Interacting with Man or Machine: When Do Humans Reason Better?

References

• Akiyama E, Hanaki N, Ishikawa R (2017) It is not just confusion! Strategic uncertainty in an experimental asset market. Econom. J. (London) 127(605):F563–F580.Google Scholar
• Aldrich EM, Vargas KL (2019) Experiments in high-frequency trading: Comparing two market institutions. Experiment. Econom. 23(2):322–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Miller J (2002) Giving according to Garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica 70(2):737–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashktorab Z, Liao QV, Dugan C, Johnson J, Pan Q, Zhang W, Kumaravel S, Campbell M (2020) Human-AI collaboration in a cooperative game setting. Nichols J, ed. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interaction, vol. 4 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–20.Google Scholar
• Bao T, Nekrasova E, Neugebauer T, Riyanto YE (2022) Algorithmic trading in experimental markets with human traders: A literature survey. Füllbrunn S, Haruvy E, eds. Handbook of Experimental Finance (Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 302–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U (1985) Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayer R-C, Renou L (2016a) Logical abilities and behavior in strategic-form games. J. Econom. Psych. 56:39–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayer RC, Renou L (2016b) Logical omniscience at the laboratory. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 64:41–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonner SE, Hastie R, Sprinkle GB, Young SM (2000) A review of the effects of financial incentives on performance in laboratory tasks: Implications for management accounting. J. Management Accounting Res. 12(1):19–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buczynski W, Cuzzolin F, Sahakian B (2021) A review of machine learning experiments in equity investment decision-making: Why most published research findings do not live up to their promise in real life. Internat. J. Data Sci. Anal. 11(3):221–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Hogarth RM (1999) The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty 19:7–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Canessa N, Gorini A, Cappa SF, Piattelli-Palmarini M, Danna M, Fazio F, Perani D (2005) The effect of social content on deductive reasoning: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping 26(1):30–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao T, Duh R-R, Tan H-T, Xu T (2021) Enhancing auditors’ reliance on data analytics under inspection risk using fixed and growth mindsets. Accounting Rev. 97(3):131–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen CX, Hudgins R, Wright WF (2021) The effect of advice valence on the perceived credibility of data analytics. J. Management Accounting Res. 34(2):97–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Commerford BP, Dennis SA, Joe JR, Ulla JW (2021) Man vs. machine: Complex estimates and auditor reliance on artificial intelligence. J. Accounting Res. 60(1):171–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cosmides L (1989) The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31(3):187–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dargnies M-P, Hakimov R, Kübler DF (2022) Aversion to hiring algorithms: Transparency, gender profiling, and self-confidence. Preprint, submitted October 7, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4238275.Google Scholar
• Das R, Hanson JE, Kephart JO, Tesauro G (2001) Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction. Proc. 17th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Burlington, MA), 1169–1176.Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Bharti S (2020) People reject algorithms in uncertain decision domains because they have diminishing sensitivity to forecasting error. Psych. Sci. 31(10):1302–1314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2015) Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Experiment. Psych. General 144(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efendić E, de Calseyde PPV, Evans AM (2020) Slow response times undermine trust in algorithmic (but not human) predictions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 157:103–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filiz I, Judek JR, Lorenz M, Spiwoks M (2022) Algorithm aversion as an obstacle in the establishment of robo advisors. J. Risk Financial Management 15(8):353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) Z-tree—Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao X, Gong R, Zhao Y, Wang S, Shu T, Zhu S-C (2020) Joint mind modeling for explanation generation in complex human-robot collaborative tasks. 29th IEEE Internat. Conf. Robot Human Interactive Comm. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1119–1126.Google Scholar
• Geraghty R, Hale J, Sen S, Kroecker TS (2020) Fun-agent: A 2020 HUMAINE competition entrant. Proc. First Internat. Workshop Multimodal Conversational AI (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 15–21.Google Scholar
