Who Does the Talking Here? The Impact of Gender Composition on Team Interactions

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94(2):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, de Haan J, Terjesen S, van Ees H (2015) Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Corporate Governance 23(2):77–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Ubaydli O, List JA (2013) On the generalizability of experimental results in economics: With a response to Camerer. NBER Working Paper No. 19666, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Alan S, Ertac S, Kubilay E, Loranth G (2020) Understanding gender differences in leadership. Econom. J. 130(626):263–289.Google Scholar
• Alliance for Board Diversity and Deloitte (2021) Missing pieces report: The board diversity census of women and minorities on fortune 500 boards, 6th ed. Accessed August 21, 2024, https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/us-missing-pieces-fortune-500-board-diversity-study-sixth-edition.pdf.Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Azmat G, Iriberri N (2012) The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. 58(1):78–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Arbak E, Villeval M-C (2013) Voluntary leadership: Motivation and influence. Soc. Choice Welfare 40:635–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aukrust VG (2008) Boys’ and girls’ conversational participation across four grade levels in Norwegian classrooms: Taking the floor or being given the floor? Gender Ed. 20(3):237–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Petrongolo B (2014) Gender and the labor market: What have we learned from field and lab experiments? Labour Econom. 30:32–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2013) Team incentives: Evidence from a firm level experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(5):1079–1114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsbai T, Licuanan V, Steinmayr A, Tiongson E, Yang D (2020) Information and the acquisition of social network connections. NBER Working Paper No. 27346, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Hallock KF (2001) The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Industry Labor Related Rev. 55(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau F, Kahn L (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econom. Literature 55(3):789–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borghans L, Golsteyn BH, Heckman JJ, Humphries JE (2016) What grades and achievement tests measure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(47):13354–13359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Born A, Ranehill E, Sandberg A (2022) Gender and willingness to lead: Does the gender composition of teams matter? Rev. Econom. Statist. 104(2):259–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Yuan H (2023) Public speaking aversion. Management Sci. 69(5):2746–2760.Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell K, Mínguez-Vera A (2008) Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. J. Bus. Ethics 83:435–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter AJ, Croft A, Lukas D, Sandstrom GM (2018) Women’s visibility in academic seminars: Women ask fewer questions than men. PLoS One 13(9):e0202743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Center for American Women and Politics (2022) Women appointed to presidential cabinets. Accessed August 21, 2024, https://cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/womenapptdtoprescabinets.pdf.Google Scholar
• Chapple L, Humphrey JE (2014) Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. J. Bus. Ethics 122:709–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Cooper DJ, Grossman Z (2020) Silence is golden: Team problem solving and communication costs. Experiment. Econom. 23:668–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree: An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Congressional Research Service (2022) Women in Congress, 1917–2022: Service dates and committee assignments by member, and lists by state and Congress. Accessed August 21, 2024, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL30261.pdf.Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Saral K, Villeval MC (2021) Why join a team? Management Sci. 67(11):6980–6997.Link, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl GB, Kotsadam A, Rooth D-O (2021) Does integration change gender attitudes? The effect of randomly assigning women to traditionally male teams. Quart. J. Econom. 136(2):987–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport JRA, Fouesneau M, Grand E, Hagen A, Poppenhaeger K, Watkins LL (2014) Studying gender in conference talks: Data from the 223rd meeting of the American Astronomical Society. Preprint, submitted March 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.3091.Google Scholar
• De Paola M, Lombardo R, Pupo V, Scoppa V (2021) Do women shy away from public speaking? A field experiment. Labour Econom. 70:102001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deming DJ (2017) The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. Quart. J. Econom. 132(4):1593–1640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dupas P, Modestino AS, Niederle M, Wolfers J, Seminar Dynamics Collective (2021) Gender and the dynamics of economics seminars. NBER Working Paper No. 28494, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Edin P-A, Fredriksson P, Nybom M, Öckert B (2022) The rising return to noncognitive skill. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 14(2):78–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Grimm S, Schindler D, Schudy S (2024) The effect of incentives in non-routine analytical team tasks. J. Political Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Grimm S, Grothe D, Schindler D, Schudy S (2021) The value of leadership: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. CESifo Working Paper No. 9273, CESifo, Munich.Google Scholar
