Common Ownership, Competition, and Corporate Governance

References

• Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Real and formal authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105:1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amel-Zadeh A, Kasperk F, Schmalz M (2022) Mavericks, universal, and common owners: The largest shareholders of U.S. public firms. ECGI Working Paper No. 838, European Corporate Governance Institute, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Anton M, Ederer F, Giné M, Schmalz M (2023) Common ownership, competition, and top management incentives. J. Political Econom. 131(5):1294–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar J (2017) Portfolio diversification, market power, and the theory of the firm. Preprint, submitted July 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2811221.Google Scholar
• Azar J (2020) The common ownership trilemma. University Chicago Law Rev. 87:263–295.Google Scholar
• Azar J, Vives X (2021) General equilibrium oligopoly and ownership structure. Econometrica 89(3):999–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar J, Vives X (2022) Revisiting the anticompetitive effects of common ownership. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 16612. CEPR Press, Paris & London.Google Scholar
• Azar J, Schmalz M, Tecu I (2018) Anticompetitive effects of common ownership. J. Finance 73(4):1513–1565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar J, Schmalz M, Tecu I (2022) A refutation of ‘Common ownership does not have anti-competitive effects in the airline industry’. ECGI Working Paper No. 837, European Corporate Governance Institute, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Backus M, Conlon C, Sinkinson M (2021a) Common ownership and competition in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. NBER Working Paper No. 28350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Backus M, Conlon C, Sinkinson M (2021b) Common ownership in America: 1980–2017. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(3):273–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Cohen A, Hirst S (2017) The agency problem of institutional investors. J. Econom. Perspective 31:89–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim D, Whinston M (1986) Common agency, resource allocation, and economic influence. Quart. J. Econom. 101(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkart M, Gromb D, Panunzi F (1997) Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. Q. J. Econ. 112(3):693–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkart M, Gromb D, Panunzi F (1998) Why higher takeover premia protect minority shareholders. J. Polit. Econ. 106(1):172–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkart M, Panunzi F, Shleifer A (2003) Family firms. J. Finance 58(5):2167–2201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H, Lehn K (1985) The structures of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. J. Political Econom. 93:1155–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis P, Gerardi K, Schenone C (2022) Common ownership does not have anti-competitive effects in the airline industry. J. Finance 77(5):2766–2798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Pellegrino B (2022) A tale of two networks. Common ownership and product market rivalry. NBER Working Paper No. 30004, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Frey J, Ockenfels A, Schmalz M (2023) Diversification vs. monopolization: A laboratory experiment. Working paper, University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
• Grossman S, Hart O (1980) Takeover bids, the free rider problem, and the theory of corporation. Bell J. Econom. 11(1):42–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He J, Huang J (2017) Product market competition in a world of cross ownership: Evidence from institutional blockholding. Rev. Financial Stud. 30:2674–2718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huse C, Ribeiro R, Verboven F (2024) Common-ownership vs. cross-ownership: Evidence from the automobile industry. J. Industry Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, O’Brien P, Song M, Waehrer K (2017) The competitive effects of common ownership: Economic foundations and empirical evidence. Working paper, Bates White Economic Consulting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Koch A, Panayides M, Thomas S (2021) Common ownership and competition in product markets. J. Financial Econom. 1239:109–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy N, Spiegel Y, Gilo D (2018) Partial vertical integration, ownership structure, and foreclosure. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 10(1):132–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewellen K, Lowry M (2021) Does common ownership really increase firm coordination? J. Financial Econom. 141(1):322–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopez A, Vives X (2019) Overlapping ownership, R&D spillovers, and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. 127(5):2394–2437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manne H (1965) Mergers and the market for corporate control. J. Political Econom. 73(2):110–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Brien D, Salop S (2000) Competitive effects of partial ownership: Financial interest and corporate control. Antitrust Law J. 67:559–614.Google Scholar
• Park AH, Seo K (2019) Common ownership and product market competition: Evidence from the US airline industry. Working paper, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
• Piccolo A, Schneemeier J (2020) Ownership and competition. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
• Rotemberg J (1984) Financial transaction costs and industrial performance. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Schmalz M (2021) Recent studies on common ownership, firm behavior, and market outcomes. Antitrust Bull. 66(1):12–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shekita N (2021) Interventions by common owners. J. Competitive Law Econom. 18(1):99–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny R (1986) Large shareholders and corporate control. J. Political Econom. 94:461–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny R (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J. Finance 52(2):737–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shy O, Stenbacka R (2020) Common ownership, institutional investors, and welfare. J. Econom. Management Strategy 29(3):706–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiegel Y (2013) Backward integration, forward integration, and vertical foreclosure. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 9617. CEPR Press, Paris & London.Google Scholar