Gender and Preferences for Performance Feedback

References

• Alston M (2019) The (perceived) cost of being female: An experimental investigation of strategic responses to discrimination. Working paper, Department of Economics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
• Araujo FA, Carbone E, Conell-Price L, Dunietz MW, Jaroszewicz A, Landsman R, Lame D, Vesterlund L, Wang SW, Wilson AJ (2016) The slider task: An example of restricted inference on incentive effects. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 2:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Blatt R, VandeWalle D (2003) Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. J. Management 29(6):773–799.Google Scholar
• Barron K, Gravert C (2022) Confidence and career choices: An experiment. Scandinavian J. Econom. 124(1):35–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou R, Tirole J (2016) Mindful economics: The production, consumption, and value of beliefs. J. Econom. Perspect. 30(3):141–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, McGinn KL (2005) Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):951–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown R, Mansour H, O’Connell SD, Reeves J (2019) Gender differences in political career progression: Evidence from U.S. elections. Discussion Paper No. 12569, Institute of Labor Economics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Burks SV, Carpenter JP, Goette L, Rustichini A (2013) Overconfidence and social signalling. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(3):949–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Yuan H (2019) Do women give up competing more easily? Evidence from the laboratory and the Dutch Math Olympiad. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 11(3):225–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2014) Gender, competitiveness, and career choices. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1409–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplin A, Eliaz K (2003) AIDS policy and psychology: A mechanism-design approach. RAND J. Econom. 34(4):631–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castagnetti A, Schmacker R (2022) Protecting the ego: Motivated information selection and updating. Eur. Econom. Rev. 142:104007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman K (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Klinowski D (2020a) A study of feedback aversion. Accessed January 2024, https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/5990/history/70240.Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Klinowski D (2020b) A study of feedback aversion on a job interview task. Accessed January 2024, https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/6735/history/79497.Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Klinowski D (2022) Beliefs about receiving feedback. Accessed January 2024, https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.10413-1.0.Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Collis M, Kulkarni L (2023a) Stereotypes and belief updating. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 22(3):1011–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Flikkema CB, Shurchkov O (2021) Gender stereotypes in deliberation and team decisions. Games Econom. Behav. 129:329–349.Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Ugalde Araya P, Zafar B (2023b) A (dynamic) investigation of stereotypes, belief-updating, and behavior. NBER Working Paper No. 29382, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Coutts A (2019) Good news and bad news are still news: Experimental evidence on belief updating. Experiment. Econom. 22(2):369–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danz D, Vesterlund L, Wilson AJ (2022) Belief elicitation and behavioral incentive compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(9):2851–2883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dargnies M-P, Hakimov R, Kübler D (2019) Self-confidence and unraveling in matching markets. Management Sci. 65(12):5603–5618.Link, Google Scholar
• De Quidt J, Vesterlund L, Wilson AJ (2019) Experimenter demand effects. Schram A, Ule A, eds. The Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dupas P, Modestino AS, Niederle M, Wolfers J (2021) Gender and the dynamics of economics seminars. NBER Working Paper No. W28494, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Eil D, Rao JM (2011) The good news-bad news effect: Asymmetric processing of objective information about yourself. Am. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(2):114–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliaz K, Spiegler R (2006) Can anticipatory feelings explain anomalous choices of information sources? Games Econom. Behav. 56:87–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Swanson A (2023) Dynamics of the gender gap in high math achievement. J. Human Resources 58(5):1679–1711.Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Kessler JB (2022) The gender gap in self-promotion. Quart. J. Econom. 137(3):1345–1381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Nielsen K (2024) The gender gap in confidence: Expected but not accounted for. Amer. Econom. Rev. 114(3):851–885.Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Fisman R, Kessler JB, Lepage LP, Li X, Low C, Shan X, Toma M, Zafar B (2024) Information-optional policies and the gender concealment gap. NBER Working Paper No. 32350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Peter G (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(2):77–83.Google Scholar
