Revenue Sharing at Music Streaming Platforms

References

• Adams WJ, Yellen JL (1976) Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. 90(3):475–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alaei S, Makhdoumi A, Malekian A, Pekeč S (2022) Revenue-sharing allocation strategies for two-sided media platforms: Pro-rata vs. user-centric. Management Sci. 68(12):8699–8721.Link, Google Scholar
• Aumann RJ, Maschler M (1985) Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. J. Econom. Theory 36(2):195–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergantiños G, Moreno-Ternero JD (2015) The axiomatic approach to the problem of sharing the revenue from museum passes. Games Econom. Behav. 89:78–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergantiños G, Moreno-Ternero JD (2020) Sharing the revenues from broadcasting sport events. Management Sci. 66(6):2417–2431.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergantiños G, Moreno-Ternero JD (2021) Compromising to share the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 183:57–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergantiños G, Moreno-Ternero JD (2022) On the axiomatic approach to sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues. Soc. Choice Welfare 58(2):321–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK (2013) Mixed bundling of two independently valued goods. Management Sci. 59(9):2170–2185.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Lertwachara K, Marsden JR, Telang R (2007) The effect of digital sharing technologies on music markets: A survival analysis of albums on ranking charts. Management Sci. 53(9):1359–1374.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ferecatu A, Kusterer DJ (2024) Rate this transaction: Coordinating mappings in market feedback systems. Management Sci. 70(1):567–588.Link, Google Scholar
• Datta H, Knox G, Bronnenberg BJ (2018) Changing their tune: How consumers’ adoption of online streaming affects music consumption and discovery. Marketing Sci. 37(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Dietzenbacher BJ, Kondratev AY (2023) Fair and consistent prize allocation in competitions. Management Sci. 69(6):3319–3339.Link, Google Scholar
• Dimont J (2017) Royalty inequity: Why music streaming services should switch to a per-subscriber model. Hastings Law J. 69(2):675–700.Google Scholar
• Flores-Szwagrzak K, Treibich R (2020) Teamwork and individual productivity. Management Sci. 66(6):2523–2544.Link, Google Scholar
• Geng X, Stinchcombe MB, Whinston AB (2005) Bundling information goods of decreasing value. Management Sci. 51(4):662–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Ginsburgh V, Zang I (2003) The museum pass game and its value. Games Econom. Behav. 43:322–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonçalves-Dosantos J, Martinez R, Sánchez-Soriano J (2024) Measures of relevance in the success of streaming platforms. Preprint, submitted March 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08421.Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson J, Hougaard JL, Ko CY (2024) Sharing sequentially triggered losses: Automated conflict resolution through smart contracts. Management Sci. 70(3):1773–1786.Link, Google Scholar
• Haampland O, Johannessen R, Moreau F, Wikstrom P (2022) Fairness and royalty payment systems on music streaming platforms. https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23522.81607.Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J (1959) A bargaining model for cooperative n-person games. Tucker AW, Luce RD, eds. Contributions to the Theory of Games IV (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 325–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hougaard JL, Moulin H (2014) Sharing the cost of redundant items. Games Econom. Behav. 87:339–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S, Qian K (2021) Compensating online content producers: A theoretical analysis. Management Sci. 67(11):7075–7090.Link, Google Scholar
• Krajewska M, Kopfer H, Laporte G, Ropke S, Zaccour G (2008) Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: Request allocation and profit sharing. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 59:1483–1491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laruelle A, Valenciano F (2001) Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf indices revisited. Math. Oper. Res. 26(1):89–104.Link, Google Scholar
• Lei X (2023) Pro-rata vs user-centric in the music streaming industry. Econom. Lett. 226:111111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Littlechild S, Owen G (1973) A simple expression for the Shapley value in a special case. Management Sci. 20(3):370–372.Link, Google Scholar
• Martínez R, Moreno-Ternero JD (2022) An axiomatic approach towards pandemic performance indicators. Econom. Model. 116:105983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyn J, Kandziora M, Albers S, Clement M (2023) Consequences of platforms’ remuneration models for digital content: Initial evidence and a research agenda for streaming services. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 51(1):114–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreno-Ternero J, Roemer J (2006) Impartiality, priority and solidarity in the theory of justice. Econometrica 74(5):1419–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muikku J (2017) Pro rata and user centric distribution models: A comparative study. Technical report, Digital Media Finland, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
• Page W, Safir D (2018) Money in, money out: Lessons from CMOs in allocating and distributing licensing revenue. Technical report, Music and Copyright Newsletter.Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA (2021) Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Management 47(6):1528–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlicher L, Dietzenbacher B, Musegaas M (2024) Stable streaming platforms: A cooperative game approach. Omega 125:103020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapley L (1953) A value for n-person games. Kuhn HW, Tucker AW, eds. Contributions to the Theory of Games II (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 307–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singal R, Besbes O, Desir A, Goyal V, Iyengar G (2022) Shapley meets uniform: An axiomatic framework for attribution in online advertising. Management Sci. 68(10):7457–7479.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (2023) The Axiomatics of Economic Design, Vol. 1. Studies in Choice and Welfare (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• van den Brink R, van der Laan G, Vasil’ev V (2014) Constrained core solutions for totally positive games with ordered players. Internat. J. Game Theory 43(2):351–368.Google Scholar
• van den Nouweland A, Borm P, van Golstein Brouwers W, Groot Bruinderink R, Tijs S (1996) A game theoretic approach to problems in telecommunication. Management Sci. 42(2):294–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Vasilev VA (1978) Support function of the core of a convex game. Optimizacija Vyp 21:30–35.Google Scholar
• Vasilev VA (1981) On a class of imputations in cooperative games. Soviet Math. Doklady 23:53–57.Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2017) How digitization has created a golden age of music, movies, books, and television. J. Econom. Perspect. 31(3):195–214.Crossref, Google Scholar