• Ertac S, Gurdal MY (2012) Deciding to decide: Gender, leadership and risk-taking in groups. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):24–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Starmer C, Tufano F (2024) Measuring “group cohesion” to reveal the power of social relationships in team production. Rev. Econom. Statist. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Gerlitz J-Y, Schupp J (2005) Zur Erhebung der big-five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. DIW Res. Notes 4:2005.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graetz G, Karimi A (2022) Gender gap variation across assessment types: Explanations and implications. Econom. Ed. Rev. 91:102313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosse S, Putterman L, Rockenbach B (2011) Monitoring in teams: Using laboratory experiments to study a theory of the firm. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(4):785–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo J, Recalde MP (2023) Overriding in teams: The role of beliefs, social image, and gender. Management Sci. 69(4):2239–2262.Link, Google Scholar
• Haegele I (2022) The broken rung: Gender and the leadership gap. Preprint, submitted April 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07750.Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2012) Diversity and productivity in production teams. Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds), 99–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinsley A, Sutherland WJ, Johnston A (2017) Men ask more questions than women at a scientific conference. PLoS One 12(10):e0185534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hjort J (2014) Ethnic divisions and production in firms. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1899–1946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn S, Van Praag M (2012) Ethnic diversity and team performance: A field experiment. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 12-068/3, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn S, Oosterbeek H, Van Praag M (2013) The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 59(7):1514–1528.Link, Google Scholar
• Isaksson S (2019) It takes two: Gender differences in group work. Mimeo, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Ivanova-Stenzel R, Kübler D (2011) Gender differences in team work and team competition. J. Econom. Psych. 32(5):797–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobi T, Schweers D (2017) Justice, interrupted: The effect of gender, ideology, and seniority at supreme court oral arguments. Virginia Law Rev. 103:1379–1496.Google Scholar
• Karpowitz CF, O’Connell SD, Preece J, Stoddard O (2024) Strength in numbers: Gender composition, leadership, and women’s influence in teams. J. Political Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly A (1988) Gender differences in teacher-pupil interactions: A meta-analytic review. Res. Ed. 39(1):1–23.Google Scholar
• Kling JR, Liebman JB, Katz LF (2007) Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica 75(1):83–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kling KC, Hyde JS, Showers CJ, Buswell BN (1999) Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 125(4):470–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn P, Villeval MC (2015) Are women more attracted to co-operation than men? Econom. J. 125(582):115–140.Google Scholar
• Lamiraud K, Vranceanu R (2018) Group gender composition and economic decision-making: Evidence from the Kallystée Business Game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 145:294–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E, Shaw KL (2007) Personnel economics: The economist’s view of human resources. J. Econom. Perspective 21(4):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2019) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. Experiment. Econom. 22:773–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ludwig S, Fellner-Röhling G, Thoma C (2017) Do women have more shame than men? An experiment on self-assessment and the shame of overestimating oneself. Eur. Econom. Rev. 92:31–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyons E (2017) Team production in international labor markets: Experimental evidence from the field. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(3):70–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacLaren NG, Yammarino FJ, Dionne SD, Sayama H, Mumford MD, Connelly S, Martin RW, et al. (2020) Testing the babble hypothesis: Speaking time predicts leader emergence in small groups. Leadership Quart. 31(5):101409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx B, Pons V, Suri T (2021) Diversity and team performance in a Kenyan organization. J. Public Econom. 197:104332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5(3):136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller MG, Sutherland JL (2023) The effect of gender on interruptions at congressional hearings. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 117(1):103–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O*NET OnLine (2022) Browse by work context: Work with work group or team. Retrieved April 2022, https://www.onetonline.org/find/descriptor/result/4.C.1.b.1.e?s=1&a=1.Google Scholar
• Owan H (2014) How should teams be formed and managed? IZA World Labor 2014:83.Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2021) STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity. Accessed August 21, 2024, https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2021/03/PS_2021.04.01_diversity-in-STEM_REPORT.pdf.Google Scholar
• Radbruch J, Schiprowski A (2023) Committee deliberation and gender differences in influences. Discussion Paper No. 398, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München and Berlin.Google Scholar
• Schmid Mast M (2002) Dominance as expressed and inferred through speaking time. Human Comm. Res. 28(3):420–450.Google Scholar
• Shan X (2022) The minority trap: Minority status drives women out of male-dominated fields. Mimeo, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Spencer Stuart (2021) 2021 U.S. Spencer Stuart Board Index. Accessed August 21, 2024, https://www.spencerstuart.com/-/media/2021/october/ssbi2021/us-spencer-stuart-board-index-2021.pdf.Google Scholar
• Terjesen S, Couto EB, Francisco PM (2016) Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. J. Management Governance 20:447–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weidmann B, Deming DJ (2021) Team players: How social skills improve team performance. Econometrica 89(6):2637–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar