Dynamic Portfolio Selection and Asset Pricing Under Neo-Additive Probability Weighting

References

• Abdellaoui M, l’Haridon O, Zank H (2010) Separating curvature and elevation: A parametric probability weighting function. J. Risk Uncertainty 41(1):39–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azimi M, Ghazi S, Schneider M (2025) Probability weighting and equity premium prediction: Investing with optimism. Financial Management 54(3):455–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Emirmahmutoglu A, Jaspersen J, Peter R (2022) When risk perception gets in the way: Probability weighting and underprevention. Oper. Res. 70(3):1371–1392.Link, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Keskin U, l’Haridon O, Li C (2018) The effect of learning on ambiguity attitudes. Management Sci. 64(5):2181–2198.Link, Google Scholar
• Barberis N (2012) A model of casino gambling. Management Sci. 58(1):35–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M (2008) Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):2066–2100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Jin LJ, Wang B (2021) Prospect theory and stock market anomalies. J. Finance 76(5):2639–2687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Weber M, Welfens F (2011) Reference-point formation and updating. Management Sci. 57(3):506–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Belomestny D, Krätschmer V (2017) Optimal stopping under probability distortions. Math. Oper. Res. 42(3):806–833.Link, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyer B, Mitton T, Vorkink K (2010) Expected idiosyncratic skewness. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(1):169–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chateauneuf A, Eichberger J, Grant S (2007) Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: Neo-additive capacities. J. Econom. Theory 137(1):538–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Giorgi E, Hens T, Rieger MO (2010) Financial market equilibria with cumulative prospect theory. J. Math. Econom. 46(5):633–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dertwinkel-Kalt M, Frey J (2024) Optimal stopping in a dynamic salience model. Internat. Econom. Rev. (Philadelphia) 65(2):885–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Driessen J, Ebert S, Koëter J (2025) π-CAPM: The classical CAPM with probability weighting and skewed assets. Rev. Financial Stud. 38(12):3497–3541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duraj J (2020) Optimal stopping with general risk preferences. Preprint, submitted October 5, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2897765.Google Scholar
• Ebert S, Köster M (2026) On taking a skewed risk more than once. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 18(2):395–425.Google Scholar
• Ebert S, Strack P (2015) Until the bitter end: On prospect theory in a dynamic context. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(4):1618–1633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert S, Strack P (2026) Never, ever getting started: On prospect theory without commitment. Math. Finance, ePub ahead of print April 8, https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.70028.Google Scholar
• Ebert S, Voigt M (2026) Eliciting stopping times. Preprint, submitted March 16, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4526931.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Hoffmann G, Schudy S (2017) The causal effect of stop-loss and take-gain orders on the disposition effect. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(6):2110–2129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabrieli T, Ghosal S (2013) Non-existence of competitive equilibria with dynamically inconsistent preferences. Econom. Theory 52:299–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghazi S, Schneider M (2022) Asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty: A case for optimism. Preprint, submitted July 3, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3990485.Google Scholar
• Ghazi S, Schneider M, Strauss J (2025) Market ambiguity attitude restores the risk-return trade-off. Management Sci. 71(10):8430–8451.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghossoub M, He XD (2021) Comparative risk aversion in RDEU with applications to optimal underwriting of securities issuance. Insurance: Math. Econom. 101:6–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein WM, Einhorn HJ (1987) Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psych. Rev. 94(2):236–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He XD, Hu S (2024) Never stop or never start? Optimal stopping under a mixture of CPT and EUT preferences. J. Econom. Theory 222:105925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He XD, Zhou XY (2011) Portfolio choice via quantiles. Math. Finance 21(2):203–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He XD, Zhou XY (2016) Hope, fear and aspirations. Math. Finance 26(1):3–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He XD, Zhou XY (2022) Who are I: Time inconsistency and intrapersonal conflict and reconciliation. Yin G, Zariphopoulou T, eds. Stochastic Analysis, Filtering, and Stochastic Optimization: A Commemorative Volume to Honor Mark H. A. Davis’s Contributions (Springer, Berlin), 177–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He XD, Hu S, Obłój J, Zhou XY (2017) Path-dependent and randomized strategies in Barberis’ casino gambling model. Oper. Res. 65(1):97–103.Link, Google Scholar
• He XD, Hu S, Obłój J, Zhou XY (2019) Optimal exit time from casino gambling: Strategies of precommitted and naive gamblers. SIAM J. Control Optim. 57(3):1845–1868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heimer RZ, Iliewa Z, Imas A, Weber M (2025) Dynamic inconsistency in risky choice: Evidence from the lab and field. Amer. Econom. Rev. 115(1):330–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson V, Hobson D, Tse A (2017) Randomized strategies and prospect theory in a dynamic context. J. Econom. Theory 168:287–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson V, Hobson D, Tse A (2018) Probability weighting, stop-loss and the disposition effect. J. Econom. Theory 178:360–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herings PJ-J, Rohde KI (2006) Time-inconsistent preferences in a general equilibrium model. Econom. Theory 29:591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Jin H, Zhou XY (2021) Consistent investment of sophisticated rank-dependent utility agents in continuous time. Math. Finance 31(3):1056–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu S, Obłój J, Zhou XY (2023) A casino gambling model under cumulative prospect theory: Analysis and algorithm. Management Sci. 69(4):2474–2496.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang Y-J, Nguyen-Huu A, Zhou XY (2020) General stopping behaviors of naïve and non-committed sophisticated agents, with application to probability distortion. Math. Finance 30(1):310–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingersoll JE (2016) Cumulative prospect theory, aggregation, and pricing. Critical Finance Rev. 5(2):305–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. J. Finance 48(1):65–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin H, Zhou XY (2008) Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time. Math. Finance 18(3):385–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin H, Xia J, Zhou XY (2019) Arrow-Debreu equilibria for rank-dependent utilities with heterogeneous probability weighting. Math. Finance 29(3):898–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim TS, Omberg E (1996) Dynamic nonmyopic portfolio behavior. Rev. Financial Stud. 9(1):141–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krusell P, Smith AA Jr (2003) Consumption–savings decisions with quasi–geometric discounting. Econometrica 71(1):365–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A (2009) Who gambles in the stock market? J. Finance 64(4):1889–1933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luttmer EG, Mariotti T (2003) Subjective discounting in an exchange economy. J. Political Econom. 111(5):959–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luttmer EG, Mariotti T (2006) Competitive equilibrium when preferences change over time. Econom. Theory 27:679–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luttmer EG, Mariotti T (2007) Efficiency and equilibrium when preferences are time-inconsistent. J. Econom. Theory 132(1):493–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ (1989) Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J. Econom. Literature 27(4):1622–1668.Google Scholar
• Moskowitz TJ, Grinblatt M (1999) Do industries explain momentum? J. Finance 54(4):1249–1290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polkovnichenko V (2005) Household portfolio diversification: A case for rank-dependent preferences. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(4):1467–1502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shefrin H, Statman M (1985) The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. J. Finance 40(3):777–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Cui X, Zhou XY (2023) Beta and coskewness pricing: Perspective from probability weighting. Oper. Res. 71(2):776–790.Link, Google Scholar
• Starmer C (2000) Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Literature 38(2):332–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strotz RH (1955-1956) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23(3):165–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xia J, Zhou XY (2016) Arrow-Debreu equilibria for rank-dependent utilities. Math. Finance 26(3):558–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu ZQ, Zhou XY (2012) Optimal stopping under probability distortion. Ann. Appl. Probability 23(1):251–282.Google Scholar