Competition Avoidance vs. Herding in Job Search: Evidence from Large-Scale Field Experiments on an Online Job Board

References

• Abaluck J, Compiani G (2020) A method to estimate discrete choice models that is robust to consumer search. NBER Working Paper No. 26849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Albrecht J, Decreuse B, Vroman S (2023) Directed search with phantom vacancies. Internat. Econom. Rev. 64(2):837–869.Google Scholar
• Azar J, Berry S, Marinescu IE (2019) Estimating labor market power. Preprint, submitted September 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3456277.Google Scholar
• Azevedo EM, Deng A, Montiel Olea JL, Rao J, Weyl EG (2020) A/B testing with fat tails. J. Political Econom. 128(12):4614–4672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker SR, Fradkin A (2017) The impact of unemployment insurance on job search: Evidence from Google search data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(5):756–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Eckles D, Bernstein MS (2014) Designing and deploying online field experiments. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 283–292.Google Scholar
• Banfi S, Villena-Roldán B (2019) Do high-wage jobs attract more applicants? Directed search evidence from the online labor market. J. Labor Econom. 37(3):715–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belot M, Kircher P, Muller P (2022) How wage announcements affect job search—A field experiment. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 14(4):1–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Fonseca Y, Lobel I, Zheng F (2023) Signaling competition in two-sided markets. Preprint, submitted May 17, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4451693.Google Scholar
• Branco F, Sun M, Villas-Boas JM (2012) Optimal search for product information. Management Sci. 58(11):2037–2056.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheron A, Decreuse B (2017) Matching with phantoms. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(3):1041–1070.Google Scholar
• Coffman LC, Featherstone CR, Kessler JB (2017) Can social information affect what job you choose and keep? Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(1):96–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortés P, Pan J, Pilossoph L, Zafar B (2023) Gender differences in job search and the earnings gap: Evidence from the field and lab. Quart. J. Econom. 138(4):2069–2126.Google Scholar
• Faberman RJ, Kudlyak M (2019) The intensity of job search and search duration. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 11(3):327–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong J (2024) Effects of market size and competition in two-sided markets: Evidence from online dating. Marketing Sci. 43(5):971–985.Google Scholar
• Fradkin A (2017) Search, matching, and the role of digital marketplace design in enabling trade: Evidence from Airbnb. Preprint, submitted March 21, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2939084.Google Scholar
• Gardete PM, Hunter M (2024) Multiattribute search: Empirical evidence and information design. Marketing Sci. 43(5):1052–1080.Google Scholar
• Gee LK (2018) The more you know: Information effects in job application rates in a large field experiment. Management Sci. 65(5):2077–2094.Google Scholar
• Gee LK, Jones J, Burke M (2017) Social networks and labor markets: How strong ties relate to job finding on Facebook’s social network. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):485–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hensvik L, Barbanchon TL, Rathelot R (2020) Do algorithmic job recommendations improve search and matching? Evidence from a large-scale randomised field experiment in Sweden.Google Scholar
• Hodgson C, Lewis G (2025) You can lead a horse to water: Spatial learning and path dependence in consumer search. Econometrica. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2017) The effects of algorithmic labor market recommendations: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):345–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibañez M, Riener G (2018) Sorting through affirmative action: Three field experiments in Colombia. J. Labor Econom. 36(2):437–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karrer B, Shi L, Bhole M, Goldman M, Palmer T, Gelman C, Konutgan M, Sun F (2021) Network experimentation at scale. Proc. 27th ACM SIGKDD Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 3106–3116.Google Scholar
• Kohavi R, Tang D, Xu Y (2020) Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments: A Practical Guide to A/B Testing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroft K, Pope DG (2014) Does online search crowd out traditional search and improve matching efficiency? Evidence from Craigslist. J. Labor Econom. 32(2):259–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn P, Mansour H (2014) Is internet job search still ineffective? Econom. J. 124(581):1213–1233.Google Scholar
• Kuhn P, Shen K, Zhang S (2020) Gender-targeted job ads in the recruitment process: Facts from a Chinese job board. J. Development Econom. 147:102531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Barbanchon T, Hensvik L, Rathelot R (2023) How can AI improve search and matching? Evidence from 59 million personalized job recommendations. Preprint, submitted July 24, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4604814.Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt A, List JA (2025) Do equal employment opportunity statements encourage racial minorities? Evidence from a large natural field experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 104987.Google Scholar
• Marinescu I (2019) The general equilibrium impacts of unemployment insurance: Evidence from a large online job board. J. Public Econom. 171:70–85.Google Scholar
• Marinescu I, Skandalis D (2021) Unemployment insurance and job search behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 136(2):887–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennycook G, Bear A, Collins ET, Rand DG (2020) The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management Sci. 66(11):4944–4957.Link, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samek A (2019) Gender differences in job entry decisions: A university-wide field experiment. Management Sci. 65(7):3272–3281.Link, Google Scholar
• Skandalis D (2018) Breaking news: Information about firms’ hiring needs affects the direction of job search. Working paper, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2010) Growing two-sided networks by advertising the user base: A field experiment. Marketing Sci. 29(5):805–814.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Rijt A, Kang SM, Restivo M, Patil A (2014) Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(19):6934–6939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Ours J, Ridder G (1992) Vacancies and the recruitment of new employees. J. Labor Econom. 10(2):138–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Veldhuizen R (2022) Gender differences in tournament choices: Risk preferences, overconfidence, or competitiveness? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 20(4):1595–1618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward G (2022) Workplace happiness and job search behavior: Evidence from a field experiment. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper No. 6607-22, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Wright R, Kircher P, Julien B, Guerrieri V (2021) Directed search and competitive search equilibrium: A guided tour. J. Econom. Literature 59(1):90–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar