A Nonparametric Approach with Marginals for Modeling Consumer Choice
References
- (2019) Distributionally robust Markovian traffic equilibrium. Transportation Sci. 53(6):1546–1562.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) RUMs from head-to-head contests. Chadhuri K, Jegelka S, Song L, Szepesvari C, Gang N, Sabato S, eds. Proc. 39th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 162 (PMLR, New York), 452–467.Google Scholar
- (2016) The exponomial choice model: A new alternative for assortment and price optimization. Oper. Res. 64(1):79–93.Link, Google Scholar
- (2025) Representing random utility choice models with neural networks. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print November 17, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02189.Link, Google Scholar
- (1986) Falmagne and the rationalizability of stochastic choices in terms of random orderings. Econometrica 54(3):707–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Discrete choice models based on random walks. Oper. Res. Lett. 44(2):234–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Assortment optimisation under a general discrete choice model: A tight analysis of revenue-ordered assortments. Algorithmica 82:681–720.Google Scholar
- (2014) Identification in differentiated products markets using market level data. Econometrica 82(5):1749–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 29(6):471–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) A Markov chain approximation to choice modeling. Oper. Res. 64(4):886–905.Link, Google Scholar
- (1974) Random orderings and stochastic theories of response (1960). Marschak J, ed. Economic Information, Decision, and Prediction: Selected Essays: Volume I Part I Economics of Decision, Theory and Decision Library, vol. 7–1 (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 172–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Decision forest: A nonparametric approach to modeling irrational choice. Management Sci. 68(10):7090–7111.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) The use of binary choice forests to model and estimate discrete choices. Preprint, submitted August 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.01109.Google Scholar
- (2022) Distributionally robust linear and discrete optimization with marginals. Oper. Res. 70(3):1822–1834.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Market counterfactuals and the specification of multiproduct demand: A nonparametric approach. Quant. Econom. 13(2):545–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Maximum likelihood estimator for choice-based samples. Econometrica 49(5):1289–1316.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Multinomial Probit: The Theory and Its Application to Demand Forecasting (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (2001) Rank aggregation methods for the web. Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 613–622.Google Scholar
- (1978) A representation theorem for finite random scale systems. J. Math. Psych. 18(1):52–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) A nonparametric approach to modeling choice with limited data. Management Sci. 59(2):305–322.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Online contention resolution schemes with applications to Bayesian selection problems. SIAM J. Comput. 50(2):255–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Technical note—On the relation between several discrete choice models. Oper. Res. 65(6):1429–1731.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) A short proof of a theorem of Falmagne. J. Math. Psych. 48(1):80–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility. Econometrica 83(6):2371–2409.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) On the global convergence of stochastic fictitious play. Econometrica 70(6):2265–2294.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The limit of rationality in choice modeling: Formulation, computation, and implications. Management Sci. 65(5):2196–2215.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2025) Pricing analytics for ancillary products: Learning from conversion data to optimize revenue. Preprint, submitted June 13, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5285522.Google Scholar
- (1959) Individual Choice Behavior (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
- (1977) The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica 45(8):1977–1988.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Alternative estimators and sample designs for discrete choice analysis. Manski CF, McFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 2–50.Google Scholar
- (1960) Binary-Choice Constraints and Random Utility Indicators (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 218–239.Google Scholar
- (1995) Microeconomic Theory, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
- (1978) Modelling the choice of residential location. Karlqvist A, Snickars F, Weibull J, eds. Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (North Holland, Amsterdam), 75–96.Google Scholar
- (1980) Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. J. Bus. 53(3):S13–S29.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Revealed stochastic preference: A synthesis. Aliprantis CD, Matzkin RL, McFadden DL, Moore JC, Yannelis NC, eds. Rationality and Equilibrium, Studies in Economic Theory, vol. 26 (Springer, Berlin), 1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Stochastic rationality and revealed stochastic preference. Chipman JS, McFadden D, Richter MK, eds. Preferences, Uncertainty, and Optimality: Essays in Honor of Leo Hurwicz (Westview Press, Boulder, CO), 203–217.Google Scholar
- (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econometrics 15(5):447–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) On theoretical and empirical aspects of marginal distribution choice models. Management Sci. 60(6):1511–1531.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Persistency model and its applications in choice modeling. Management Sci. 55(3):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
- (1975) The analysis of permutations. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Statist. 24(2):193–202.Google Scholar
- (2024) JD.com: Transaction-level data for the 2020 MSOM data driven research challenge. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(1):2–10.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Enhancing discrete choice models with representation learning. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 140:236–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) The value of robust assortment optimization under ranking-based choice models. Management Sci. 71(5):4246–4265.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) A unified analysis for assortment planning with multi-purchase using marginal distribution models. Preprint, submitted July 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3638783.Google Scholar
- (2023) Semi-discrete optimal transport: Hardness, regularization and numerical solution. Math. Programming 199:1033–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1927) A law of comparative judgment. Psych. Rev. 34(4):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Deep neural networks for choice analysis: Extracting complete economic information for interpretation. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 118:102701.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) A representative consumer model in data-driven multi-product pricing optimization. Management Sci. 68(8):5798–5827.Link, Google Scholar

