Measurement for Dummies? Exploring the Role of Regulatory Metrics and Firm Strategy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01987

References

  • Agarwal S (2020) Biodegradable polymers: Present opportunities and challenges in providing a microplastic-free environment. Macromolecular Chemistry Phys. 221(2000017):1–7.Google Scholar
  • Aghion P, Dechezleprêtre A, Hemous D, Martin R, Van Reenen J (2016) Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: Evidence from the auto industry. J. Political Econom. 124(1):1–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Rosell C, Simcoe T (2020) Tax credits and small firm R&D spending. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 12(2):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arora A, Gambardella A (1994) The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Res. Policy 23(5):523–532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Stern S (2002) The impact of information technology on emergency health care outcomes. RAND J. Econom. 33(3):399–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker GP (1992) Incentive contracts and performance measurement. J. Political Econom. 100(3):598–614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barwick PJ, Kwon HS, Li S, Wang Y, Zahur NB (2024) Industrial policies and innovation: Evidence from the global automobile industry. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2014) Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(2):608–650.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berman EP, Hirschman D (2018) The sociology of quantification: Where are we now? Contemporary Sociol. 47(3):257–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blind K (2012) The influence of regulations on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries. Res. Policy 41(2):391–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J, Williams H (2019) A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. J. Econom. Perspective 33(3):163–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J (2024) Revisiting event-study designs: Robust and efficient estimation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 91(6):3253–3285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF, Yao DA (1985) The nonpecuniary costs of automobile emissions standards. RAND J. Econom. 16(4):437–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Browne AL (1995) 2-ply windshields: Laboratory impactor tests of the polyurethane construction (SAE Technical Paper No. 950048). Technical report, SAE International, Warrendale, PA. Google Scholar
  • Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econom. 225(2):200–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023) Seat belts: Get the facts. Accessed October 28, 2023, https://www.cdc.gov/seat-belts/facts/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/transportationsafety/seatbeltbrief/index.html.Google Scholar
  • Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2010) How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management J. 31(9):917–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das S (2001) The cost of automotive polymer composites: A review and assessment of doe’s lightweight materials composites research. Technical report, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Doshi AR, Dowell GW, Toffel MW (2013) How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1209–1231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsworth P (1994) Driving smart; the first side-impact air bags: How Volvo’s system works. New York Times (October 2), https://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/02/automobiles/driving-smart-the-first-side-impact-air-bags-how-volvo-s-system-works.html.Google Scholar
  • Espeland W (1993) Power, policy and paperwork: The bureaucratic representation of interests. Quality Sociol. 16(3):297–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espeland W, Sauder M (2016) Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D, Roy RR (2008) The dual role of modularity: Innovation and imitation. Management Sci. 54(5):939–955.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein A (2004) Static and dynamic effects of health policy: Evidence from the vaccine industry. Quart. J. Econom. 119(2):527–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galasso A, Luo H (2017) Tort reform and innovation. J. Law Econom. 60(3):385–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galasso A, Luo H (2021) Risk-mitigating technologies: The case of radiation diagnostic devices. Management Sci. 67(5):3022–3040.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galasso A, Luo H (2022) When does product liability risk chill innovation? Evidence from medical implants. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 14(2):366–401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econom. 225(2):254–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenstein S (1993) Markets, standards, and the information infrastructure. IEEE Micro 13(6):36–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grieco PL, Murry C, Yurukoglu A (2024) The evolution of market power in the US automobile industry. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):1201–1253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7:24–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard TN (2000) The demand for monitoring technologies: The case of trucking. Quart. J. Econom. 115(2):533–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ishiyama S, Tsukada K, Nishigaki H, Ikeda Y, Sakuma S, Matsuoka F, Kanno Y, et al. (1994) Development of an abdominal deformation measuring system for hybrid iii dummy (SAE Technical Paper No. 942223). Technical report, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.Google Scholar
  • Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Rev. Econom. Statist. 79(4):610–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson MS (2020) Regulation by shaming: Deterrence effects of publicizing violations of workplace safety and health laws. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(6):1866–1904.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kawamura N, Nomura T, Nishio T (1996) Super olefin polymer for material consolidation of automotive interior plastic parts. Technical report, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.Google Scholar
