation, Dartnell’s 25th Survey (Dartnell Corporation, Durham, NC).Google Scholar
- (2015) Incentives and gaming in a nonlinear compensation scheme. Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, vol. 3, no. 3 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 222–243.Google Scholar
- (2017) Using accelerators to drive winning sales teams. Workspan (August):32–39.Google Scholar
- (2022) The negative consequences of loss-framed performance incentives. NBER Working Paper No. 26619, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2015) Incentives, commitments, and habit formation in exercise: Evidence from a field experiment with workers at a Fortune 500 company. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 7(3):51–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Do taxpayers bunch at kink points? Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 2(3):180–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Reference points for retirement behavior: Evidence from German pension discontinuities. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(4):1126–1165.Google Scholar
- (2017) How do quasi-random option grants affect CEO risk-taking? J. Finance 72(6):2551–2588.Crossref, Google Scholar

