Political Heterogeneity and Societal Polarization Impair Individual Performance: Evidence from Random Assignment in Professional Golf

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01798

References

  • American National Election Studies (2023) The ANES guide to public opinion and electoral behavior: Affective polarization of ideologues: In-group and out-group feelings. Accessed April 8, 2023, https://electionstudies.org/data-tools/anes-guide/anes-guide.html?chart=affective_polarization_idelogues.Google Scholar
  • Anantharaman A, Grandey AA (2021) Does political diversity predict organizational dissatisfaction? Salience of presidential elections. Acad. Management Proc. 2021(1):12171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist JD (2014) The perils of peer effects. Labour Econom. 30:98–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Antonio AL, Chang MJ, Hakuta K, Kenny DA, Levin S, Milem JF (2004) Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psych. Sci. 15(8):507–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arbatli CE, Ashraf QH, Galor O, Klemp M (2020) Diversity and conflict. Econometrica 88(2):727–797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aubert V (1963) Competition and dissensus: Two types of conflict and of conflict resolution. Conflict Resolution 7(1):26–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azzimonti M (2014) Partisan conflict. Working Paper No. 14-19, Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Azzimonti M (2018) Partisan conflict and private investment. J. Monetary Econom. 93:114–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2009) Social connections and incentives in the workplace: Evidence from personnel data. Econometrica 77(4):1047–1094.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. 117(2):497–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF, Showers CJ (1986) A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 16(4):361–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bazzi S, Gaduh A, Rothenberg AD, Wong M (2019) Unity in diversity? How intergroup contact can foster nation building. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(11):3978–4025.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellemare C, Lepage P, Shearer B (2010) Peer pressure, incentives, and gender: An experimental analysis of motivation in the workplace. Labour Econom. 17(1):276–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billig M, Tajfel H (1973) Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 3(1):27–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bond CF (1982) Social facilitation: A self-presentational view. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 42(6):1042–1050.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonomi G, Gennaioli N, Tabellini G (2021) Identity, beliefs, and political conflict. Quart. J. Econom. 136(4):2371–2411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bramoullé Y, Djebbari H, Fortin B (2020) Peer effects in networks: A survey. Annual Rev. Econom. 12:603–629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB (1999) The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? J. Soc. Issues 55(3):429–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB (2007) The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. Amer. Psych. 62(8):728–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brief AP, Umphress EE, Dietz J, Burrows JW, Butz RM, Scholten L (2005) Community matters: Realistic group conflict theory and the impact of diversity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):830–844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broadie M, Rendleman RJ (2013) Are the Official World Golf Rankings biased? J. Quant. Anal. Sports 9(2):127–140.Google Scholar
  • Byrne D (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chua RYJ (2013) The costs of ambient cultural disharmony: Indirect intercultural conflicts in social environment undermine creativity. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1545–1577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook D, Gansneder B, Rotella R, Malone C, Bunker L, Owens D (1983) Relationship among competitive state anxiety, ability, and golf performance. J. Sport Psych. 5(4):460–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corritore M, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2020) Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):359–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • DataGolf (2024). Accessed January 25, 2025, https://datagolf.com/.Google Scholar
  • Derakshan N, Eysenck MW (2009) Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: New developments from attentional control theory. Eur. Psych. 14(2):168–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duarte JL, Crawford JT, Stern C, Haidt J, Jussim L, Tetlock PE (2015) Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behav. Brain Sci. 38:e130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ertug G, Brennecke J, Kovács B, Zou T (2022) What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):38–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esteban J, Mayoral L, Ray D (2012a) Ethnicity and conflict: An empirical study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1310–1342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esteban J, Mayoral L, Ray D (2012b) Ethnicity and conflict: Theory and facts. Science 336(6083):858–865.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans RB, Prado MP, Rizzo AE, Zambrana R (2025) Identity, diversity, and team performance: Evidence from U.S. mutual funds. Management Sci. 71(4):3026–3051.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG (2007) Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion 7(2):336–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (2023) Partisan conflict index. Accessed January 25, 2025, https://www.philadelphiafed.org/surveys-and-data/macroeconomic-data/partisan-conflict-index.Google Scholar
