A Simple Approach for Measuring Higher-Order Arrow-Pratt Coefficients of Risk Aversion

References

• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2006) Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experiment. Econom. 9(4):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K (1971) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Markham Publishing, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Schlesinger H, van de Kuilen G (2017) Measuring higher order ambiguity preferences. Experiment. Econom. 21(1):233–256.Google Scholar
• Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9(3):226–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker CK, Ert E, Trautmann ST, van de Kuilen G (2021) Experiencing risk: Higher-order risk attitudes in description- and experience-based decisions. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 47(5):727–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, van Bruggen P (2022) The reflection effect for higher-order risk preferences. Rev. Econom. Statist. 104(4):705–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliss RR, Panigirtzoglou N (2004) Option-implied risk aversion estimates. J. Finance 59(1):407–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caballé J, Pomansky A (1996) Mixed risk aversion. J. Econom. Theory 71(2):485–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiu WH (2005) Skewness preference, risk aversion, and the precedence relations on stochastic changes. Management Sci. 51(12):1816–1828.Link, Google Scholar
• Chiu WH, Eeckhoudt L, Rey B (2012) On relative and partial risk attitudes: Theory and implications. Econom. Theory 50(1):151–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox J, Sadiraj V, Schmidt U (2015) Paradoxes and mechanisms for choice under risk. Experiment. Econom. 18(2):215–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crainich D, Eeckhoudt L (2008) On the intensity of downside risk aversion. J. Risk Uncertainty 36(3):267–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crainich D, Eeckhoudt L, Trannoy A (2013) Even (mixed) risk lovers are prudent. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1529–1535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dave C, Eckel C, Johnson C, Rojas C (2010) Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? J. Risk Uncertainty 41(3):219–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deck C, Schlesinger H (2010) Exploring higher order risk effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(4):1403–1420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deck C, Schlesinger H (2014) Consistency of higher order risk preferences. Econometrica 82(5):1913–1943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deck C, Schlesinger H (2018) On the robustness of higher order risk preferences. J. Risk Insurance 85(2):313–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denuit MM, Eeckhoudt L (2010) A general index of absolute risk attitude. Management Sci. 56(4):712–715.Link, Google Scholar
• Dynan KE (1993) How prudent are consumers? J. Political Econom. 101(6):1104–1113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert S, Wiesen D (2014) Joint measurement of risk aversion, prudence, and temperance. J. Risk Uncertainty 48(3):231–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Schlesinger H (2006) Putting risk in its proper place. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):280–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Schlesinger H (2008) Changes in risk and the demand for saving. J. Monetary Econom. 55(7):1329–1336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Etner J, Schroyen F (2009a) The values of relative risk aversion and prudence: A context-free interpretation. Math. Soc. Sci. 58(1):1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C, Schlesinger H (1996) Changes in background risk and risk taking behavior. Econometrica 64(3):683–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Schlesinger H, Tsetlin I (2009b) Apportioning of risks via stochastic dominance. J. Econom. Theory 144(3):994–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhauer JG, Ventura L (2003) Survey measures of risk aversion and prudence. Appl. Econom. 35(13):1477–1484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esö P, White L (2004) Precautionary bidding in auctions. Econometrica 72(1):77–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filippin A, Crosetto P (2016) A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. Management Sci. 62(11):3138–3160.Link, Google Scholar
• Gollier C (2001) Wealth inequality and asset pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 68(1):181–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C (2018) Stochastic volatility implies fourth-degree risk dominance: Applications to asset pricing. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 95:155–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C, Pratt JW (1996) Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica 64(5):1109–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gourinchas PO, Parker JA (2002) Consumption over the life cycle. Econometrica 70(1):47–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Jappelli T, Terlizzese D (1996) Income risk, borrowing constraints, and portfolio choice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(1):158–172.Google Scholar
• Haering A, Heinrich T, Mayrhofer T (2020) Exploring the consistency of higher order risk preferences. Internat. Econom. Rev. 61(1):283–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, Rutström EE (2008) Risk aversion in the laboratory. Cox JC, Harrison GW, eds. Risk Aversion in Experiments. Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 12 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 41–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson S, Petrie R (2009) Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us? J. Risk Uncertainty 38(2):143–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jewitt I (1989) Choosing between risky prospects: The characterization of comparative statics results, and location independent risk. Management Sci. 35(1):60–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Jindapon P, Neilson WS (2007) Higher-order generalizations of Arrow–Pratt and Ross risk aversion: A comparative statics approach. J. Econom. Theory 136(1):719–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimball MS (1990) Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica 58(1):53–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimball MS (1992) Precautionary motives for holding assets. Newman P, Milgate M, Eatwell J, eds. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance, vol. 3 (The Macmillan Press Limited, London), 158–161.Google Scholar
• Kimball MS (1993) Standard risk aversion. Econometrica 61(3):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menezes C, Geiss C, Tressler J (1980) Increasing downside risk. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(5):921–932.Google Scholar
• Noussair CN, Trautmann ST, Van de Kuilen G (2014) Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(1):325–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the large and in the small. Econometrica 32(1):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1970) Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econom. Theory 2(3):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider SO, Sutter M (2020) Higher order risk preferences: New measures, determinants and field behavior. IZA Discussion Paper No. 13646, Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Schneider SO, Ibanez M, Riener G (2024) Measuring utility: An application to higher order risk preferences. Working paper, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Camerer CF, Nguyen Q (2010) Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):557–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautmann S, van de Kuilen G (2018) Higher order risk attitudes: A review of experimental evidence. Eur. Econom. Rev. 103:108–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White L (2008) Prudence in bargaining: The effect of uncertainty on bargaining outcomes. Games Econom. Behav. 62(1):211–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu CW, Zhang JY, Zuo SX (2021) Multiple switching and data quality in the multiple price list. Rev. Econom. Statist. 103(1):136–150.Crossref, Google Scholar