Platform Competition and Interoperability: The Net Fee Model

References

• Anderson SP, Coate S (2005) Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(4):947–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Peitz M (2020) Media see-saws: Winners and losers in platform markets. J. Econom. Theory 186:104990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Erkal N, Piccinin D (2020) Aggregative games and oligopoly theory: Short-run and long-run analysis. RAND J. Econom. 51(2):470–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Wright J (2007) Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Econom. Theory 32(2):353–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Calvano E, Gans JS (2018) The impact of consumer multi-homing on advertising markets and media competition. Management Sci. 64(4):1574–1590.Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Halaburda H (2020) Platform competition with multihoming on both sides: Subsidize or not? Management Sci. 66(12):5599–5607.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1991) A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. J. Political Econom. 99(5):1109–1116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2011) Dynamic price competition with network effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):83–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2019) Towards a theory of platform dynamics. Econom. Management Strategy 28(1):60–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplin AS, Nalebuff B (1991) Aggregation and imperfect competition: On the existence of equilibrium. Econometrica 59(1):25–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan LT (2024) Quality strategies in network markets. Management Sci. 70(3):1992–2002.Link, Google Scholar
• Correia-da Silva J, Jullien B, Lefouili Y, Pinho J (2019) Horizontal mergers between multisided platforms: Insights from Cournot competition. Econom. Management Strategy 28(1):109–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crémer J, de Montjoye Y-A, Schweitzer H (2019) Competition Policy for the Digital Era (Directorate-General for Competition, European Commision, Brussels).Google Scholar
• Crémer J, Rey P, Tirole J (2000) Connectivity in the commercial internet. J. Indust. Econom. 48(4):433–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dybvig PH, Spatt CS (1983) Adoption externalities as public goods. J. Public Econom. 20(2):231–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans DS (2003) The antitrust economics of two-sided markets. Yale J. Regulation 20(2):325–381.Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Klemperer P (2007) Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook Indust. Organ. 3:1967–2072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. 16(1):70–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J, Coyle D, Fletcher A, McAuley D, Marsden P (2019) Unlocking Digital Competition: Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel (UK Government Publication, HM Treasury, London).Google Scholar
• Gale D, Nikaido H (1965) The Jacobian matrix and global univalence of mappings. Math. Ann. 159(2):81–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu G, Zhu F (2021) Trust and disintermediation: Evidence from an online freelance marketplace. Management Sci. 67(2):794–807.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2006) Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):720–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jullien B, Pavan A, Rysman M (2021) Two-sided markets, pricing, and network effects. Ho K, Hortaçsu A, Lizzeri A, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 485–592.Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Klemperer PD, Meyer MA (1989) Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty. Econometrica 57(6):1243–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malueg DA, Schwartz M (2006) Compatibility incentives of a large network facing multiple rivals. J. Indust. Econom. 54(4):527–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nocke V, Schutz N (2018) Multiproduct-firm oligopoly: An aggregative games approach. Econometrica 86(2):523–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Peitz M, Sato S (2024) Asymmetric platform oligopoly. CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Ser. crctr224_2023_428v3. University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
• Reisinger M (2014) Two-part tariff competition between two-sided platforms. Eur. Econom. Rev. 68:168–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rohlfs J (1974) A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 5(1):16–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2004) Competition between networks: A study of the market for yellow pages. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):483–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott Morton F, Bouvier P, Ezrachi A, Jullien B, Katz R, Kimmelman G, Melamed AD, Morgenstern J (2019) Stigler committee on digital platforms: Market structure and antitrust subcommittee report, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, IL.Google Scholar
• Selten R (1970) Preispolitik Der Mehrproduktenunternehmung in Der Statischen Theorie, Ökonometrie und Unternehmensforschung/Econometrics and Operations Research, vol. 16 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1975) Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell J. Econom. 6(2):417–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan G, Zhou J (2021) The effects of competition and entry in multi-sided markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(2):1002–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan H, Wright J (2018) A price theory of multi-sided platforms: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(9):2758–2760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan H, Wright J (2021) Pricing distortions in multi-sided platforms. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 79:102732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teh T-H, Liu C, Wright J, Zhou J (2023) Multihoming and oligopolistic platform competition. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 15(4):68–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veiga A, Weyl EG, White A (2017) Multidimensional platform design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):191–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weyl EG (2010) A price theory of multi-sided platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1642–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White A (2022) Platform economics: Recent findings and further questions. CPI Antitrust Chronicle 2 (June — II).Google Scholar
• White A, Weyl EG (2016) Insulated platform competition. Unpublished manuscript, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.Google Scholar