Large Language Model in Creative Work: The Role of Collaboration Modality and User Expertise

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03014

References

  • Agarwal A, Mukhopadhyay T (2016) The impact of competing ads on click performance in sponsored search. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):538–557.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Akerman A, Gaarder I, Mogstad M (2015) The skill complementarity of broadband internet. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1781–1824.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnett DB, Wittmann CM (2014) Improving marketing success: The role of tacit knowledge exchange between sales and marketing. J. Bus. Res. 67(3):324–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bauer K, Gill A (2024) Mirror, mirror on the wall: Algorithmic assessments, transparency, and self-fulfilling prophecies. Inform. Systems Res. 35(1):226–248.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bauer K, von Zahn M, Hinz O (2023) Expl(AI)ned: The impact of explainable artificial intelligence on users’ information processing. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1582–1602.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berg JM (2014) The primal mark: How the beginning shapes the end in the development of creative ideas. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125(1):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boussioux L, Lane JN, Zhang M, Jacimovic V, Lakhani KR (2024) The crowdless future? Generative AI and creative problem solving. Org. Sci., ePub ahead of print August 16, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18430.Google Scholar
  • Brand J, Israeli A, Ngwe D (2023) Using GPT for market research. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Brandts J, Groenert V, Rott C (2015) The impact of advice on women’s and men’s selection into competition. Management Sci. 61(5):1018–1035.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Li D, Raymond LR (2023) Generative AI at work. Working paper, Standford University, Santa Clara, CA.Google Scholar
  • Bubeck S, Chandrasekaran V, Eldan R, Gehrke J, Horvitz E, Kamar E, Lee P, et al. (2023) Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. Working paper, Microsoft, Richmond, WA.Google Scholar
  • Bunescu RC, Uduehi OO (2019) Learning to surprise: A composer-audience architecture. Internat. Conf. Innovative Comput. Cloud Comput. (ICCC’19) (Charlotte, NC), 41–48.Google Scholar
  • Cho C-H, Cheon HJ (2004) Why do people avoid advertising on the internet? J. Advertising 33(4):89–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darley WK, Smith RE (1993) Advertising claim objectivity: Antecedents and effects. J. Marketing 57(4):100–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das G, Wiener HJD, Kareklas I (2019) To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising. J. Bus. Res. 96:147–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport TH, Mittal N (2022) How generative AI is changing creative work. Harvard Bus. Rev. (November 14), https://hbr.org/2022/11/how-generative-ai-is-changing-creative-work.Google Scholar
  • Dell’Acqua F, McFowland E, Mollick ER, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Kellogg K, Rajendran S, Krayer L, Candelon F, Lakhani KR (2023) Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Working paper, Havard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Di Fede G, Rocchesso D, Dow SP, Andolina S (2022) The idea machine: LLM-based expansion, rewriting, combination, and suggestion of ideas. Proc. 14th Conf. Creativity Cognition C&C ‘22 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 623–627.Google Scholar
  • Eloundou T, Manning S, Mishkin P, Rock D (2023) GPTs are GPTs: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. Working paper, Stanford University, Santa Clara, CA.Google Scholar
  • Ericsson KA, Hoffman RR, Kozbelt A (2018) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2021) Will humans-in-the-loop become borgs? Merits and pitfalls of working with AI. MIS Quart. 45(3):1527–1556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2022) Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):678–696.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gaube S, Suresh H, Raue M, Lermer E, Koch TK, Hudecek MFC, Ackery AD, et al. (2023) Non-task expert physicians benefit from correct explainable AI advice when reviewing x-rays. Sci. Rep. 13(1):1383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ge R, Zheng ZE, Tian X, Liao L (2021) Human–robot interaction: When investors adjust the usage of robo-advisors in peer-to-peer lending. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):774–785.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horton JJ (2023) Large language models as simulated economic agents: What can we learn from Homo silicus? Working paper, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Jacowitz KE, Kahneman D (1995) Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(11):1161–1166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jentzsch S, Kersting K (2023) ChatGPT is fun, but it is not funny! Humor is still challenging large language models. Preprint, submitted June 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04563.Google Scholar
  • Jussupow E, Spohrer K, Heinzl A, Gawlitza J (2021) Augmenting medical diagnosis decisions? An investigation into physicians’ decision-making process with artificial intelligence. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):713–735.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim T, Barasz K, John LK (2019) Why am I seeing this ad? The effect of ad transparency on ad effectiveness. J. Consumer Res. 45(5):906–932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koch T, Denner N, Crispin M, Hohagen T (2023) Funny but not credible? Why using (many) emojis decreases message credibility and source trustworthiness. Soc. Media Soc., ePub ahead of print September 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231194584.Google Scholar
  • Lee D, Hosanagar K, Nair HS (2018) Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Sci. 64(11):5105–5131.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lysyakov M, Viswanathan S (2023) Threatened by AI: Analyzing users’ responses to the introduction of AI in a crowd-sourcing platform. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):1191–1210.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muennighoff N, Tazi N, Magne L, Reimers N (2023) MTEB: Massive text embedding benchmark. Preprint, submitted October 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07316.Google Scholar
  • Naik PA, Mantrala MK, Sawyer AG (1998) Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. 17(3):214–235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Noy S, Zhang W (2023) Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381(6654):187–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson JA, Nahas J, Chmoulevitch D, Cropper SJ, Webb ME (2021) Naming unrelated words predicts creativity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(25):e2022340118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • OpenAI (2024) GPT-4 technical report. Report, OpenAI.Google Scholar
  • Orwig W, Diez I, Vannini P, Beaty R, Sepulcre J (2021) Creative connections: Computational semantic distance captures individual creativity and resting-state functional connectivity. J. Cognitive Neuroscience 33(3):499–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouyang L, Wu J, Jiang X, Almeida D, Wainwright CL, Mishkin P, Zhang C, et al. (2022) Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Preprint, submitted March 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02155.Google Scholar
  • Padmakumar V, He H (2023) Does writing with language models reduce content diversity? Preprint, submitted September 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05196.Google Scholar
  • Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 17:22–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pieters R, Warlop L, Wedel M (2002) Breaking through the clutter: Benefits of advertisement originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory. Management Sci. 48(6):765–781.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith RE, Chen J, Yang X (2008) The impact of advertising creativity on the hierarchy of effects. J. Advertising 37(4):47–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith RE, MacKenzie SB, Yang X, Buchholz LM, Darley WK (2007) Modeling the determinants and effects of creativity in advertising. Marketing Sci. 26(6):819–833.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stevenson C, Smal I, Baas M, Grasman R, van der Maas H (2022) Putting GPT-3′s creativity to the (alternative uses) test. Preprint, submitted June 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08932.Google Scholar
  • Teixeira T, Picard R, el Kaliouby R (2014) Why, when, and how much to entertain consumers in advertisements? A web-based facial tracking field study. Marketing Sci. 33(6):809–827.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(6):1063–1070.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou J (2003) When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. J. Appl. Psych. 88(3):413–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.