A Separation of Utility and Beliefs Through Betting Consistency

References

• Abdellaoui M (2000) Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. 46(11):1497–1512.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Wakker PP (2005) The likelihood method for decision under uncertainty. Theory Decision 58:3–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Wakker PP (2020) Savage for dummies and experts. J. Econom. Theory 186:104991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Zank H (2023) Source and rank-dependent utility. Econom. Theory 75:949–981.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Baillon A, Placido L, Wakker PP (2011) The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:695–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, l’Haridon O, Paraschiv C (2013) Is there one unifying concept of utility? An experimental comparison of utility under risk and utility over time. Management Sci. 59:2153–2169.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, l’Haridon O, van Dolder D (2016) Measuring loss aversion under ambiguity: A method to make prospect theory completely observable. J. Risk Uncertainty 52:1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine. Econometrica 21:503–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alon S (2014) Derivation of a cardinal utility through a weak trade-off consistency requirement. Math. Oper. Res. 39:290–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. 34:199–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, l’Haridon O (2021) Discrete Arrow–Pratt indexes for risk and uncertainty. Econom. Theory 72:1375–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Driesen B, Wakker PP (2012) Relative concave utility for risk and ambiguity. Games Econom. Behav. 75:481–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, l’Haridon O, Placido L (2011) Ambiguity models and the machina paradoxes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:1547–1560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Huang Z, Selim A, Wakker PP (2018) Measuring ambiguity attitudes for all (natural) events. Econometrica 86:1839–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Villasís A (2015) Equal tails: A simple method to elicit utility under violations of expected utility. Decision Anal. 12:190–204.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1982) Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30:961–981.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33:1–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Birnbaum MH (2008) New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psych. Rev. 115:463–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blaschke W (1928) Topologische fragen der differentialgeometrie I. Math. Z. 28:150–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL (2000) A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. 46:1485–1496.Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL, Wakker PP (2001) Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Management Sci. 47:1498–1514.Link, Google Scholar
• Cappelli V, Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Minardi S (2021) Sources of uncertainty and subjective prices. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 19:872–912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chateauneuf A, Wakker PP (1993) From local to global additive representation. J. Math. Econom. 22:523–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chateauneuf A, Eichberger J, Grant S (2007) Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: NEO-additive capacities. J. Econom. Theory 137:538–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Karni E (1994) Choquet expected utility with a finite state space: Commutativity and act-independence. J. Econom. Theory 62:469–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Sagi JS (2006) Event exchangeability: Probabilistic sophistication without continuity or monotonicity. Econometrica 74:771–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cew SH, Wakker PP (1996) The comonotonic sure thing principle. J. Risk Uncertainty 12:5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson D, Suppes P (1956) A finitistic axiomatization of subjective probability and utility. Econometrica 24:264–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debreu G (1954) Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function. Thrall RM, Coombs CH, Davis RL, eds. Decision Processes (Wiley, New York), 159–165.Google Scholar
• Debreu G (1960) Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. Arrow KJ, Karlin S, Suppes P, eds. Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 16–26.Google Scholar
• de Finetti B (1931) Sul significato soggettivo della probabilità. Fundamenta Mathematicae 17, 298–329 [translated into English by Khale M (1993) On the subjective meaning of probability. Monari P, Cocchi D, eds. Probabilità e Induzione (Clueb, Bologna), 291–321].Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Wakker PP (2016) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62:1363–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75:643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Tversky A (1998) A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Sci. 44:879–895.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Marinacci M (2001) Risk, ambiguity, and the separation of utility and beliefs. Math. Oper. Res. 26:864–890.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Siniscalchi M (2003) A subjective spin on roulette wheels. Econometrica 71:1897–1908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman WM (1968) The structure of utility functions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 35:367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant S (1995) Subjective probability without monotonicity: Or how Machina’s mom may also be probabilistically sophisticated. Econometrica 63:159–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F (1991) A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica 59:667–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F (1992) Savage’s Theorem with a finite number of states. J. Econom. Theory 57:99–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Y (2021) Revisiting Ellsberg’s and Machina’s paradoxes: A two-stage evaluation model under ambiguity. Management Sci. 67:6897–6914.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1984) Choices, values, and frames. Amer. Psychologist 39(4):341–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karni E, Safra Z (1998) The hexagon condition and additive representation for two dimensions: An algebraic approach. J. Math. Psych. 42:393–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Kilka M, Weber M (2001) What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Management Sci. 47:1712–1726.Link, Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73:1849–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köbberling V, Wakker PP (2003) Preference foundations for nonexpected utility: A generalized and simplified technique. Math. Oper. Res. 28:395–423.Link, Google Scholar
• Kubler F, Selden L, Wei X (2017) What are asset demand tests of expected utility really testing? Econom. J. 127:784–808.Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. 92:805–824.Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53:271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ (2009) Risk, ambiguity, and the rank-dependence axioms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99:385–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ, Schmeidler D (1992) A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60:745–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miyamoto JM (1988) Generic utility theory: Measurement foundations and applications in multiattribute utility theory. J. Math. Psych. 32:357–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y (1990) Subjective expected utility with non-additive probabilities on finite state spaces. J. Econom. Theory. 51:346–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfanzagl J (1959) A general theory of measurement application to utility. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 6:283–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richter MK (1980) Continuous and semi-continuous utility. Internat. Econom. Rev. 21:293–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57:571–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt U, Zank H (2022) Chance theory: A separation of riskless and risky utility. J. Risk Uncertainty 65:1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomsen G (1927) Un teorema topologico sulle schiere di curve e una caratterizzazione geometrica delle superficie isometro-asinttotiche. Bolletino Della Unione Matematica Italiana 6:80–85.Google Scholar
• Thomsen G (1929) Topologische Fragen der Differentialgeometrie XII: Schnittpunktssätze in ebenen Gewebe. Abh. Math. Seminar Univ. Hamburg 7:99–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautmann S, Wakker PP (2018) Making the Anscombe-Aumann approach to ambiguity suitable for descriptive applications. J. Risk Uncertainty 56:83–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (1984) Cardinal coordinate independence for expected utility. J. Math. Psych. 28:110–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (1989) Additive Representations of Preferences, A New Foundation of Decision Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2004) On the composition of risk preference and belief. Psych. Rev. 111:236–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP, Deneffe D (1996) Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Sci. 42:1131–1150.Link, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP, Zank H (1999) State dependent expected utility for Savage’s state space. Math. Oper. Res. 24:8–34.Link, Google Scholar
• Werner J (2005) A simple axiomatization of risk-averse expected utility. Econom. Lett. 88:73–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu G, Gonzalez R (1999) Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Management Sci. 45:74–85.Link, Google Scholar
• Zank H (2001) Cumulative prospect theory for parametric and multiattribute utilities. Math. Oper. Res. 26:67–81.Link, Google Scholar