• Germann M, Merkle C (2019) Algorithm aversion in financial investing. Preprint, submitted November 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3364850.Google Scholar
• Gjerstad S (2007) The competitive market paradox. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 31(5):1753–1780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B, Grünwald P, Lindner T, Leitner G, Wierensperger M (2022) Incentives, framing, and trust in algorithmic advice: An experimental study. Working Paper No. 01/202, Department of Strategy and Innovation, WU Vienna, Wien, Austria.Google Scholar
• Hanaki N, Akiyama E, Ishikawa R (2018) Behavioral uncertainty and the dynamics of traders’ confidence in their price forecasts. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 88:121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R, Ortmann A (2001) Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behav. Brain Sci. 24(3):383–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertz N, Wiese E (2019) Good advice is beyond all price, but what if it comes from a machine? J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 25(3):386–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird P (2006) How We Reason (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Jung M, Seiter M (2021) Toward a better understanding on mitigating algorithm aversion in forecasting: An experimental study. J. Management Control 32(4):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi K (2021) When will workers follow an algorithm? A field experiment with a retail business. Management Sci. 67(3):1670–1695.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie AM, Thaiss L (1992) Domain specificity in conceptual development: Neuropsychological evidence from autism. Cognition 43(3):225–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang C, Proft J, Andersen E, Knepper RA (2019) Implicit communication of actionable information in human-AI teams. Proc. 2019 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
• Littlewood JE (1953) A Mathematician’s Miscellany (Meuthen & Co. Ltd., London).Google Scholar
• Luca MD, Cliff D (2011) Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction, redux—Using the OpEx laboratory-in-a-box to explore ZIP and GDX. Proc. Third Internat. Conf. Agents Artificial Intelligence (SciTePress–Science and Technology Publications, Setúbal, Portugal).Google Scholar
• Maedche A, Legner C, Benlian A, Berger B, Gimpel H, Hess T, Hinz O, Morana S, Söllner M (2019) AI-based digital assistants. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 61(4):535–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March C (2021) Strategic interactions between humans and artificial intelligence: Lessons from experiments with computer players. J. Econom. Psych. 87:102426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Memmert L, Bittner E (2022) Complex problem solving through human-AI collaboration: Literature review on research contexts. Proc. Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (ScholarSpace, Honolulu, HI), 1–10.Google Scholar
• Merritt T, McGee K (2012) Protecting artificial team-mates: More seems like less. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 2793–2802.Google Scholar
• Murray A, Rhymer J, Sirmon DG (2021) Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):552–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Shachat J, Wei L, Zhang SS (2024) Speed traps: Algorithmic trader performance under alternative market balances and structures. Exp. Econ. 27:325–350.Google Scholar
• Shrestha YR, Ben-Menahem SM, von Krogh G (2019) Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Rev. 61(4):66–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tabrez A, Agrawal S, Hayes B (2019) Explanation-based reward coaching to improve human performance via reinforcement learning. 14th ACM/IEEE Internat. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 249–257.Google Scholar
• Tai C-C, Chen S-H, Yang L-X (2018) Cognitive ability and earnings performance: Evidence from double auction market experiments. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 91:409–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven WPMM, Van Praag BMS (1981) The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection. J. Econometrics 17(2):229–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang N, Pynadath DV, Hill SG (2016) The impact of POMDP-generated explanations on trust and performance in human-robot teams. Proc. 2016 Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC), 997–1005.Google Scholar
• Wason PC (1966) Reasoning. Voss BM, ed. New Horizons in Psychology, vol. 1 (Penguin, London), 135–151.Google Scholar
• Weber RA (2001) Behavior and learning in the dirty faces game. Experiment. Econom. 4(3):229–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson HJ, Daugherty PR (2018) Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Bus. Rev. (July–August), https://hbr.org/2018/07/collaborative-intelligence-humans-and-ai-are-joining-forces.Google Scholar