Groups Are More Libertarian than Individuals

References

• Ackfeld V, Ockenfels A (2021) Do people intervene to make others behave prosocially? Games Econom. Behav. 128:58–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D (2019) Should we tax sugar-sweetened beverages? An overview of theory and evidence. J. Econom. Perspect. 33(3):202–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambuehl S, Bernheim BD (2021) Interpreting the will of the people: A positive analysis of ordinal preference aggregation. NBER Working Paper No. 2938, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ambuehl S, Bernheim BD, Ockenfels A (2021) What motivates paternalism? An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):787–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambuehl S, Blesse S, Doerrenberg P, Feldhaus C, Ockenfels A (2023) Politicians’ social welfare criteria: An experiment with German legislators. CESifo Working Paper No. 10329, CESifo, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Andre P, Boneva T, Chopra F, Falk A (2024a) Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action. Nature Climate Change 14:253–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andre P, Boneva T, Chopra F, Falk A (2024b) Misperceived social norms and willingness to act against climate change. Rev. Econom. Statist. 1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2003) “Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):73–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fehr E, Herz H (2014) The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica 82(6):2005–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Cappelen AW, Hermes H, Skivenes M, Tungodden B (2023) Free to Fail? Paternalistic Preferences in the United States (Mimeo) (Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany).Google Scholar
• Bass BM (2009) The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Benz M, Frey BS (2008) The value of doing what you like: Evidence from the self-employed in 23 countries. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 68(3):445–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A, Thonemann UW (2012) Managers and students as newsvendors. Management Sci. 58(12):2225–2233.Link, Google Scholar
• Buffat J, Praxmarer M, Sutter M (2023) The intrinsic value of decision rights: A replication and an extension to team decision making. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 209:560–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Jensen R (2015) How does peer pressure affect educational investments? Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1329–1367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, González AL, Yanagizawa-Drott D (2020) Misperceived social norms: Women working outside the home in Saudi Arabia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(10):2997–3029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Konow J, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013) Just luck: An experimental study of risk-taking and fairness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1398–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Sutter M (2012) Groups make better self-interested decisions. J. Econom. Perspect. 26(3):157–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lim N (2013) Should managers use team-based contests? Management Sci. 59(12):2823–2836.Link, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Friedman J, Leth-Petersen S, Nielsen T, Olsen T (2014) Active vs. passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts: Evidence from Denmark. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1141–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Rebele R, Grant A (2016) Collaborative overload. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(1):16.Google Scholar
• Darley JM, Latane B (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 8(4 pt 1):377–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeCicca P, Kenkel D, Lovenheim MF (2022) The economics of tobacco regulation: A comprehensive review. J. Econom. Literature 60(3):883–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Della Vigna S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G (2017) Voting to tell others. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(1):143–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deloitte B (2016) Global Human Capital Trends 2016, the New Organization: Different by Design (Deloitte University Press, London).Google Scholar
• Doz YL, Guadalupe M (2019) Escaping the “S-Curve”—Is the “Agile” Organization the Answer? INSEAD Working Paper No. 2019/15/STR/EPS, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Duch ML, Grossmann MRP, Lauer T (2020) z-Tree unleashed: A novel client-integrating architecture for conducting z-Tree experiments over the Internet. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 28:100400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engel C (2011) Dictator games: A meta study. Experiment. Econom. 14(4):583–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewers M, Zimmermann F (2015) Image and misreporting. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(2):363–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg J (1978) Voluntary euthanasia and the inalienable right to life. Philos. Public Affairs 7(2):93–123.Google Scholar
• Feri F, Irlenbusch B, Sutter M (2010) Efficiency gains from team-based coordination—Large-scale experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1892–1912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer P, Krueger J, Greitemeyer T, Vogrincic C, Kastenmüller A, Frey D, Heene M, Wicher M, Kainbacher M (2011) The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psych. Bull. 137(4):517–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fréchette GR (2016) Experimental economics across subject populations. Kagel JH, Roth AE, ed. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 435–480.Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Levine DK, Maniadis Z (2012) On the robustness of anchoring effects in WTP and WTA experiments. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 4(2):131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:623–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khalmetski K, Ockenfels A (2024) Altruistic punishment as norm-signaling: A model and experimental evidence. Preprint, February 28, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4716824.Google Scholar
• Kocher MG, Sutter M (2005) The decision maker matters: Individual versus group behaviour in experimental beauty‐contest games. Econom. J. 115(500):200–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocher MG, Praxmarer M, Sutter M (2020) Team decision-making. Zimmermann KF, ed. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocher MG, Schudy S, Spantig L (2018) I lie? We lie! Why? Experimental evidence on a dishonesty shift in groups. Management Sci. 64(9):3995–4008.Link, Google Scholar
• Kölle F, Kübler D, Ockenfels A (2024) Impartial policymakers prefer to impose carbon pricing to capping, especially when combined with offsets. Ecological Econom. 126:108348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krawczyk M, Wozny LP (2017) An experiment on temptation and attitude towards paternalism. Preprint, submitted February 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2912427.Google Scholar
• Kugler T, Kausel EE, Kocher MG (2012) Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups. WIRE Cogn. Sci. 3(4):471–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhan WJ, Kocher MG, Sutter M (2009) Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered. Experiment. Econom. 12(1):26–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maciejovsky B, Sutter M, Budescu DV, Bernau P (2013) Teams make you smarter: How exposure to teams improves individual decisions in probability and reasoning tasks. Management Sci. 59(6):1255–1270.Link, Google Scholar
• Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L (2008) Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Management 34(3):410–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Neill TA, Salas E (2018) Creating high performance teamwork in organizations. Human Resource Management Rev. 28(4):325–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez-Truglia R, Cruces G (2017) Partisan interactions: Evidence from a field experiment in the United States. J. Political Econom. 125(4):1208–1243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips OR, Menkhaus DJ (2010) The culture of private negotiation: Endogenous price anchors in simple bilateral bargaining experiments. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(3):705–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raihani NJ, Power EA (2021) No good deed goes unpunished: The social costs of prosocial behaviour. Evolutionary Human Sci. 3:e40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan RG, Wulf J (2006) The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):759–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rawls J (1980) Kantian constructivism in moral theory. J. Philos. 77(9):515–572.Google Scholar
• Rigby DK, Sutherland J, Noble A (2018) Agile at scale. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(3):88–96.Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psych. 55(1):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA (2008) On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors 50(3):540–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Wang G, Courtright SH (2011) Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psych. 96(5):981–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spector PE (1986) Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations 39(11):1005–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uhl M (2011) Do self-committers mind other-imposed commitment? An experiment on weak paternalism. Rationality Markets Morals 2(40):13–34.Google Scholar
• Young R (1982) Autonomy and paternalism. Canadian J. Philos. Supplementary 8:47–66.Crossref, Google Scholar