Representing Random Utility Choice Models with Neural Networks

References

• Abernethy J, Lee C, Tewari A (2017) Perturbation techniques in online learning and optimization. Perturbations, Optimization, and Statistics, vol. 233 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 233–264.Google Scholar
• Alptekinoğlu A, Semple JH (2016) The exponomial choice model: A new alternative for assortment and price optimization. Oper. Res. 64(1):79–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Alptekinoğlu A, Semple JH (2021) Heteroscedastic exponomial choice. Oper. Res. 69(3):841–858.Link, Google Scholar
• Ammar A, Oh S, Shah D, Voloch LF (2014) What’s your choice? Learning the mixed multi-nomial. Proc. ACM Internat. Conf. Measurement Modeling Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 565–566.Google Scholar
• Bentz Y, Merunka D (2000) Neural networks and the multinomial logit for brand choice modelling: A hybrid approach. J. Forecasting 19(3):177–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berbeglia G (2018) The generalized stochastic preference choice model. Preprint, submitted March 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04244.Google Scholar
• Berthet Q, Blondel M, Teboul O, Cuturi M, Vert J-P, Bach F (2020) Learning with differentiable pertubed optimizers. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 33:9508–9519.Google Scholar
• Chen Y-C, Mišić VV (2022) Decision forest: A nonparametric approach to modeling irrational choice. Management Sci. 68(10):7090–7111.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen N, Gallego G, Tang Z (2019) The use of binary choice forests to model and estimate discrete choices. Preprint, submitted August 3, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3430886.Google Scholar
• Chierichetti F, Kumar R, Tomkins A (2018) Discrete choice, permutations, and reconstruction. Proc. 29th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 576–586.Google Scholar
• Chollet F (2015) Keras. https://keras.io.Google Scholar
• Clevert D-A, Unterthiner T, Hochreiter S (2015) Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (ELUs). Preprint, submitted November 23, https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07289.Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A (2013) Multi-class classification with maximum margin multiple kernel. Proc. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 46–54.Google Scholar
• Dalle G, Baty L, Bouvier L, Parmentier A (2022) Learning with combinatorial optimization layers: A probabilistic approach. Preprint, submitted July 27, https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.13513.Google Scholar
• Farias VF, Jagabathula S, Shah D (2013) A nonparametric approach to modeling choice with limited data. Management Sci. 59(2):305–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman J, Zhang D, Liu X, Zhang N (2018) Customer choice models versus machine learning: Finding optimal product displays on Alibaba. Oper. Res. 70(1):309–328. Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Shanthikumar JG, Xue M (2022) Consumer choice models and estimation: A review and extension. Production Oper. Management 31(2):847–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabel S, Timoshenko A (2021) Product choice with large assortments: A scalable deep-learning model. Management Sci. 68(3):1808–1827.Google Scholar
• Han Y, Zegras C, Pereira FC, Ben-Akiva M (2020) A neural-embedded choice model: TasteNet-MNL modeling taste heterogeneity with flexibility and interpretability. Preprint, submitted February 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00922.Google Scholar
• Jiang ZZ, Li J, Zhang D (2020) A high-dimensional choice model for online retailing. Preprint, submitted September 17, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3687727.Google Scholar
• Koltchinskii V, Panchenko D (2000) Rademacher processes and bounding the risk of function learning. High Dimensional Probability II (Springer, New York), 443–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers Econometrics 2:105–142.Google Scholar
• McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econometrics 15(5):447–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A, Talwalkar A (2018) Foundations of Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld N, Oshiba K, Singer Y (2020) Predicting choice with set-dependent aggregation. Proc. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 8220–8229.Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Van Roy B, Glynn PW (2006) A nonparametric approach to multiproduct pricing. Oper. Res. 54(1):82–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Shalev-Shwartz S, Ben-David S (2014) Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sifringer B, Lurkin V, Alahi A (2020) Enhancing discrete choice models with representation learning. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 140:236–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Mo B, Zhao J (2020) Deep neural networks for choice analysis: Architecture design with alternative-specific utility functions. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 112:234–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Mo B, Zhao J (2021a) Theory-based residual neural networks: A synergy of discrete choice models and deep neural networks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 146:333–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Wang Q, Bailey N, Zhao J (2021b) Deep neural networks for choice analysis: A statistical learning theory perspective. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 148:60–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams HCWL (1977) On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment Planning A 3(9):285–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wong M, Farooq B (2021) ResLogit: A residual neural network logit model for data-driven choice modelling. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Technologies 126:103050.Google Scholar