  • Feinstein J (1995) A Good Walk Spoiled: Days and Nights on the PGA Tour (Little, Brown and Company, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Flynn FJ, Amanatullah ET (2012) Psyched up or psyched out? The influence of coactor status on individual performance. Organ. Sci. 23(2):402–415.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallagher T (2020) Quoted in a 2020 interview. Accessed May 12, 2023, https://web.archive.org/web/20201010011214/https://www.health.com/condition/stress/election-stress-disorder.Google Scholar
  • Gift K, Gift T (2015) Does politics influence hiring? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Political Behav. 37(3):653–675.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golf (2016) SI anonymous player poll: PGA, champions, LPGA pros sound off. Accessed February 25, 2023, https://golf.com/news/si-anonymous-player-poll-pga-champions-lpga-pros-sound-off/.Google Scholar
  • GolfDigest (2012) When it comes to politics, most tour players lean right. Accessed April 8, 2023, https://www.golfdigest.com/story/when-it-comes-to-politics-most-tour-players-lean-right.Google Scholar
  • Green DP, Palmquist B, Schickler E (2002) Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Greer LL, Dannals JE (2017) Conflict in teams. Salas E, Rico R, Passmore J, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Team Working and Collaborative Processes, 1st ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 317–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guryan J, Kroft K, Notowidigdo MJ (2009a) Peer effects in the workplace: Evidence from random groupings in professional golf tournaments. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(4):34–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guryan J, Kroft K, Notowidigdo MJ (2009b) Replication data for: Peer effects in the workplace: Evidence from random groupings in professional golf tournaments. American Economic Association Data Archive (October 12), https://doi.org/10.3886/E113575V1.Google Scholar
  • Han JH, Shin D, Castellano WG, Konrad AM, Kruse DL, Blasi JR (2020) Creating mutual gains to leverage a racially diverse workforce: The effects of firm-level racial diversity on financial and workforce outcomes under the use of broad-based stock options. Organ. Sci. 31(6):1515–1537.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hellström J (2009) Psychological hallmarks of skilled golfers. Sports Medicine 39(10):845–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hickman DC, Metz NE (2018) Peer effects in a competitive environment: Evidence from the PGA Tour. Econom. Inquiry 56(1):208–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hjort J (2014) Ethnic divisions and production in firms. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1899–1946.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber GA, Malhotra N (2017) Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. J. Politics 79(1):269–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar S, Sood G, Lelkes Y (2012) Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quart. 76(3):405–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar S, Lelkes Y, Levendusky M, Malhotra N, Westwood SJ (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 22:129–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahane L, Lonley N, Simmons R (2013) The effects of coworker heterogeneity on form-level output: Assessing the impacts of cultural and language diversity in the National Hockey League. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(1):302–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kammeyer-Mueller JD, Simon LS, Rich BL (2012) The psychic cost of doing wrong: Ethical conflict, divestiture socialization, and emotional exhaustion. J. Management 38(3):784–808.Google Scholar
  • Kang Y, Chin MK, Zhu DH (2021) How ideological diversity within top management teams influences strategic dynamism. Acad. Management Proc. 2021(1):14225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim I, Pantzalis C, Park JC (2013) Corporate boards’ political ideology diversity and firm performance. J. Empirical Finance 21:223–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimbrough EO, Sheremeta RM (2019) Theories of conflict and war. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 159:384–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King EB, Dawson JF, West MA, Gilrane CI, Bastin L (2011) Why organizational and community diversity matter: Representativeness and the emergence of incivility and organizational performance. Acad. Management J. 54(6):1103–1118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J, Lee KJ, Nagarajan NJ (2014) Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors. J. Financial Econom. 112(2):232–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leslie LM (2017) A status-based multilevel model of ethnic diversity and work unit performance. J. Management 43(2):426–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyons E (2017) Team production in international labor markets: Experimental evidence from the field. