Backup Plans: The Impact of Disclosure on Perceptions of Expert Competence

References

• Agnew JR, Bateman H, Eckert C, Iskhakov F, Louviere J, Thorp S (2018) First impressions matter: An experimental investigation of online financial advice. Management Sci. 64(1):288–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Alquist JL, Baumeister RF (2023) Dealing with uncertain situations. J. Positive Psych. 19(6):923–946.Google Scholar
• Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D, Kring AM (2001) Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(1):116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker TL, Meyer T, Johnson JD (2008) Individual differences in perceptions of service failure and recovery: The role of race and discriminatory bias. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(4):552–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J, Hershey JC (1988) Outcome bias in decision evaluation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(4):569–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.Google Scholar
• Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. 25(3):187–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitner MJ (1990) Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. J. Marketing 54(2):69–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonaccio S, Dalal RS (2006) Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2):127–151.Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Gino F, Schweitzer ME (2015) Smart people ask for (my) advice: Seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Management Sci. 61(6):1421–1435.Link, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang K, Abi-Esber N, Buell RW, Huang L, Hall B (2019) Mitigating malicious envy: Why successful individuals should reveal their failures. J. Experiment. Psych. General 148(4):667–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JJ, Reingen PH (1987) Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. J. Consumer Res. 14(3):350–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Critcher CR, Inbar Y, Pizarro DA (2013) How quick decisions illuminate moral character. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):308–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Matos CA, Henrique JL, Alberto Vargas Rossi C (2007) Service recovery paradox: A meta-analysis. J. Service Res. 10(1):60–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efendić E, Van de Calseyde PPFM, Evans AM (2020) Slow response times undermine trust in algorithmic (but not human) predictions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 157(March):103–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaertig C, Simmons JP (2023) Are people more or less likely to follow advice that is accompanied by a confidence interval? J. Experiment. Psych. General 152(7):2008–2025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM (1999) Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. Amer. Psychologist 54(7):493–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM, Brandstätter V (1997) Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(1):186–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Fukutomi GD (1991) The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Acad. Management Rev. 16(4):719–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Hess RL, Ganesan S, Klein NM (2003) Service failure and recovery: The impact of relationship factors on customer satisfaction. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 31(2):127–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Lei Z, Grant A (2009) Seeking help in the shadow of doubt: The sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1261–1274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang S, Zhang Y (2013) All roads lead to Rome: The impact of multiple attainment means on motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(2):236–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hur JD, Ruttan RL, Shea CT (2020) The unexpected power of positivity: Predictions versus decisions about advisor selection. J. Experiment. Psych. General 149(10):1969–1986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis IL (1972) Victims of Groupthink (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Ji LJ, Zhang N, Li Y, Zhang Z, Harper G, Khei M, Li J (2017) Cultural variations in reasons for advice seeking. Behavioral Decision Making 30(3):708–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psych. Rev. 80(4):237–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krosnick JA, Petty RE (2014) Attitude strength: An overview. Petty RE, Krosnick JA, eds. Attitude Strength (Psychology Press, New York), 1–24.Google Scholar
• List JA (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):41–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCollough MA, Bharadwaj SG (1992) The recovery paradox: An examination of consumer satisfaction in relation to disconfirmation, service quality, and attribution based theories. Allen CT, Madden TJ, eds. Marketing Theory and Applications, vol. 119 (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 102–107.Google Scholar
• Napolitano C, Freund A (2017) First evidence for “the backup plan paradox.” J. Experiment. Psych. General 146(8):1189–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth CJ (1986) Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psych. Rev. 93(1):23–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmeira M (2020) Advice in the presence of external cues: The impact of conflicting judgments on perceptions of expertise. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 156(January):82–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmeira M, Spassova G (2024) Consulting multiple advisors: When it hurts and when it does not hurt the advisor–advisee relationship? J. Behav. Decision Making 37(2):e2382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters E, Klein W, Kaufman A, Meilleur L, Dixon A (2013) More is not always better: Intuitions about effective public policy can lead to unintended consequences. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 7(1):114–148.Google Scholar
