Backfiring AI? AI Deployment in Workplace
Published Online:4 May 2026https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03108
References
- (2020) Expertise and discretionary bonus decisions. Management Sci. 66(1):415–432.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. J. Econom. Perspect. 33(2):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Too much data: Prices and inefficiencies in data markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 14(4):218–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. J. Econom. Perspect. 33(2):31–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Ad-blockers: A blessing or a curse? Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):627–646.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J. Econom. Perspect. 29(3):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The Turing trap: The promise and peril of human-like artificial intelligence. Daedalus 151(2):272–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science 358(6370):1530–1534.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025a) Canaries in the coal mine? Six facts about the recent employment effects of artificial intelligence. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- (2025b) Generative AI at work. Quart. J. Econom. 140(2):889–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 23–57.Google Scholar
- (2007) Sorting and incentive effects of pay for performance: An experimental investigation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):387–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Generative AI and firm values. NBER Working Paper 31222, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2023) GPTs are GPTs: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. Preprint, submitted August 21, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130.Google Scholar
- (2018) A method to link advances in artificial intelligence to occupational abilities. AEA Papers Proc. 108:54–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management J. 42(12):2195–2217.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized. Humanities Soc. Sci. Comm. 7(1):10.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(14):6531–6539.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) AI and the economy. Innovation Policy Econom. 19:161–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Reconciling deep learning with symbolic artificial intelligence: Representing objects and relations. Curr. Opinion Behav. Sci. 29:17–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Gartner (2024) AI in HR: The CHRO’s role in AI transformation. Accessed April 20, 2026, https://www.gartner.com/en/human-resources/topics/artificial-intelligence-in-hr.Google Scholar
- (2014) Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Rev. 24(1):41–52.Google Scholar
- (2020) Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):627–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):57–80.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Compensation packages that actually drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. (January–February), https://hbr.org/2021/01/compensation-packages-that-actually-drive-performance.Google Scholar
- (2021) On queue-length information when customers travel to a queue. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):989–1004.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) When does pay for performance motivate employee helping behavior? The contextual influence of performance subjectivity. Acad. Management J. 64(1):293–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Artificial general intelligence: Are we close, and does it even make sense to try? Accessed April 20, 2026, https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/10/15/1010461/artificial-general-intelligence-robots-ai-agi-deepmind-google-openai/.Google Scholar
- (2016) Competing for attention in social communication markets. Management Sci. 62(8):2304–2320.Link, Google Scholar
- (2026) AI, skill, and productivity: The case of taxi drivers. Management Sci. 72(2):1376–1388.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Compensation and incentives in the workplace. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(3):195–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Computers and populism: Artificial intelligence, jobs, and politics in the near term. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 34(3):393–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Generative AI: From buzz to business value. KPMG, https://kpmg.com/us/en/articles/2024/moving-ai-buzz-value.html.Google Scholar
- (1972) Expectations and the neutrality of money. J. Econom. Theory 4(2):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
- McKinsey Global Institute (2018) AI, automation, and the future of work: Ten things to solve for. Accessed April 20, 2026, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/ai-automation-and-the-future-of-work-ten-things-to-solve-for.Google Scholar
- (2022) How artificial intelligence enhances human learning abilities: Opportunities in the fight against COVID-19. Service Sci. 14(2):77–89.Link, Google Scholar
- Microsoft (2025) Wellbeing and productivity tools. Accessed April 20, 2026, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-viva/insights.Google Scholar
- (2022) Detect, understand, act: A neuro-symbolic hierarchical reinforcement learning framework. Machine Learn. 111(4):1523–1549.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381(6654):187–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Next generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Quart. 43(1):iii–iix.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Technical debt and the reliability of enterprise software systems: A competing risks analysis. Management Sci. 62(5):1487–1510.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Reshaping business with artificial intelligence: Closing the gap between ambition and action. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 59(1):1–17.Google Scholar
- (2022) Division of labor through self-selection. Organ. Sci. 33(2):810–830.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Dynamic incentives in sales force compensation. Marketing Sci. 35(4):676–689.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Using explainable artificial intelligence to improve process quality: Evidence from semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 68(8):5704–5723.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Amazon patents wristband that tracks warehouse workers’ movements. Accessed April 20, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/31/amazon-warehouse-wristband-tracking.Google Scholar
- (2023) Evolution of AI in salesforce ecosystem (2014 to 2025). cyntexa (November 1), https://cyntexa.com/blog/evolution-of-ai-in-salesforce/.Google Scholar
- (1996) Agency theory and variable pay compensation strategies. Acad. Management J. 39(3):751–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Predicting human discretion to adjust algorithmic prescription: A large-scale field experiment in warehouse operations. Management Sci. 68(2):846–865.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Use of data analytics by Uber to enhance supply efficiency and service quality. Accessed April 20, 2026, https://www.pickl.ai/blog/use-of-data-analytics-by-uber-to-enhance-supply-efficiency-and-service-quality/.Google Scholar
- (2026) The power of disagreement: A field experiment to investigate human–algorithm collaboration in loan evaluations. Management Sci. 72(1):96–118.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) The impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market. Preprint, submitted January 11, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3482150.Google Scholar
- (2025) My advisor, her AI, and me: Evidence from a field experiment on human–AI collaboration and investment decisions. Management Sci. 72(1):242–264.Google Scholar
- (2013) Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24(2):339–355.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Advanced technologies adoption and use by U.S. firms: Evidence from the annual business survey. NBER Working Paper 28290, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