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(3):70–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mannix E (2003) Editor’s comments: Conflict and conflict resolution—A return to theorizing. Acad. Management Rev. 28(4):543–546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McConnell C, Malhotra N, Margalit Y, Levendusky M (2018) The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. Amer. J. Political Sci. 62(1):5–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohammed S, Angell LC (2004) Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. J. Organ. Behav. 25(8):1015–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moulton BR (1990) An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Rev. Econom. Statist. 72(2):334–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mutz DC, Mondak JJ (2006) The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. J. Politics 68(1):140–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narayan S, Sindhu JS, Volberda HW (2021) From attention to action: The influence of cognitive and ideological diversity in top management teams on business model innovation. J. Management Stud. 58(8):2082–2110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oakes PJ (1987) The salience of social categories. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS, eds. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 117–141.Google Scholar
  • Off the Ball (2021) “Trump is them and they are him.” Donald Trump’s relationships with PGA Tour golfers. Accessed February 25, 2023, https://www.offtheball.com/golf/trump-toxic-pga-tour-golfers-1133425.Google Scholar
  • Official World Golf Ranking (2024). Accessed January 25, 2025, https://www.owgr.com/.Google Scholar
  • Olthuis B, van den Oever K (2020) The board of directors and CSR: How does ideological diversity on the board impact CSR? J. Cleaner Prod. 251:119789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park S, Mathieu JE, Grosser TJ (2020) A network conceptualization of team conflict. Acad. Management Rev. 45(2):352–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puryear C, Kubin E, Schein C, Bigman YE, Ekstrom P, Gray K (2024) People believe political opponents accept blatant moral wrongs, fueling partisan divides. PNAS Nexus 3(7):pgae244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranganathan A, Das A (2023) Marching to her own beat: Asynchronous teamwork and gender differences in performance on creative projects. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 88(5):901–937.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockey J, Zakir N (2020) When two tribes go to work: Board political diversity and firm performance. Sci. Adv. 63:1–25.Google Scholar
  • Rouse CE, Paluck EL, Chin JC, Wickett A, Pezzuto JH (2019) The impact of ideological diversity on educational performance: A pilot study. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  • Schmader T, Johns M (2003) Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3):440–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shayo M, Zussman A (2017) Conflict and the persistence of ethnic bias. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(4):137–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shi F, Teplitskiy M, Duede E, Evans JA (2019) The wisdom of polarized crowds. Nature Human Behav. 3(4):329–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Society for Human Resource Management (2022) SHRM study reveals 20% of workers mistreated due to political views. Accessed January 25, 2025, https://www.shrm.org/about/press-room/shrm-study-reveals-20-workers-mistreated-due-to-political-views.Google Scholar
  • Spenkuch JL, Teso E, Xu G (2023) Ideology and performance in public organizations. Econometrica 91(4):1171–1203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stosny S (2017) He once called it “election stress disorder.” Now the therapist says we’re suffering from this. Washington Post (February 6), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2017/02/06/suffering-from-headline-stress-disorder-since-trumps-win-youre-definitely-not-alone/.Google Scholar
  • Swigart KL, Anantharaman A, Williamson JA, Grandey AA (2020) Working while liberal/conservative: A review of political ideology in organizations. J. Management 46(6):1063–1091.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
  • The Versed (2016) I find it strange that one of golf’s most liberally-minded players is a Republican. Accessed February 25, 2023, https://web.archive.org/web/20201024171918/https://www.theversed.com/62519/i-find-it-strange-that-one-of-golfs-most-liberally-minded-player-is-a-republican/#.lRLtRLyBaP.Google Scholar
  • Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Van der Doef M, Maes S (1999) The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress 13(2):87–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58:515–541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Voteview (2023). Accessed April 8, 2023, https://voteview.com.Google Scholar
  • Westfall J, Van Boven L, Chambers JR, Judd CM (2015) Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives Psych. Sci. 10(2):145–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140.Google Scholar
  • Zajonc RB (1965) Social facilitation. Science 149(3681):269–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman F, Garbulsky G, Ariely D, Sigman M, Navajas J (2022) Political coherence and certainty as drivers of interpersonal liking over and above similarity. Sci. Adv. 8(6):1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.