• Phillips JG, Landon J (2016) Dynamic changes in the use of online advice in response to task success or failure. Behav. Inform. Tech. 35(10):796–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R (2017) Meaningful mediation analysis: Plausible causal inference and informative communication. J. Consumer Res. 44(3):692–716.Google Scholar
• Polman E, Maglio SJ (2023) Improving the generalizability of behavioral science by using reality checks: A tool for assessing heterogeneity in participants’ consumership of study stimuli. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 18(4):955–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polman E, Ruttan RL (2022) Making utilitarian choices but giving deontological advice. J. Experiment. Psych. General 151(10):2614–2621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price PC, Stone ER (2004) Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: Evidence for a confidence heuristic. Behav. Decision Making 17(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price LL, Arnould EJ, Tierney P (1995) Going to extremes: Managing service encounters and assessing provider performance. J. Marketing 59(2):83–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rader CA, Larrick RP, Soll JB (2017) Advice as a form of social influence: Informational motives and the consequences for accuracy. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 11(8):e12329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rader CA, Soll JB, Larrick RP (2015) Pushing away from representative advice: Advice taking, anchoring, and adjustment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 130(September):26–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (1978) Conformity, group-oriented motivation, and status attainment in small groups. Soc. Psych. 41(3):175–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rifkin JR, Du KM, Cutright KM (2023) The preference for spontaneity in entertainment. J. Consumer Res. 50(3):597–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sah S, Moore DA, MacCoun RJ (2013) Cheap talk and credibility: The consequences of confidence and accuracy on advisor credibility and persuasiveness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121(2):246–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaerer M, Tost LP, Huang L, Gino F, Larrick R (2018) Advice giving: A subtle pathway to power. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 44(5):746–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• See KE, Morrison EW, Rothman NB, Soll JB (2011) The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):272–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharif MA, Shu SB (2017) The benefits of emergency reserves: Greater preference and persistence for goals that have slack with a cost. J. Marketing Res. 54(3):495–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin J, Milkman KL (2016) How backup plans can harm goal pursuit: The unexpected downside of being prepared for failure. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 135(July):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith AK, Bolton RN, Wagner J (1999) A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. J. Marketing Res. 36(3):356–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sniezek JA, Van Swol LM (2001) Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 84(2):288–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soll JB, Palley AB, Rader CA (2022) The bad thing about good advice: Understanding when and how advice exacerbates overconfidence. Management Sci. 68(4):2949–2969.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun J, Keh HT, Lee AY (2012) The effect of attribute alignability on service evaluation: The moderating role of uncertainty. J. Consumer Res. 39(4):831–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenney ER, Spellman BA, MacCoun RJ (2008) The benefits of knowing what you know (and what you don’t): How calibration affects credibility. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 44(5):1368–1375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenney ER, MacCoun RJ, Spellman BA, Hastie R (2007) Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility. Psych. Sci. 18(1):46–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Calseyde PPFM, Keren G, Zeelenberg M (2014) Decision time as information in judgment and choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125(2):113–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vredenburg J, Bell SJ, Polman E (2023) Employee-to-customer improvisation: A value creation strategy for navigating the contemporary consumption experience. Bäckström K, Egan-Wyer C, Samsioe E, eds. The Future of Consumption: How Technology, Sustainability and Wellbeing Will Transform Retail and Customer Experience (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland), 323–343.Google Scholar
• Walters DJ, Ülkümen G, Tannenbaum D, Erner C, Fox CR (2023) Investor behavior under epistemic vs. aleatory uncertainty. Management Sci. 69(5):2761–2777.Link, Google Scholar
• Wan LC, Wyer RS (2019) The influence of incidental similarity on observers’ causal attributions and reactions to a service failure. J. Consumer Res. 45(6):1350–1368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wan LC, Hui MK, Wyer RS Jr (2011) The role of relationship norms in responses to service failures. J. Consumer Res. 38(2):260–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yalch RF, Elmore-Yalch R (1984) The effect of numbers on the route to persuasion. J. Consumer Res. 11(1):522–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeung CWM, Soman D (2007) The duration heuristic. J. Consumer Res. 34(3):315–326.Crossref, Google Scholar