Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Two-Sided Markets

References

• Adachi T (2005) Third-degree price discrimination, consumption externalities and social welfare. Economica 72(285):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguirre I, Cowan S, Vickers J (2010) Monopoly price discrimination and demand curvature. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1601–1615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Peitz M (2021) The Economics of Platforms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Peitz M (2024) Network goods, price discrimination, and two-sided platforms. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Benzell S, Collis A (2022) Regulating digital platform monopolies: The case of Facebook. Preprint, submitted February 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3619535.Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Brooks B, Morris S (2015) The limits of price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(3):921–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Wang K, Zhang X (2022) Fending off critics of platform power with differential revenue sharing: Doing well by doing good? Management Sci. 68(11):8249–8260.Link, Google Scholar
• Bisceglia M, Tirole J (2023) Fair gatekeeping in digital ecosystems. TSE Working Paper 23-1452, Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
• Böhme E (2016) Second-degree price discrimination on two-sided markets. Rev. Network Econom. 15(2):91–115.Google Scholar
• Borck J, Caminade J, von Wartburg M (2020) Apple’s app store and other digital marketplaces. Technical report, Analysis Group, Boston.Google Scholar
• Bouvard M, Casamatta C, Xiong R (2022) Lending and monitoring: Big tech vs banks. TSE Working Paper 22-1386, Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
• Carroni E, Madio L, Shekhar S (2024) Superstars in two-sided markets: Exclusives or not? Management Sci. 70(2):991–1011.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Winston C, Yan J (2022) Does Uber benefit travelers by price discrimination? J. Law Econom. 65(S2):S433–S459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan S (2016) Welfare-increasing third-degree price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. 47(2):326–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Annunzio A, Russo A (2024) Platform transaction taxes and freemium pricing. Preprint, submitted January 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4699316.Google Scholar
• Ding R, Wright J (2017) Payment card interchange fees and price discrimination. J. Indust. Econom. 65(1):39–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambacorta L, Madio L, Parigi BM (2023) Platform lending and innovation. Preprint, submitted November 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4321030.Google Scholar
• Gomes R, Mantovani A (2024) Regulating platform fees under price parity. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc., corrected proof March 13, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvae014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes R, Pavan A (2016) Many-to-many matching and price discrimination. Theoret. Econom. 11(3):1005–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hashizume R, Ikeda T, Nariu T (2021) Pareto improving third-degree price discrimination with network effects. Institute of Economic Research Faculty of Economics Discussion Paper No. 21-1, Daito Bunka University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, MacKie-Mason JK (1988) Price discrimination and patent policy. RAND J. Econom. 19(2):253–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeon D-S, Kim B-C, Menicucci D (2022) Second-degree price discrimination by a two-sided monopoly platform. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 14(2):322–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jullien B, Pavan A, Rysman M (2021) Two-sided markets, pricing, and network effects. Ho K, Hortaçsu A, Lizzeri A, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 485–592.Google Scholar
• Lin S (2020) Two-sided price discrimination by media platforms. Marketing Sci. 39(2):317–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Serfes K (2013) Price discrimination in two-sided markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy 22(4):768–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahata B, Ostaszewski K, Sahoo PK (1990) Direction of price changes in third-degree price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(5):1254–1258.Google Scholar
• Peitz M, Reisinger M (2022) Platforms under joint ownership. Presentation, Workshop “Regulating the Digital Economy,” May 13, Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
• Pigou AC (1920) The Economics of Welfare (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Reisinger M (2014) Two-part tariff competition between two-sided platforms. Eur. Econom. Rev. 68:168–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson J (1933) The Economics of Imperfect Competition (Macmillan and Company, London).Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 23(3):125–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1981) Output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(1):242–247.Google Scholar
• Shekhar S (2021) Platform pricing choice: Exclusive deals or uniform prices. Rev. Network Econom. 20(3):159–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tremblay MJ (2021) The limits of marketplace fee discrimination. CESifo Working Paper No. 9440, CESifo GmbH, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1985) Price discrimination and social welfare. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(4):870–875.Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wright J (2017) Ad valorem platform fees, indirect taxes, and efficient price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. 48(2):467–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wright J (2022) Regulating platform fees. Working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Weyl EG (2006) The price theory of two-sided markets. Accessed May 27, 2024, https://pseweb.eu/ydepot/semin/texte0607/WEY2006PRI.pdf#page=21.46.Google Scholar
• Weyl EG (2010) A price theory of multi-sided platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1642–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar