Getting Down to Business: Chain Ownership and Fertility Clinic Performance
References
- (2010) Is meaningful reporting of national IVF outcome data possible? Human Reproduction 25(1):9–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2016) Perinatal risks associated with assisted reproductive technology. Report, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2020) Preimplantation genetic testing. Obstetrics Gynecology 135(3):e133–e137.Crossref, Google Scholar
- American Medical Association (2019) Report 11 of the Council on Medical Service (A-19). Report, American Medical Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
- American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2013) Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: A committee opinion. Fertility Sterility 99(1):44–46.Google Scholar
- American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2017) Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: A committee opinion. Fertility Sterility 107(4):901–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Andreyeva E, Gupta A, Ishitani C, Sylwestrzak M, Ukert B (2024) The corporatization of independent hospitals. J. Political Econom. Microeconomics 2(3).Google Scholar
- (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(5):941–973.Google Scholar
- (2014) Vertical integration: Hospital ownership of physician practices is associated with higher prices and spending. Health Affairs 33(5):756–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Financial Econom. 144(2):370–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Factors associated with early in vitro fertilization treatment discontinuation. Fertility Sterility 112(1):105–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The operational consequences of private equity buyouts: Evidence from the restaurant industry. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(9):2387–2418.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Utilization of infertility treatments: The effects of insurance mandates. Demography 49(1):125–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Bleiberg J (2021) STACKEDEV: Stata module to implement stacked event study estimator. Statistical Software Components S459027, Boston College Department of Economics, Chestnut Hill, MA.Google Scholar
- (2012) Americans do it better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Healthy business? Managerial education and management in health care. Rev. Econom. Statist. 102(3):506–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Prevalence and performance of private equity-affiliated fertility practices in the United States. Fertility Sterility 117(1):124–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Evaluating trends in private equity ownership and impacts on health outcomes, costs, and quality: Systematic review. British Medical J. 382:e075244.Google Scholar
- (2011) Growth LBOs. J. Financial Econom. 102(2):432–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Association of private equity investment in US nursing homes with the quality and cost of care for long-stay residents. JAMA Health Forum 2:e213817.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Equilibrium effects of health care price information. Rev. Econom. Statist 101(4):699–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Do markets respond to quality information? The case of fertility clinics. J. Health Econom. 28(3):718–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Tech companies get high marks for covering infertility treatments. New York Times (November 15), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/your-money/infertility-treatment-coverage.html.Google Scholar
- Cengiz D, Dube A, Lindner A, Zipperer B (2019) The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1405–1454.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023) Infertility FAQs. Accessed May 15, 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/reproductive-health/infertility-faq/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/infertility/index.htm#.Google Scholar
- (2009) The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: A review of selected developed countries. Fertility Sterility 91(6):2281–2294.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Infertility service use in the United States: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010. Natl. Health Statist. Rep. 73:1–21.Google Scholar
- (2022) Antitrust authorities take aim at private-equity healthcare deals. Wall Street Journal (June 14), https://www.wsj.com/articles/antitrust-authorities-take-aim-at-private-equity-healthcare-deals-11655243804.Google Scholar
- (2018) Matching and regression to the mean in difference-in-differences analysis. Health Services Res. 53(6):4138–4156.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Do mergers and acquisitions improve efficiency: Evidence from power plants. NBER Working Paper No. 32727, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2023) Verlinvest picks up controlling stake in fertility chain Ferty9. Economic Times (April 19), https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/verlinvest-picks-up-controlling-stake-in-fertility-chain-ferty9/articleshow/99594398.cms?from=mdr.Google Scholar
- (2021) New survey finds employers adding fertility benefits to promote DEI. Mercer (May 6), https://www.mercer.us/our-thinking/healthcare/new-survey-finds-employers-adding-fertility-benefits-to-promote-dei.html.Google Scholar
- (2010) Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. J. Econom. Lit. 48(4):935–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Monopolistic competition when price and quality are imperfectly observable. RAND J. Econom. 23(4):518–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Dresner Partners (2018) The continuing consolidation of the fertility sector. Report, Dresner Partners, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (2020) How acquisitions affect firm behavior and performance: Evidence from the dialysis industry. Quart. J. Econom. 135(1):221–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) A demographic projection of the contribution of assisted reproductive technologies to world population growth. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 36(4):455–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) IVF—In vitro fertilization: Costs of IVF. Accessed December 12, https://www.fertilityiq.com/ivf-in-vitro-fertilization/costs-of-ivf#what-is-the-total-cost-of-ivf.Google Scholar
- (2022) Deputy assistant attorney general Andrew Forman delivers keynote at the ABA’s antitrust in healthcare conference: The importance of vigorous antitrust enforcement in health care. (June 3), https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-assistant-attorney-general-andrew-forman-delivers-keynote-abas-antitrust.Google Scholar
- (2006) Market selection, reallocation, and restructuring in the U.S. retail trade sector in the 1990s. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):748–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Barbarians at the store? Private equity, products, and consumers. J. Finance 77(3):1439–1488.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) High-tech pregnancies test hope’s limit. New York Times (January 7), https://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/07/us/high-tech-pregnancies-test-hope-s-limit.html.Google Scholar
- (2021) Disparities in access to fertility care: Who’s in and who’s out. Fertility Sterility Rep. 2(1):109–117.Google Scholar
- (2017) Relational knowledge transfers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(9):2695–2730.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Competition and quality in health care markets. Foundations Trends Microeconom. 2(6):441–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) What to do about health-care markets? Policies to make health-care markets work. The Hamilton Project. Accessed December 20, 2022, https://www.hamiltonproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Gaynor_PP_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2015) The industrial organization of health-care markets. J. Econom. Lit. 53(2):235–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The power of time: The impact of free IVF on women’s human capital investments. Eur. Econom. Rev. 133:103645.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) A new way to estimate the potential unmet need for infertility services among women in the United States. J. Women’s Health 25(2):133–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Owner incentives and performance in healthcare: Private equity investment in nursing homes. Rev. Financial Stud. 37(4):1029–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets. Health Econom. 21(8):994–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Health care access, costs, and treatment dynamics: Evidence from in vitro fertilization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(12):3725–3777.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Nurse staffing and deficiencies in the largest for-profit nursing home chains and chains owned by private equity companies. Health Services Res. 47(1):106–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: A population-based cross-sectional study. Fertility Sterility 107(4):1023–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertility Sterility 89(1):66–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The debt financing of parenthood. Law Contemporary Problems 72(3):147–175.Google Scholar
- (2018) What’s behind the surge in retail healthcare deals? Report, Bain & Company, New York.Google Scholar
- (2003) The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Quart. J. Econom. 118(2):409–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Reputational incentives for restaurant hygiene. Am. Econom. J. Microeconom. 1(1):237–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Association between hospital conversions to for-profit status and clinical and economic outcomes. JAMA 312(16):1644–1652.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Kebbon VK, Ghukasyan LT, Olovsson M, Berglund L, Brodin T, Holte J (2017) Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. Fertility Sterility 107(3):641–648.e2.Google Scholar
- (2022) Here’s how AI is helping make babies by revolutionizing IVF. Forbes (July 30), https://www.forbes.com/sites/ganeskesari/2022/06/30/heres-how-ai-is-helping-make-babies-by-revolutionizing-ivf/.Google Scholar
- (2016) Fertility treatments in the United States. Obstetrics Gynecology 128(2):387–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Much ado about chains: A research agenda. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 30(3):303–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Fertility Inc.: Inside the big business of babymaking. Fortune (January 21), https://fortune.com/longform/fertility-business-femtech-investing-ivf/.Google Scholar
- (2019) Industry voices—Fertility clinics offer big potential for investors and physician practices. Accessed December 8, 2022, https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/hospitals-health-systems/industry-voices-fertility-clinics-offer-big-potential-for-investors-and.Google Scholar
- (2009) Altruism and intermediation in the market for babies. Washington Lee Law Rev. 66:203–257.Google Scholar
- (2023) The impact of management on clinical performance: Evidence from physician practice management companies. Management Sci. 69(8):1–22.Google Scholar
- (2022) Fertility support startups banked $ 345M in 2021. Here’s why the business of family planning is booming. Accessed December 1, 2022, https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/health-tech/fertility-support-startups-banked-345m-funding-2021-heres-why-workplace-perk-becoming.Google Scholar
- (2023) On resource allocation in health care: The case of concierge medicine. J. Health Econom. 90:102776.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States. Amer. J. Obstetrics Gynecology 209(6):586.e1–586.e11.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Can differences in IVF success rates between centres be explained by patient characteristics and sample size? Human Reproduction 25(1):110–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Does nonprofit ownership matter for firm performance? Financial distress and ownership conversion of nursing homes. Management Sci. 68(7):5127–5145.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Competition and product quality in the supermarket industry. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1539–1591.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Should every embryo undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy? A review of the modern approach to in vitro fertilization. Best Practice Res. Clinical Obstetrics Gynaecology 53:38–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) IVF—In vitro fertilization: What is IVF? Accessed January 5, 2023, https://www.fertilityiq.com/ivf-in-vitro-fertilization/summary-of-the-ivf-process#what-is-ivf.Google Scholar
- (2013) Management practices and the quality of care in cardiac units. JAMA Internat. Medicine 173(8):684–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Business models and provider satisfaction in in vitro fertilization centers in the USA. J. Assisted Reproduction Genetics 36(3):283–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Chinese demand for fertility treatment spurs IVF deals. Nikkei Asia (April 7), https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Business-trends/Chinese-demand-for-fertility-treatment-spurs-IVF-deals#:∼:text=HONGKONG–Afterfour,seek more reliable%2C accessible care.Google Scholar
- (2018) Infertile couples prefer twins: Analysis of their reasons and clinical characteristics related to this preference. J. Reproduction Infertility 19(3):167–173.Google Scholar
- (2022) Embryo transfer success: It is in our hands. Fertility Sterility 118(5):815–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Why it matters which doctor performs your IVF transfer. Accessed September 12, 2022, https://www.fertilityiq.com/topics/ivf/why-it-matters-which-doctors-performs-your-ivf-transfer.Google Scholar
- (2003) Assisted reproductive technologies and the pitfalls of unregulated biomedical innovation. Florida. Law Rev. 55(2):603–665.Google Scholar
- (2022) The changing world of IVF: The pros and cons of new business models offering assisted reproductive technologies. J. Assisted Reproduction Genetics 39(2):305–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Cautious optimism from PE investors in fertility care. Axios (July 23), https://www.axios.com/2022/07/23/cautious-optimism-pe-investors-fertility-care.Google Scholar
- (2023) How major retailers are trying to change how America consumes health care. Axios (March 8), https://www.axios.com/2023/03/08/how-major-retailers-how-america-health-care.Google Scholar
- , Rodríguez Pérez T, Veiga E (2021) Single-embryo transfer: A key strategy to reduce the risk for multiple pregnancy in assisted human reproduction. Adv. Laboratory Medicine 2(2):179–188.Google Scholar
- (2017) Investors see big money in infertility. And they’re transforming the industry. STAT (December 4), https://www.statnews.com/2017/12/04/infertility-industry-investment/.Google Scholar
- (2018) World-leading fertility group acquires Danish clinic for millions. MedWatch (September 19), https://medwatch.dk/secure/Top_picks_in_english/article10873749.ece.Google Scholar
- (2022) What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. J. Econometrics 235(2):2218–2244.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Saghafian S, Song L, Newhouse JP, Landrum MB, Hsu J (2023) The impact of vertical integration on physician behavior and healthcare delivery: Evidence from gastroenterology practices. Management Sci. 69(12):7158–7179.Google Scholar
- (2007) Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility. J. Health Econom. 26(3):431–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Paving the way for a gold standard of care for infertility treatment: Improving outcomes through standardization of laboratory procedures. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 35(4):391–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The influence of male factor infertility on the progression of day-3 embryos to blastocyst: A case-control study. Fertility Sterility 82(2):S172.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Impact of patient preference on rate of double embryo transfer and resultant twin gestation. Fertility Sterility 107(3):e47–e48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) What is the value of market-wide health care price transparency? JAMA 322(15):1449–1450.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Association of private equity acquisition of physician practices with changes in health care spending and utilization. JAMA Health Forum 3(9):e222886.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2021a) What is SART? Accessed November 12, 2022, https://www.sart.org/patients/what-is-sart/.Google Scholar
- Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2021b) Success rates. Accessed January 1, 2023, https://www.sart.org/patients/a-patients-guide-to-assisted-reproductive-technology/general-information/success-rates/.Google Scholar
- (2013) Selection at the gate: Difficult cases, spillovers, and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):796–812.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) EVENTSTUDYINTERACT: Stata module to implement the interaction weighted estimator for an event study. Statistical Software Components S458978, Department of Economics, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J. Econometrics 225:175–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Effects of patient education on desire for twins and use of elective single embryo transfer procedures during ART treatment: A systematic review. Reproductive Biomedicine Soc. Online 6:102–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- The Economist (2023a) The fertility sector is booming (July 17), https://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2023/07/17/the-fertility-sector-is-booming.Google Scholar
- The Economist (2023b) In vitro fertilisation is struggling to keep up with demand (July 17), https://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2023/07/17/in-vitro-fertilisation-is-struggling-to-keep-up-with-demand.Google Scholar
- (2015) Hospital board and management practices are strongly related to hospital performance on clinical quality metrics. Health Affairs 34(8):1304–1311.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The uncertain future of human production. Accessed January 2, 2023, https://www.axios.com/2021/01/09/gene-editing-and-the-uncertain-future-of-human-reproduction.Google Scholar
- (2020) Coverage and use of fertility services in the U.S. Accessed December 9, 2022, https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/coverage-and-use-of-fertility-services-in-the-u-s/.Google Scholar
- (2016) No common denominator: A review of outcome measures in IVF RCTs. Human Reproduction 31(12):2714–2722.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The relationship between IVF clinic volume and success rates in SART reporting clinics. Fertility Sterility 116(3):E118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Winfertility (2022) We build and support families. Accessed December 9, 2022, https://www.winfertility.com.Google Scholar
- (2022) Informative predictors of pregnancy after first IVF cycle using eIVF practice highway electronic health records. Sci. Rep. 12(1):839.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Money-back guarantees and service quality: The marketing of in vitro fertilization services. J. Marketing Res. 59(3):659–673.Crossref, Google Scholar

