Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: The Impact of California’s Cap-and-Trade Program on Toxic Emissions
References
- (2017) California’s cap-and-trade system: Diffusion and lessons. Global Environ. Polit. 17(3):12–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Beyond shareholder value maximization: Accounting for financial/social trade-offs in dual-purpose companies. Acad. Management Rev. 47(2):237–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Environmental performance and the market for corporate assets. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2444–2464.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Follow the smoke: The pollution haven effect on global sourcing. Strategic Management J. 42(13):2420–2450.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J. Human Resources 50(2):317–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Carbon trading, co-pollutants, and environmental equity: Evidence from California’s cap-and-trade program (2011–2015). PLoS Med. 15(7):e1002604.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Sincerity in corporate philanthropy, stakeholder perceptions and firm value. Organ. Sci. 27(1):173–188.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) The judgment of garbage: End-of-pipe treatment and waste reduction. Management Sci. 60(7):1812–1828.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Do environmental markets cause environmental injustice? Evidence from California’s carbon market. J. Public Econom. 217:104786.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and U.S. oil and gas firms. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1769–1786.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Community characteristics and changes in toxic chemical releases: Does information disclosure affect environmental injustice? J. Bus. Ethics 145(2):277–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Institutional investors and corporate environmental, social, and governance policies: Evidence from toxics release data. Management Sci. 65(10):4901–4926.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. 48(2):289–299.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Are aliens green? Assessing foreign establishments’ environmental conduct in the United States. Strategic Management J. 22(11):1069–1085.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Learning from testimony on quantitative research in management. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management J. 25(4):331–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):538–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Private action in public interest: The comparative governance of social issues. Strategic Management J. 40(4):476–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2591–2617.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Does corporate investment drive a “race to the bottom” in environmental protection? A reexamination of the effect of environmental regulation on investment. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1297–1318.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Public versus private firms: Energy efficiency, Toxic emissions, and abatement spending. Dorobantu S, Aguilera RV, Luo J, Milliken SJ, eds. Sustainability, Stakeholder Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 37–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Interpreting interactions in linear fixed-effect regression models: When fixed-effect estimates are no longer within-effects. Strategy Sci. 4(1):25–40.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Government green procurement spillovers: Evidence from municipal building policies in California. J. Environ. Economics Management 68(3):411–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions: Thematic issue on corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management J. 59(2):534–544.Crossref, Google Scholar

