Source Theory: A Tractable and Positive Ambiguity Theory

References

• Abdellaoui M, Baillon A, Placido L, Wakker PP (2011) The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):695–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. 34(1):199–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armantier O, Treich N (2016) The rich domain of risk. Management Sci. 62(7):1954–1969.Link, Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Huang Z, Selim A, Wakker PP (2018a) Measuring ambiguity attitudes for all (natural) events. Econometrica 86(5):1839–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Keskin U, l’Haridon O, Li C (2018b) The effect of learning on ambiguity attitudes. Management Sci. 64(5):2181–2198.Link, Google Scholar
• Basu P, Echenique F (2020) On the falsifiability and learnability of decision theories. Theoret. Econom. 15(4):1279–1305.Google Scholar
• Berger L, Emmerling J, Tavoni M (2017) Managing catastrophic climate risks under model uncertainty aversion. Management Sci. 63(3):749–765.Link, Google Scholar
• Buchak L (2013) Risk and Rationality (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Weber M (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):325–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy R, Dowell G, Mayer C, Plambeck E, Serafeim G, Toffel M, Toktay B, Weber E (2019) Management Science—Special issue on business and climate change. Management Sci. 65(7):3447–3448.Link, Google Scholar
• Chateauneuf A, Eichberger J, Grant S (2007) Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: Neo-additive capacities. J. Econom. Theory 137(1):538–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhong S (2024) Source dependence in effort provision. Internat. Econom. Rev. 65(3):1499–1517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Sagi JS (2008) Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory 139(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Miao B, Zhong S (2017) Partial ambiguity. Econometrica 85(4):1239–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Li KK, Chark R, Zhong S (2008) Source preference and ambiguity aversion: Models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments. Adv. Health Econom. Health Services Res. 20:179–201.Google Scholar
• de Lara Resende JG, Wu G (2010) Competence effects for choices involving gains and losses. J. Risk Uncertainity 40(2):109–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean M, Ortoleva P (2017) Allais, Ellsberg, and preferences for hedging. Theoret. Econom. 12(1):377–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denti T, Pomatto L (2022) Model and predictive uncertainty: A foundation for smooth ambiguity preference. Econometrica 90(2):551–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dillenberger D, Postlewaite A, Rozen K (2017) Optimism and pessimism with expected utility. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(5):1158–1175.Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Wakker PP (2016) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62(5):1363–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM (1985) Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psych. Rev. 92(4):433–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (2011) Notes on the origins of the Ellsberg urns (introduction to the symposium issue). Econom. Theory 48(2–3):221–227.Google Scholar
• Epstein LG, Halevy Y (2019) Ambiguous correlation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(2):668–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr-Duda H, Epper T (2012) Probability and risk: Foundations and economic implications of probability-dependent risk preferences. Annual Rev. Econom. 4(1):567–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fellner W (1961) Distortion of subjective probabilities as a reaction to uncertainty. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):670–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Tversky A (1998) A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Sci. 44(7):879–895.Link, Google Scholar
• French KR, Poterba JM (1991) Investor diversification and international equity markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):222–226.Google Scholar
• Georgalos K (2019) An experimental test of the predictive power of dynamic ambiguity models. J. Risk Uncertainity 59(1):51–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Marinacci M (2001) Risk, ambiguity, and the separation of utility and beliefs. Math. Oper. Res. 26(4):864–890.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2004) Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econom. Theory 118(2):133–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I (1987) Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J. Math. Econom. 16(1):65–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I (2009) Theory of Decision Under Uncertainty, Econometric Society Monograph Series (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Marinacci M (2016) Ambiguity and the Bayesian paradigm. Arló-Costa H, Hendricks VF, van Benthem JAK, eds. Readings in Formal Epistemology (Springer, Berlin), 385–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R, Wu G (1999) On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant S, Rich P, Stecher J (2022) Bayes and Hurwicz without Bernoulli. J. Econom. Theory 199:105027.Google Scholar
• Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2015) Hurwicz expected utility and subjective sources. J. Econom. Theory 159:465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutierrez C, Kemel E (2024) Measuring natural source preferences. Experiment. Econom. 27(2):379–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henkel L (2024) Experimental evidence on the relationship between perceived ambiguity and likelihood insensitivity. Games Econom. Behav. 145:312–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hens T, Reichlin C (2013) Three solutions to the pricing kernel puzzle. Rev. Finance 17(1):1065–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill B (2019) A non-Bayesian theory of state-dependent utility. Econometrica 87(4):1341–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ivanov A (2011) Attitudes to ambiguity in one-shot normal-form games: An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 71:366–394.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karni E, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2014) Ambiguity and nonexpected utility. Young HP, Zamir S, eds. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol. 4 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 901–947.Google Scholar
• Karni E, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2022) David Schmeidler’s contributions to decision theory. Theory Decision 93(2):219–235.Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6):1849–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• König-Kersting C, Kops C, Trautmann ST (2023) A test of (weak) certainty independence. J. Econom. Theory 209:105623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kontek K, Lewandowski M (2018) Range-dependent utility. Management Sci. 64(6):2812–2832.Link, Google Scholar
• Kothiyal A, Spinu V, Wakker PP (2014) An experimental test of prospect theory for predicting choice under ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainity 48(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krantz DH, Luce RD, Suppes P, Tversky A (1971) Foundations of Measurement, Volume I (Additive and Polynomial Representations) (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kreps DM (1988) Notes on the Theory of Choice (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Liu P, Schied A, Wang R (2021) Distributional transforms, probability distortions, and their applications. Math. Oper. Res. 46(4):1490–1512.Link, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ (1989) Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J. Econom. Literature 27(4):1622–1688.Google Scholar
• Machina MJ (2009) Risk, ambiguity, and the rank-dependence axioms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):385–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ, Schmeidler D (1992) A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60(6):745–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ, Siniscalchi M (2014) Ambiguity and ambiguity aversion. Machina M, Viscusi K, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 729–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marinacci M (2015) Model uncertainty. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(6):1022–1100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polisson M, Quah JK-H, Renou L (2020) Revealed preferences over risk and uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(6):1782–1820.Google Scholar
• Polkovnichenko V, Zhao F (2013) Probability weighting functions implied in options prices. J. Financial Econom. 107(3):580–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3):571–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider FH, Schonger M (2019) An experimental test of the Anscombe–Aumann monotonicity axiom. Management Sci. 65(4):1667–1677.Link, Google Scholar
• Sonsino D, Lahav Y, Roth Y (2022) Reaching for returns in retail structured investment. Management Sci. 68(1):466–486.Link, Google Scholar
• Spiliopoulos L, Hertwig R (2023) Variance, skewness and multiple outcomes in described and experienced prospects: Can one descriptive model capture it all? J. Experiment. Psych. General 152(4):1188–1222.Google Scholar
• Trautmann ST, van de Kuilen G (2015) Ambiguity attitudes. Keren G, Wu G, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 89–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Fox CR (1995) Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. 102(2):269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Wakker PP (1995) Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica 63(4):1255–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2004) On the composition of risk preference and belief. Psych. Rev. 111(1):236–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang F (2022) Rank-dependent utility under multiple priors. Management Sci. 68(11):8166–8183.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Wei Y, Willmot GE (2020) Characterization, robustness, and aggregation of signed Choquet integrals. Math. Oper. Res. 45(3):993–1015.Link, Google Scholar
• Watanabe M, Fujimi T (2024) Ambiguity attitudes toward natural and artificial sources in gain and loss domains. J. Risk Uncertainity 68(1):51–75.Crossref, Google Scholar