Time Pressure Preferences

References

• Amer-Mestre J , Charpin A (2021) Gender differences in early occupational choices: Evidence from medical specialty selection. Preprint, submitted December 6, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3976273.Google Scholar
• Azmat G , Calsamiglia C , Iriberri N (2016) Gender differences in response to big stakes. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 14(6):1372–1400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A , Huang Z , Selim A , Wakker PP (2018) Measuring ambiguity attitudes for all (natural) events. Econometrica 86(5):1839–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouwmeester S , Verkoeijen PPJL , Aczel B , Barbosa F , Bègue L , Brañas-Garza P , Chmura TGH , et al. (2017) Registered replication report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012). Perspect. Psych. Sci. 12(3):527–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowden EM (1985) Accessing relevant information during problem solving: Time constraints on search in the problem space. Memory Cognition 13(3):280–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T , Yuan H (2023) Public speaking aversion. Management Sci. 69(5):2746–2760.Link, Google Scholar
• Buser T , Niederle M , Oosterbeek H (2024) Can competitiveness predict education and labor market outcomes? Evidence from incentivized choice and survey measures. Rev. Econom. Statist. 1–45.Google Scholar
• Cai X , Lu Y , Pan J , Zhong S (2019) Gender gap under pressure: Evidence from China’s national college entrance examination. Rev. Econom. Statist. 101(2):249–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DL , Schonger M , Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9(March):88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen-Szalanski JJ (1980) A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: The effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes. Organ. Behav. Human Perform. 25(1):107–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Paola M , Gioia F (2016) Who performs better under time pressure? Results from a field experiment. J. Econom. Psych. 53(April):37–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diederich A (1997) Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. J. Math. Psych. 41(3):260–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diederich A , Busemeyer JR (2003) Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time. J. Math. Psych. 47(3):304–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dilmaghani M (2020) Gender differences in performance under time constraint: Evidence from chess tournaments. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 89(December):101505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T , Falk A , Huffman D , Sunde U , Schupp J , Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Haji A , Krawczyk M , Sylwestrzak M , Zawojska E (2019) Time pressure and risk taking in auctions: A field experiment. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 78(February):68–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A , Becker A , Dohmen T , Huffman D , Sunde U (2023) The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. Management Sci. 69(4):1935–1950.Link, Google Scholar
• Falk A , Becker A , Dohmen T , Enke B , Huffman D , Sunde U (2018) Global evidence on economic preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 133(4):1645–1692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fallucchi F , Nosenzo D , Reuben E (2020) Measuring preferences for competition with experimentally-validated survey questions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 178(October):402–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I , Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillen B , Snowberg E , Yariv L (2019) Experimenting with measurement error: Techniques with applications to the Caltech cohort study. J. Political Econom. 127(4):1826–1863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U , Niederle M , Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U , List JA , Livingston JA , Qin X , Sadoff S , Xu Y (2019) Measuring success in education: The role of effort on the test itself. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 1(3):291–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iriberri N , Rey-Biel P (2019) Competitive pressure widens the gender gap in performance: Evidence from a two-stage competition in mathematics. Econom. J. 129(620):1863–1893.Google Scholar
• Kirchler M , Andersson D , Bonn C , Johannesson M , Sørensen EØ , Stefan M , Tinghög G , Västfjäll D (2017) The effect of fast and slow decisions on risk taking. J. Risk Uncertainty 54:37–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocher MG , Sutter M (2006) Time is money—Time pressure, incentives, and the quality of decision-making. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 61(3):375–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocher MG , Pahlke J , Trautmann ST (2013) Tempus fugit: Time pressure in risky decisions. Management Sci. 59(10):2380–2391.Link, Google Scholar
• Kocher MG , Schindler D , Trautmann ST , Xu Y (2019) Risk, time pressure, and selection effects. Experiment. Econom. 22(1):216–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang FR , John D , Lüdtke O , Schupp J , Wagner GG (2011) Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behav. Res. Methods 43(2):548–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindner F , Sutter M (2013) Level-k reasoning and time pressure in the 11–20 money request game. Econom. Lett. 120(3):542–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohse T , Simon SA , Konrad KA (2018) Deception under time pressure: Conscious decision or a problem of awareness? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 146(February):31–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montolio D , Taberner PA (2021) Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: A quasi-experimental design. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 191(November):1065–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA , Tenney ER (2012) Time pressure, performance, and productivity. Neale MA , Mannix EA , eds. Looking Back, Moving Forward: A Review of Group and Team-Based Research. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, vol. 15 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 305–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagler M , Rincke J , Winkler E (2022) High-pressure, high-paying jobs? Preprint, submitted December 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4291736.Google Scholar
• Ors E , Palomino F , Peyrache E (2013) Performance gender gap: Does competition matter? J. Labor Econom. 31(3):443–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG , Greene JD , Nowak MA (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489:427–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG , Brescoll VL , Everett JA , Capraro V , Barcelo H (2016) Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. J. Experiment. Psych. General 145(4):389–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG , Peysakhovich A , Kraft-Todd GT , Newman GE , Wurzbacher O , Nowak MA , Greene JD (2014) Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nat. Comm. 5(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Recalde MP , Riedl A , Vesterlund L (2018) Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games. J. Public Econom. 160(April):132–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rieskamp J , Hoffrage U (2008) Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psych. 127(2):258–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saqib NU , Chan EY (2015) Time pressure reverses risk preferences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 130(September):58–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shurchkov O (2012) Under pressure: Gender differences in output quality and quantity under competition and time constraints. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 10(5):1189–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiliopoulos L , Ortmann A (2018) The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics. Experiment. Econom. 21:383–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiliopoulos L , Ortmann A , Zhang L (2018) Complexity, attention, and choice in games under time constraints: A process analysis. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 44(10):1609–1640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M , Kocher M , Strauß S (2003) Bargaining under time pressure in an experimental ultimatum game. Econom. Lett. 81(3):341–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tinghög G , Andersson D , Bonn C , Böttiger H , Josephson C , Lundgren G , Västfjäll D , Kirchler M , Johannesson M (2013) Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature 498:E1–E2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young DL , Goodie AS , Hall DB , Wu E (2012) Decision making under time pressure, modeled in a prospect theory framework. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(2):179–188.Crossref, Google Scholar