Are People Willing to Pay for Reduced Inequality?

References

• Acemoglu D, Autor D (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, New York), 1043–1171.Google Scholar
• ADEME (2020) Eco-score. Accessed June 6, 2023, https://docs.score-environnemental.com/v/en/.Google Scholar
• AFL-CIO (2020) Company pay ratios. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://aflcio.org/paywatch/company-pay-ratios.Google Scholar
• Almås I, Cappelen AW, Tungodden B (2020) Cutthroat capitalism vs. cuddly socialism: Are Americans more meritocratic and efficiency-seeking than Scandinavians? J. Political Econom. 128(5):705551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almås I, Cappelen AW, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2010) Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science 328(5982):1176–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andorfer VA, Liebe U (2012) Research on fair trade consumption—A review. J. Bus. Ethics 106(4):415–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Vesterlund L (2001) Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):293–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkinson AB (2008) The Changing Distribution of Earnings in OECD Countries (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkinson AB, Piketty T, Saez E (2011) Top incomes in the long run of history. J. Econom. Literature 49(1):3–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Weber RA, Yao L (2015) Do markets erode social responsibility? Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):219–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benedetti AH, Chen S (2018) High CEO-to-worker pay ratios negatively impact consumer and employee perceptions of companies. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 79:378–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bostic R, Herrnstein RJ, Luce RD (1990) The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 13(2):193–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breyer F, Weimann J (2015) Of morals, markets and mice: Be careful drawing policy conclusions from experimental findings! Eur. J. Political Econom. 40:387–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Falch R, Tungodden B (2020) Fair and unfair income inequality. Zimmermann KF, ed. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Konow J, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013) Just luck: An experimental study of risk-taking and fairness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1398–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakravarty SR (2009) Inequality, Polarization and Poverty: Advances in Distributional Analysis (Springer, New York), 1–46.Google Scholar
• Charness G, Fehr E (2015) From the laboratory to the real world. Science 350(6260):512–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CIPD (2020) Executive pay in the FTSE 100: Is everyone getting a fair slice of the cake? Accessed June 17, 2020, https://www.cipd.co.uk/Images/ftse-100-executive-pay-report-2019_tcm18-62886.pdf.Google Scholar
• Clark AE, d’Ambrosio C (2015) Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence. Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 2 (Elsevier, New York), 1147–1208.Google Scholar
• Clery E, Curtice J, Harding R (2017) British social attitudes 34. Accessed September 6, 2023, https://bsa.natcen.ac.uk/.Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Kadach I, Ormazabal G, Reichelstein S (2023) Executive compensation tied to ESG performance: International evidence. J. Accounting Res. 61(3):805–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornsweet TN (1962) The staircase-method in psychophysics. Amer. J. Psych. 75(3):485–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowell F (2011) Measuring Inequality (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosetto P, Lacroix A, Muller L, Ruffieux B (2020) Nutritional and economic impact of five alternative front-of-pack nutritional labels: Experimental evidence. Eur. Rev. Agricultural Econom. 47(2):785–818.Google Scholar
• Curtice J, Clery E, Perry J, Phillips M, Rahim N (2019) British social attitudes 36. Accessed September 6, 2023, https://bsa.natcen.ac.uk/.Google Scholar
• De Pelsmacker P, Driesen L, Rayp G (2005) Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. J. Consumer Affairs 39(2):363–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deaton A (2021) Republic of unequals. Prospect Magazine (January 4). Accessed March 25, 2021, https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/opinions/us-inequality-wealth-divide.Google Scholar
• Dubois P, Albuquerque P, Allais O, Bonnet C, Bertail P, Combris P, Lahlou S, et al. (2021) Effects of front-of-pack labels on the nutritional quality of supermarket food purchases: Evidence from a large-scale randomized controlled trial. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 49(1):119–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (1998) Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments. Econom. J. (London) 108(448):726–735.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020) European Union Energy label and ecodesign. Accessed September 6, 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/info/energy-climate-change-environment/standards-tools-and-labels/products-labelling-rules-and-requirements/energy-label-and-ecodesign_en.Google Scholar
• Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Laboratory experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Szech N (2013) Morals and markets. Science 340(6133):707–711.Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2003) Theories of fairness and reciprocity-evidence and economic applications. Dewatripont M, Hansen LP, Turnovsky SJ, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, vol. 1 of Econometric Society Monographs (Cambridge University Press, New York), 208–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2006) The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism–Experimental evidence and new theories. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity (North Holland, Amsterdam), 615–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleurbaey M (2008) Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güth W, Van Damme E (1998) Information, strategic behavior, and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: An experimental study. J. Math. Psych. 42(2–3):227–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haaland I, Roth C, Wohlfart J (2023) Designing information provision experiments. J. Econom. Literature 61(1):3–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hainmueller J, Hiscox MJ, Sequeira S (2015) Consumer demand for fair trade: Evidence from a multistore field experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 97(2):242–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, Rutström EE (2008) Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results (North Holland, Amsterdam), 752–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill B (2023) Being up front about income inequality. Accessed September 6, 2023, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3515349.Google Scholar
• Hiscox MJ, Broukhim M, Litwin C (2011) Consumer demand for fair trade: New evidence from a field experiment using eBay auctions of fresh roasted coffee. Preprint, submitted April 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1811783.Google Scholar
• ISSP Research Group (2017) International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality IV-ISSP 2009. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5400 Data file Version 4.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12777.Google Scholar
• Julia C, Etilé F, Hercberg S (2018) Front-of-pack Nutri-Score labelling in France: An evidence-based policy. Lancet Public Health 3(4):e164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz LF, Autor DH (1999) Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3 (Elsevier, New York), 1463–1555.Google Scholar
• Kiatpongsan S, Norton MI (2014) How much (more) should CEOs make? A universal desire for more equal pay. Perspective Psych. Sci. 9(6):587–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konow J (2000) Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1072–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krumpal I (2013) Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Qual. Quant. 47(4):2025–2047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuziemko I, Norton MI, Saez E, Stantcheva S (2015) How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(4):1478–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohan B, Norton MI, Deshpandé R (2015) Paying up for fair pay: Consumers prefer firms with lower CEO-to-worker pay ratios. Working paper, Marketing Unit, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Mohan B, Schlager T, Deshpandé R, Norton MI (2018) Consumers avoid buying from firms with higher CEO-to-worker pay ratios. J. Consumer Psych. 28(2):344–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morais F, Kakabadse NK (2014) The corporate gini index (cgi) determinants and advantages: Lessons from a multinational retail company case study. Internat. J. Disclosure Governing 11(4):380–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mummolo J, Peterson E (2018) Demand effects in survey experiments: An empirical assessment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 113:517–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• OECD (2020) Income inequality. Accessed September 6, 2023, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/459aa7f1-en.Google Scholar
• Orton M, Rowlingson K (2007) Public Attitudes to Economic Inequality, vol. 4 (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, UK).Google Scholar
• Osberg L, Smeeding T (2006) “Fair” inequality? Attitudes toward pay differentials: The United States in comparative perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(3):450–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pigors M, Rockenbach B (2016) Consumer social responsibility. Management Sci. 62(11):3123–3137.Link, Google Scholar
• Piketty T (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Bank (2020) Gini index (world bank estimate). Accessed April 27, 2020, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI.Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (2014) Global risks 2014, 9th ed. Accessed July 22, 2020, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalRisks_Report_2014.pdf.Google Scholar