The Unequal Diffusion of Honesty and Dishonesty in Workplace Networks

References

• Abbink K (2004) Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. Eur. J. Political Econom. 20(4):887–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alm J, Bloomquist KM, McKee M (2017) When you know your neighbour pays taxes: Information, peer effects and tax compliance. Fiscal Stud. 38(4):587–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2018) Report to the nations: 2018 Global study on occupational fraud and abuse. Technical report, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
• Aven B, Morse L, Iorio A (2021) The valley of trust: The effect of relational strength on monitoring quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 166:179–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2000) Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: A study of the Indian software industry. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):989–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boucher V, Rendall M, Ushchev P, Zenou Y (2024) Toward a general theory of peer effects. Econometrica 92(2):543–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Ostermaier A (2019) Peer influence on managerial honesty: The role of transparency and expectations. J. Bus. Ethics 154(1):127–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014a) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014b) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Chen Y, Pierce L, Snow D (2021) The influence of peers in worker misconduct: Evidence from restaurant theft. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):952–973.Link, Google Scholar
• Chui C, Kouchaki M, Gino F (2021) “Many others are doing it, so why shouldn’t I?”: How being in larger competitions leads to more cheating. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 164:102–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colzani P, Michailidou G, Santos-Pinto L (2023) Experimental evidence on the transmission of honesty and dishonesty: A stairway to heaven and a highway to hell. Econom. Lett. 231:111257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conrads J, Irlenbusch B, Michael Rilke R, Walkowitz G (2013) Lying and team incentives. J. Econom. Psych. 34:1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai Z, Galeotti F, Villeval MC (2017) Cheating in the lab predicts fraud in the field: An experiment in public transportation. Management Sci. 64(3):1081–1100.Link, Google Scholar
• Dimant E (2019) Contagion of pro- and anti-social behavior among peers and the role of social proximity. J. Econom. Psych. 73:66–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrali R (2020) Partners in crime? A theory of corruption as a criminal network. Games Econom. Behav. 124:319–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fowler JH, Heaney MT, Nickerson DW, Padgett JF, Sinclair B (2011) Causality in political networks. Amer. Politics Res. 39(2):437–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frake J, Harmon D (2024) Intergenerational transmission of organizational misconduct: Evidence from the Chicago Police Department. Management Sci. 70(6):3856–3878.Link, Google Scholar
• Gerlach P, Teodorescu K, Hertwig R (2019) The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior. Psych. Bull. 145(1):1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Ayal S, Ariely D (2009) Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior—The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psych. Sci. 20(3):393–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross J, Leib M, Offerman T, Shalvi S (2018) Ethical free riding: When honest people find dishonest partners. Psych. Sci. 29(12):1956–1968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Koning R (2019) Prior ties and the limits of peer effects on startup team performance. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1394–1416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helzer EG, Cohen TR, Kim Y, Iorio A, Aven B (2024) Moral beacons: Understanding moral character and moral influence. J. Personality 92(3):735–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichino A, Maggi G (2000) Work environment and individual background: Explaining regional shirking differentials in a large Italian firm. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):1057–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Innes R, Mitra A (2013) Is dishonesty contagious? Econom. Inquiry 51(1):722–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO, Rogers BW (2007) Relating network structure to diffusion properties through stochastic dominance. B.E. J. Theoret. Econom. 7(1):0000102202193517041341.Google Scholar
• Lamberson PJ (2010) Social learning in social networks. B.E. J. Theoret. Econom. 10(1):0000102202193517041616.Google Scholar
• Leib M, Köbis N, Soraperra I, Weisel O, Shalvi S (2021) Collaborative dishonesty: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 147(12):1241–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Q, Lourie B, Nekrasov A, Shevlin T (2022) Employee turnover and firm performance: Large-sample archival evidence. Management Sci. 68(8):5667–5683.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindquist MJ, Sauermann J, Zenou Y (2022) Peer effects in the workplace: A network approach. Working paper, Stockholm University, Stockholm; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Google Scholar
• López-Pintado D (2008) Diffusion in complex social networks. Games Econom. Behav. 62(2):573–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macchiavello R, Morjaria A (2015) The value of relationships: Evidence from a supply shock to Kenyan rose exports. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(9):2911–2945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazar N, Ariely D (2006) Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. J. Public Policy Marketing 25(1):117–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohliver A (2019) How misconduct spreads: Auditors’ role in the diffusion of stock-option backdating. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):310–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Moore C (2016) Social networks and organizational wrongdoing in context. Palmer D, Smith-Crowe K, Greenwood R, eds. Organizational Wrongdoing: Key Perspectives and New Directions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 203–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Yenkey CB (2015) Drugs, sweat, and gears: An organizational analysis of performance-enhancing drug use in the 2010 Tour de France. Soc. Forces 94(2):891–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snyder J (2008) Ethical spillovers in firms: Evidence from vehicle emissions testing. Management Sci. 54(11):1891–1903.Link, Google Scholar
• Quispe-Torreblanca EG, Stewart N (2019) Causal peer effects in police misconduct. Nature Human Behav. 3(8):797–807.Google Scholar
• Rahwan Z, Yoeli E, Fasolo B (2019) Heterogeneity in banker culture and its influence on dishonesty. Nature 575(7782):345–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman S, Palifka BJ (2016) Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinsonc DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.Link, Google Scholar
• Tarbush B, Teytelboym A (2017) Social groups and social network formation. Games Econom. Behav. 103:286–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treviño LK, den Nieuwenboer NA, Kish-Gephart JJ (2014) (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Rev. Psych. 65(1):635–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valente TW (2012) Network interventions. Science 337(6090):49–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ, An W (2013) Social networks and causal inference. Morgan SL, ed. Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 353–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisel O, Shalvi S (2015) The collaborative roots of corruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(34):10651–10656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yenkey CB (2018) Fraud and market participation: Social relations as a moderator of organizational misconduct. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):43–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang V, King MD (2021) Tie decay and dissolution: Contentious prescribing practices in the prescription drug epidemic. Organ. Sci. 32(5):1149–1173.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang V, Mohliver AC, King M (2023) Where is all the deviance? Liminal prescribing and the social networks underlying the prescription drug crisis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(1):228–269.Crossref, Google Scholar