  • Kerr (1975) On the folly of rewarding a, while hoping for b. Acad. Management J. 18(4):769–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khalil TB, Lin TC (1994) Simulation of the hybrid III dummy response to impact by nonlinear finite element analysis. Technical report, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.Google Scholar
  • Kuhn TS (1961) The function of measurement in modern physical science. Isis 52(2):161–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leslie H (2015) Plastic in Cosmetics: Are we polluting the environment through our personal care?: Plastic ingredients that contribute to marine microplastic litter. Technical report, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, KE.Google Scholar
  • Li X, Simcoe T (2021) Competing or complementary labels? Estimating spillovers in Chinese green building certification. Strategic Management J. 42(13):2451–2476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G, Sunstein CR, Golman R (2014) Disclosure: Psychology changes everything. Ann. Rev. Econom. 6(1):391–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martins LL (2005) A model of the effects of reputational rankings on organizational change. Organ. Sci. 16(6):701–720.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marx M, Fuegi A (2020) Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles. Strategic Management J. 41(9):1572–1594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1994) Federal motor vehicle safety standards: Side impact protection. Federal Register 59(1):118–140.Google Scholar
  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2014) Occupant protection in passenger vehicles. Technical Report No. DOT HS 812 069, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • National Safety Council (2023) Seat belts. Accessed October 28, 2023, https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/occupant-protection/seat-belts/.Google Scholar
  • Nelson RR (1995) Why should managers be thinking about technology policy? Strategic Management J. 16(8):581–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • NHTSA (1990) Amendment of federal motor vehicle safety standards; side impact protection. Federal Register 55(210):45719–45757.Google Scholar
  • NHTSA (1995) National highway traffic safety administration performance report: FY 1994. Technical report, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).Google Scholar
  • Porter T (1995) Trust in Numbers (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econom. Perspective 9(4):97–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rambachan A, Roth J (2023) A more credible approach to parallel trends. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2555–2591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranganathan A, Benson A (2020) A numbers game: Quantification of work, auto-gamification, and worker productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 85(4):573–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose NL (1990) Profitability and product quality: Economic determinants of airline safety performance. J. Political Econom. 98(5, Part 1):944–964.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose NL (1992) Fear of flying? Economic analyses of airline safety. J. Econom. Perspective 6(2):75–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Rosenberg N, Nathan R (1994) Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryall MD (2009) Causal ambiguity, complexity, and capability-based advantage. Management Sci. 55(3):389–403.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rysman M, Simcoe T, Wang Y (2020) Differentiation strategies in the adoption of environmental standards: Leed from 2000 to 2014. Management Sci. 66(9):4173–4192.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Samaha RR, Elliott DS (2003) NHTSA side impact research: Motivation for upgraded test procedures. Proc. 18th Internat. Technical Conf. Enhanced Safety Vehicles (US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC), 1–17. Google Scholar
  • Sauder M, Espeland WN (2009) The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):63–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaffer B (1995) Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. J. Management 21(3):495–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management J. 19(8):729–753.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simcoe T, Toffel MW (2014) Government green procurement spillovers: Evidence from municipal building policies in California. J. Environ. Econom. Management 68(3):411–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strathern M (1997) Improving ratings: Audit in the British university system. Eur. Rev. 5(3):305–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Podolny JM (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):21–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun L, Abraham S (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J. Econom. 225(2):175–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viscusi WK, Moore MJ (1993) Product liability, research and development, and innovation. J. Political Econom. 101(1):161–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward’s Auto (1996) Safety: The side-bag boom; gm plans big blowout for ‘97 model year. Accessed October 30, 2024, https://www.wardsauto.com/general-motors/safety-the-side-bag-boom-gm-plans-big-blowout-for-97-model-year.Google Scholar
  • Wray J (2018) BASF launches new biodegradable cosmetic ingredients. Accessed October 30, 2024, https://cosmeticsbusiness.com/basf-launches-new-biodegradable-cosmetic-ingredients-148140.Google Scholar
  • Yajima H, Dokko Y, Ito S, Motoyama K, Yu Q, Shiratori M (1999) The application of the statistical design support system toward optimization of vehicle safety equipment. Technical report, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.