Reproducibility in Management Science

References

• Ankel-Peters J, Fiala N, Neubauer F (2023) Do economists replicate? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 212:219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artner R, Verliefde T, Steegen S, Gomes S, Traets F, Tuerlinckx F, Vanpaemel W (2021) The reproducibility of statistical results in psychological research: An investigation using unpublished raw data. Psych. Methods 26(5):527–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brodeur A, Lé M, Sangnier M, Zylberberg Y (2016) Star wars: The empirics strike back. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 8(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Dreber A, Forsell E, Ho TH, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, et al. (2016) Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science 351(6280):1433–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Dreber A, Holzmeister F, Ho TH, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, et al. (2018) Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in nature and science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behav. 2(9):637–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang AC, Li P (2017) A preanalysis plan to replicate sixty economics research papers that worked half of the time. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):60–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen G, Miguel E (2018) Transparency, reproducibility, and the credibility of economics research. J. Econom. Literature 56(3):920–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemens MA (2017) The meaning of failed replications: A review and proposal. J. Econom. Survey 31(1):326–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colliard J-E, Hurlin C, Pérignon C (2023) The economics of computational reproducibility. Research Paper No. FIN-2019-1345, HEC Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Flicker B, Hyndman KB, Katok E, Keppler S, Leider S, Long X, et al. (2023) A replication study of operations management experiments in Management Science. Management Sci. 69(9):4977–4991.Link, Google Scholar
• De Long JB, Lang K (1992) Are all economic hypotheses false? J. Political Econom. 100(6):1257–1272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewald WG, Thursby JG, Anderson RG (1986) Replication in empirical economics: The journal of money, credit and banking project. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):587–603.Google Scholar
• Dreber A, Johannesson M (2023) A framework for evaluating reproducibility and replicability in economics. Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Eubank N (2016) Lessons from a decade of replications at the quarterly journal of political science. PS Political Sci. Politics 49(2):273–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freese J, Peterson D (2017) Replication in social science. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43:147–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gertler P, Galiani S, Romero M (2018) How to make replication the norm. Nature 554(7693):417–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glandon PJ (2011) Appendix to the report of the editor: Report on the american economic review data availability compliance project. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):695–699.Google Scholar
• Hamermesh DS (2007) Replication in economics. Canadian J. Econom. 40(3):715–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herbert S, Kingi H, Stanchi F, Vilhuber L (2023) The reproducibility of economics research: A case study. Working paper, Banque de France, Paris.Google Scholar
• Höffler JH (2017) Replication and economics journal policies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):52–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hornik K (2005) A clue for cluster ensembles. J. Statist. Software 14:1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2(8):e124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP, Doucouliagos C (2013) What’s to know about the credibility of empirical economics? J. Econom. Survey 27(5):997–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP, Allison DB, Ball CA, Coulibaly I, Cui X, Culhane AC, Falchi M, et al. (2009) Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses. Nature Genetics 41(2):149–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John LK, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2012) Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psych. Sci. 23(5):524–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn HW (1955) The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 2:83–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Bailey CD, Euzent PJ, Martin TL (2001) Academic economists behaving badly? A survey on three areas of unethical behavior. Econom. Inquiry 39(1):162–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullough BD, McGeary KA, Harrison TD (2006) Lessons from the JMCB archive. J. Money Credit Bank. 38(4):1093–1107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullough BD, McGeary KA, Harrison TD (2008) Do economics journal archives promote replicable research? Canadian J. Econom. 41(4):1406–1420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menkveld AJ, Dreber A, Holzmeister F, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, Neusüss S, et al. (2023) Non-standard errors. J. Finance. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Nagel S (2018) Code-sharing policy: Update. Journal of Finance Editor Blog (March 6), https://voices.uchicago.edu/jfeditor/2018/03/06/code-sharing-policy-update.Google Scholar
• Naudet F, Sakarovitch C, Janiaud P, Cristea I, Fanelli D, Moher D, Ioannidis JP (2018) Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: Survey of studies published in the BMJ and PLOS Medicine. BMJ 218:360.Google Scholar
• Nosek BA, Spies JR, Motyl M (2012) Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspective Psych. Sci. 7(6):615–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):aac4716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pérignon C, Gadouche K, Hurlin C, Silberman R, Debonnel E (2019) Certify reproducibility with confidential data. Science 365(6449):127–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pérignon C, Akmansoy O, Hurlin C, Dreber A, Holzmeister F, Huber J, Johannesson M, et al. (2023) Computational reproducibility in finance: Evidence from 1,000 tests. Working paper, HEC Paris Research Paper, Paris.Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psych. Sci. 22(11):1359–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uhlmann EL, Ebersole CR, Chartier CR, Errington TM, Kidwell MC, Lai CK, McCarthy RJ, et al. (2019) Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspective Psych. Sci. 14(5):711–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vilhuber L (2019) Report by the AEA data editor. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109:718–729.Google Scholar
• Vlaeminck S (2021) Dawning of a new age? Economics journals’ data policies on the test bench. LIBER Quart. J. Assoc. Eur. Res. Libraries 31(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch I (2019) Reproducing, extending, updating, replicating, reexamining, and reconciling. Critical Finance Rev. 8(1–2):301–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiong X, Cribben I (2023) The state of play of reproducibility in statistics: An empirical analysis. Amer. Statist. 77(2):115–126.Crossref, Google Scholar