• Fang C, Zhang E, Zhang J (2021) Do women give up competing more easily? Evidence from speedcubers. Econom. Lett. 205:109943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallen Y, Wasserman M (2022) Informed choices: Gender gaps in career advice. Working paper, IZA - Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Ganguly A, Tasoff J (2017) Fantasy and dread: The demand for information and the consumption utility of the future. Management Sci. 63(12):4037–4060.Link, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse V (2014) Gender differences and dynamics in competition: The role of luck. Quant. Econ. 5(2):351–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golman R, Hagmann D, Loewenstein G (2017) Information avoidance. J. Econom. Lit. 55(1):96–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golman R, Loewenstein G, Molnar A, Saccardo S (2022) The demand for, and avoidance of, information. Management Sci. 68(9):6454–6476.Link, Google Scholar
• Grosse ND, Reiner G (2010) Explaining gender gaps in competitiveness: Gender-task stereotypes. Jena Economic Research Papers No. 2010017, Friedrich Schiller University, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
• Healy PJ, Kagel J (2022) Testing elicitation mechanisms via team chat. Working paper, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
• Kang L, Lei Z, Song Y, Zhang P (2024) Gender differences in reactions to failure in high-stakes competition: Evidence from the national college entrance exam retakes. J. Political Econom. Microeconomics 2(2):355–397.Google Scholar
• Karlsson N, Loewenstein G, Seppi D (2009) The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information. J. Risk Uncertainty 38(2):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klinowski D (2019) Selection into self-improvement and competition pay: Gender, stereotypes, and earnings volatility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 158:128–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klinowski D, Paulsen JS (2013) Impaired awareness in Huntington disease: Medical evidence in relation to the optimal expectations model. Working paper, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
• Köszegi B (2006) Ego utility, overconfidence, and task choice. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 4(4):673–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masatlioglu Y, Orhun AY, Raymond C (2023) Intrinsic information preferences and skewness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 113(10):2615–2644.Google Scholar
• Möbius MM, Niederle M, Niehaus P, Rosenblat TS (2022) Managing self-confidence: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci. 68(11):7793–7817.Link, Google Scholar
• Molnar A, Loewenstein G (2022) Thoughts and players: An introduction to old and new economic perspectives on beliefs. Musolino J, Sommer J, Hemmer P, eds. The Cognitive Science of Belief: A Multidisciplinary Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 321–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murad Z, Stavropoulou C, Cookson G (2019) Incentives and gender in a multi-task setting: An experimental study with real-effort tasks. PLoS One 14(3):e0213080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E, Shoulson I, Dorsey ER (2013) Optimal expectations and limited medical testing: Evidence from Huntington disease. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(2):804–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pereda P, Montoya Diaz MD, Rocha F, Matsunaga L, Borges BP, Mena-Chalco J, Narita R, Brenck C (2023) Are women less persistent? Evidence from submissions to a nationwide meeting of economics. Appl. Econom. 55(16):1757–1768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schünemann J, Strulik H, Trimborn T (2023) Anticipation of deteriorating health and information avoidance. J. Health Econom. 89:102755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweizer N, Szech N (2018) Optimal revelation of life-changing information. Management Sci. 64(11):5250–5262.Link, Google Scholar
• Sharma K, Castagnetti A (2023) Demand for information by gender: An experimental study. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 207:172–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shastry GK, Shurchkov O, Xia LL (2020) Luck or skill: How women and men react to noisy feedback. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 88:101592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shurchkov O (2012) Under pressure: Gender differences in output quality and quantity under competition and time constraints. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 10(5):1189–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sicherman N, Loewenstein G, Seppi DJ, Utkus SP (2016) Financial attention. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(4):863–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone D, Heen S (2014) Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving Feedback Well (Penguin Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Thornton RL (2008) The demand for, and impact of, learning HIV status. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):1829–1863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman M (2023) Gender differences in politician persistence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 105(2):275–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberg BA (2009) A model of overconfidence. Pacific Econom. Rev. 14(4):502–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmermann F (2020) The dynamics of motivated beliefs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(2):337–363.Crossref, Google Scholar